Don't rush the Candlestick EIR - Page 2
One of the few times that the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors will get to weigh in on the biggest land-use decision facing San Francisco today
| |
(0)
Print
The EIR broadly proclaims that "construction activities associated with the project would not result in a human health risk involving the disturbance of naturally occurring asbestos, demolition of buildings that could contain hazardous substances in building materials, or possible disturbance of contaminated soils or groundwater within one-quarter mile of an existing school." That is at the very least a matter of some dispute.
There's lots more - 4,400 pages more - and if the approval process is going to be anything other than an utter farce, the Planning and Redevelopment directors need to extend the public comment period for at least another 45 days. *
Also from this author
CCA allows communities to offer an alternative — to buy cleaner power in bulk and resell it at comparable or cheaper rates to residents and businesses
A holdover from a discredited administration is still running the Justice Department in one of the most liberal parts of the United States
