But there are dozens of open-source licenses, many of which permit people to create proprietary software out of the open software.
As more people used open-source software, the popular media and public began to conflate free software and open source — much to free-software inventor Richard Stallman's dismay. I worry that this Microsoft-Novell deal has the potential to do the same thing to open-source software.
The more Microsoft can absorb Linux, the fewer people will recognize the challenge Linux represents. Linux isn't just an alternative set of software tools. It's another mode of production — one that's more transparent and more sensitive to the public good. That's something we can't afford to lose. SFBG
Annalee Newitz is a surly media nerd who thinks that if Microsoft makes a software shim, Linux developers should make a software shiv and stick those bastards right in the gut.
Also from this author
The science of subversion
Don't ever stop ruthlessly criticizing everything that exists. It's the only way we'll survive
The National Security Agency may be about to gain access to the phone calls and Internet activities of millions
Also in this section
Don't ever stop ruthlessly criticizing everything that exists. It's the only way we'll survive
The National Security Agency may be about to gain access to the phone calls and Internet activities of millions
Free, accessible, and dangerous? Hardly.
Most Commented On
Recent comments
- Only Landlords Could Possibly - May 22, 2013
- "Libertarian socialist" - May 22, 2013
- More important things in life than being a control freak - May 22, 2013
- Don't blame jaywalking - May 22, 2013
- It would be even more amusing... - May 22, 2013
- Constitution: Drug laws are illegal, drugs are legal - May 22, 2013
- Non-Aggression is the libertarian way - May 22, 2013
- So why use a corporate profits tax at all? - May 22, 2013
- It would be amusing to - May 22, 2013
- blinkered thinking - May 22, 2013








