In defense of Bay to Breakers

For 99 years, Bay to Breakers has been lifting the city's spirits, bringing fun, tax revenue, and millions of tourism dollars to San Francisco

|
(32)

By Conor Johnston

OPINION An op-ed piece in the June 9 issue of Guardian ("When the rich can sit on the sidewalks") was the latest in a rash of negative media stories about Bay to Breakers. I am not going to respond to that article specifically, except to thank the Guardian for giving us equal time.

For 99 years, Bay to Breakers has been lifting the city's spirits, bringing fun, tax revenue, millions of tourism dollars, and nationwide attention to San Francisco. If ever we needed those things, it's now, when we have record deficits, 47,000 people out of work, and may lose the football team that is named after us.

So let's set the record straight.

Bay to Breakers does not cost taxpayers a dime. The event pays for all costs, including cleanup. And the permit fees and tourism generate tax revenue. ING probably dropped its sponsorship for reasons unrelated to B2B. Sponsors come and go. B2B will find another. Bay to Breakers is a financial boon for San Francisco. The event attracts thousands of people to the city; 49 of 50 states were represented by participants in 2008. The average tourist spends $505 in the local economy. Bay to Breakers is and always has been peaceful. There were fewer than five arrests reported this year. I have never seen a fight at B2B, not once, in seven years. Bay to Breakers remains enormously popular. There are about 100,000 participants and spectators, including many world-class runners.

This said, there are problems at B2B, namely public urination and the overall impact on the neighborhoods. We absolutely acknowledge that. But unlike the critics, we still believe in this city's ability to solve problems.

How do we do it? Not with prohibitions — they are a retreat, not a policy. Sound policy takes effort, collaboration, and commitment. Let's get the stakeholders together — neighborhood groups, race organizers, race supporters, SFPD, and city officials — and create a plan to protect the neighborhoods while preserving the race's spirit.

Our group, Citizens for the Preservation of Bay2Breakers, is committing to raise money for 100 additional multiperson urinals and to leading the cultural campaign for more responsibility among participants. And we have other ideas:

Ticket people who urinate on or disturb private property.

Rent more toilets.

Implement multiperson urinals, which are six times more efficient and are one-third of the cost per user.

Improve the barricades to keep participants on course.

Increase revenue with a tiered registration for non-runners.

Host an event in the park that attracts participants out of the neighborhoods sooner.

I see in Bay to Breakers a celebration of what it means to be San Francisco, to be capable, to be unafraid of free expression and unapologetic of diversity.

I see world-class runners lined up next to 30-somethings in Elvis costumes. I see convalescent patients lining the sidewalk, smiling and taking pictures with Rambo and Cinderella. I see mothers pushing costumed babies. I see 100,000 happy faces. But most of all, I see a century-old civic institution that is worth fighting for. *

Conor Johnston is co-chair of Citizens for the Preservation of Bay2Breakers and a resident of District 5.

Comments

Connor makes some excellent points. We all need to come together and take back our uniquely San Francisco event. That is why my organization, NOPNA, wants to work with all stakeholders in the Bay 2 Breakers and make the event fun for everyone.

We have met with Citizens for the Preservation of Bay2Breakers and feel that everyone should come to the table and work on creative solutions to these challenges.

Jarie Bolander, President, NOPNA

Posted by Guest on Jun. 23, 2010 @ 5:48 pm

Finally, a supporter of the B2B gets a chance to dispel the myths with facts. I was starting to believe that San Francisco went from “the city that knows how”, to “the city that knows how to say No”.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 23, 2010 @ 7:13 pm

I am in support of Conor's article and Jarie's comment. We need real, meaningful and ongoing communication with all stakeholders to properly plan and manage this event so it can be enjoyed by all with no impact on the neighborhoods.

AEG has failed as a race organizer. Problems which can be fixed with proper planning, management and resource allocation continue to dog this 100 year old event because AEG lacks the commitment and will to fix the problems. This year alone, they failed to manage a barrier at Hayes and Divisidero which spilled thousands of race participants off course and into the neighborhoods, causing unnecessary and preventable impact.

This is just one of many examples that can be corrected with proper planning, management and enforcement. If only AEG was willing to step it up.

Instead, they hire high-priced PR spin masters to point the finger at everyone else.

AEG, I think it's time you picked up the mirror and put down the magnifying glass.

Yes, stop pointing the finger. Otherwise, I think the Board of Supervisors should take away your privilege to run this event and give it to someone with better management and problem solving skills.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 23, 2010 @ 7:25 pm

Another example of the tyranny of the minority trying to ruin an event that the overwhelming majority of San Franciscans enjoy and support. Events like Bay to Breakers are what make SF a fun, unique place to live, people. You have my support, Conor, in stopping the spread of the fun-nazis.

Guy

Posted by Guy Incognito on Jun. 23, 2010 @ 7:30 pm

I run Bay 2 Breakers every year because it's a good run and it's fun and like Conor, I've never seen anything bad happen...except the fat naked guy running. That's pretty bad.
Keep up the good work CP B2B and NOPNA.
Marin Runner

Posted by Guest Marin Runner on Jun. 23, 2010 @ 8:00 pm

I love Bay to Breakers. It's my favorite day of the year, seriously, more so than my birthday. To me B2B is the perfect embodiment of San Francisco: a roving street party where the vibe is peaceful, the costumes are brilliant, and the clothing is optional. It's a testament to this city's tolerance and open-mindedness.

Of course some things have gone too far, but Conor's suggestions seem to be spot on ways to address them. I agree that the organizers should spend more of their time and money addressing the issues instead of pointing their fingers. Long live Bay to Breakers.

Broke-Ass Stuart

Posted by Broke-Ass Stuart on Jun. 23, 2010 @ 9:21 pm

Like I said after Tiny's op-ed, I always dread the coming of B2B. Y'all should change the route. If B2B is still goin' strong, start a new tradition and stop hacking the city in half for more than half the day! Ferry Bldg to Fort Mason, running over the hill to the Marina--or Ferry Bldg to 3rd Street, to the start of the 22 Line Bus and up that nasty steep bridge and go to some park nearby, wherever one is...

Posted by redbeardedguy on Jun. 23, 2010 @ 9:23 pm

Guy, a combined 100,000 runners and gawkers is not an overwhelming majority of the city. San Fran is at least 800,000 population. 10% does not a majority make. The rest of us avoid the madness and are glad it's gone for another year.

Posted by redbeardedguy on Jun. 23, 2010 @ 9:26 pm

I think it's time for the "organizers" to really look into the culture of San Francisco and to embrace it, rather than trying to sterilize the event. I understand that they probably want it managed and operated like their other running events, but that's not going to happen. This has, and always be, a San Francisco race. This is why people are willing to fly into San Francisco specifically for this event, because that is what it is, an EVENT!

Don't let the naysayers pinpoint a few bad apples and tell you that this is how the majority of participants are. People are drawn to the Bay to Breakers because it allows them to unwind and to remember what living is all about!

Posted by Guest on Jun. 23, 2010 @ 9:27 pm

Thank you Conor for representing the actual participants of Bay to Breakers. I don't think any of the sponsors have even been to the race. It is the most fun day of the year and is safer than going to the Marina with a popped collar.
It seems like this race is unfairly judged by the media/losers for what are minor infractions. I'm glad that these issues were not avoided by CPB2B, but were addressed head on. I hope there are more forums for people to support the race like this in the future.
Thanks!

Posted by GuestChris M. on Jun. 23, 2010 @ 9:31 pm
B2B

This is not a financial issue, even if it did cost some money for the city, it would be worth spending. This is a cultural issue. The B2B is know worldwide and it projects an image of the city as fun, tolerant, and exciting.

The B2B is an institution on par with the Ironman in Hawaii, and the Boston Maratheon. and the Ragbrai in Iowa.

I feel sorry for the few that have their lawns peed on, but consider it is once a year and your lawn is doing its civic duty.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 24, 2010 @ 8:08 am

It is the nay-sayers inability to appreciate the importance of this event to the spirit of the City that contributes to the annual barrage of negative comments to the press. The party lasts from 7am-noon one day a year. We are not talking about some daily impediment to your life, we are talking about the annual celebration of ingenuity, humor and, yes, peaceful drunkeness. If your preference is to gut the city of its personality, I respect that, but I do not think it is the majority rule. Simply because 100,000 show up in a city of 800,000 does not mean the event is outvoted 7-1, such an assertion is ludicrous. None of my many family members attend, but I assure you they support the event.

The fact is, it is not the event that is the problem, it's the peeing in public from Bill Graham to the Park. I recently went to the US Open where 40,000 people pee'd in humane and respectful ways. Point is, it can be done. So, follow Conor's lead and work to find solutions to that problem.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 24, 2010 @ 8:59 am

Every picture ever posted of Bay to Breakers is full of smiles. No one is frowning. Seriously, nothin' but ear-to-ear pearlies. What could be so wrong?

I suspect most of the people who oppose this event have never attended it, and instead are Mr. Schmoopy-pants knee-huggers who may not be capable of recognizing what a good time is, even if it ran up and kicked them in the v-neck while wearing an American Gladiators one-piece.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 24, 2010 @ 9:15 am

How about this solution? People, stop being so cheap. Register for the race and pay even through you are only walking and partying. If 100,000 pays $40, that would $4 million dollars that the city can hire more help and put in more toilets.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 24, 2010 @ 9:25 am

Thank you Conor for offering up this refreshing piece. A thoughtful response to all the negative press Bay to Breakers has been receiving as of late was long overdue. The wonderful city we live in (some of us, others are just complaining from the East Bay, ahemm) is host to a plethora of events annually celebrating diversity and individuality that is abound in this cultural hub we call home. B2B is yet another way that San Francisco comes out to play and shows off the freedom and individuality for which we are nationally recognized. Those complaining about cost to taxpayers are, simply put, uninformed and I thank you Conor for addressing that.

Finally someone has stepped up to the plate and offered up clear and achievable solutions to valid concerns. Instead of trying to shut down a 99 year institution simply because of a couple of bad eggs is ludicrous. Let's act like civilized adults and instead of ruining the fun for everyone (including those tourists that bring our city money), let's sit down and come up with some constructive solutions. What a novel idea.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 24, 2010 @ 10:37 am

Great article...Very well said. All valid points, I'd like to hear the detractors respond to this.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 24, 2010 @ 2:58 pm

Naked men reviving the sexual revolution, hairy pitted feminists, dads with their kids, mom's with their mom's, white guys, black guys, drunks, skinny runners, fat runners, DJs and piss.

These are the things you can expect at B2B every May. I ran the race this year, again, and realized something. People were having fun. Not the kind of fun you can buy at a club, or enjoy at a city hall gala. Runners had a chance to enjoy the fact that one day a year, nobody cared how you dressed or what you looked like. That's because 100,000 participants were too busy dancing, laughing, taking pictures, and seeing friends. Honestly, you go around one time in the world. Having one day a year to have a little fun, maybe pee on some bushes, slap a few high fives with some cops and be excited for next year's run doesn't sound like too much to ask for.

Stop the whining really, its a pretty good time.

Posted by Officer Fun Sponge on Jun. 24, 2010 @ 4:00 pm

Bay to Breakers has been a tradition in San Francisco since 1912, and as the race and cultural event is about to approach it's 100th birthday - I think the city should be celebrating something that makes San Francisco one of the most unique cities in the world, not finding reasons to shut it down.

I will be the first to say that it is not perfect, there is trash and people pee where they should not; but I cannot for one second believe that those negatives out weigh the value B2B brings to San Francisco.

Even if you don't enjoy the event, appreciate the culture or understand where it fits into the history of San Francisco - there is no way to ignore the financial benefits B2B bring to the city.

In 2009, visitors to San Francisco spent spent $7.8 billion in local businesses. In comparison, the same year visitors to Seattle, spent $471 million. Tourism indirectly bolsters practically every segment of the city's economy and has a broad positive influence on government finances - some $426 million in tax and fee revenue flowed into the City and County of San Francisco in 2009.

Shutting down B2B would be the beginning to eliminating all the unique events in San Francisco that make our city what it is - and what bring us worldwide recognition. It is a slippery slope when events like this get shut down. First it is B2B, then it is the Gay Pride Parade, then it is the St. Patrick's day parade. Large events in cities are not 100% seamless and have to be cleaned up after. That is just a fact and will never change. They are part of living in a large metropolitan city. I don't like the fact that I have to pay $6 to cross the Golden Gate bridge, my 2 bedroom apartment costs more than a 5 bedroom home in the Midwest, or that I hear a crazy homeless person screaming occasionally in the middle of the night outside my bedroom window... but these things are part of living in a large city like San Francisco, and I deal with it. I think the people who are so vehemently apposed to B2B should recognize that while it might not be their ideal way to spend a Sunday morning, B2B brings incredible value to the city and they should just deal with it.

I think that the city as well as the residents of San Francisco should spend more time trying to fix these problems before killing off an event that not only is a huge part to the culture of San Francisco, but bring significant revenue to the city.

Posted by AnnieW on Jun. 24, 2010 @ 5:19 pm

What Conor has done here is offer solutions instead of arguments. When your done saving the B2B can you please do something about the T.L.? Seems to me more people urinate in public in one hour in the tenderloin then they do at B2B. For that matter, check out Dolores park on a sunny Sunday. Should we ban people from those areas as well?

Posted by Guest on Jun. 24, 2010 @ 8:26 pm

Yes! Thank you Connor for your thoughts here, especially this one: "I see in Bay to Breakers a celebration of what it means to be San Francisco, to be capable, to be unafraid of free expression and unapologetic of diversity."

Posted by Guest Morgan Magilligan on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 7:55 am

Excellent thoughts shared by Conor. I agree especially with this: "I see in Bay to Breakers a celebration of what it means to be San Francisco, to be capable, to be unafraid of free expression and unapologetic of diversity."

Posted by Guest Morgan M on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 7:59 am

Thank you for speaking up about this. It seems all the press lately goes to the negative Nancy's and the naysayers. Great to hear a voice of optimism and collaboration as the race moves to it's hundredth year. I am tired of hearing participants being ridiculed in the press! Solve these problems or maybe get a new race organizer that has true San Francisco values behind it. I'd love to see the race become more green too. This is ONE day a year and what a special day it is! Keep it up Conor!

Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 10:27 am

Halloween in the Castro is gone, and folks in the Castro are happy about it, they got their neighborhood back and no more job-lots of people getting shot or stabbed. I lived in Iowa for a few years, you can't tell me B 2 B compares to RAGBRAI, a bike race that zig zags across most of the state!

I don't think B 2 B compares to the Boston Marathon or any other marathon either, since very very very few people actually compete to be first across the finish line. Boston and NYC Marathons (and similar others) are nothing but people try to win or achieve a personal best.

Nobody's talking about getting rid of Gay Pride, or Chinese New Year, etc. Tiny would be part of the fight-back if somebody seriously suggested either. GP and CNY exist for good reason--and they are both fun. GP brings so many people, so much money, it leaves B2B in the dust...

Posted by redbeardedguy on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 10:51 am

Thanks Connor for writing the piece, and thanks to The Guardian for running it. And thanks to the 50,000 fine folks that participate every year. The participants are what make the run great. ESPN listed Bay to Breakers as one of the 101 things sports fans need to do before they die. Just look at the event photographs and anyone can see why; it’s just plain fun.

In terms of community event support, I see a few negative comments to this article (all written by one reader) and the rest positive. That’s a pretty good barometer of support in this world where it is far more popular and far easier to complain about something than it is to do something about it.

Is public urination a problem? Sure – so let’s work toward a solution. Does the event disrupt travel in the city? Sure – so enjoy the regular traffic the other 364.5 days of the year. But on the third Sunday in May, get out your Elvis costume and try to have some fun.

Posted by Washington Runner on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 12:27 pm

Excellent article and points. We CAN save the tradition and history and this race if we work together with these ideas and solutions. It doesn't make any sense to have a few people complain and ruin the run of thousands.

Posted by Paul Dyson on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 12:31 pm

I'm so glad to see someone write something positive about Breakers and dispel the absurd myths that seem to have been going around! Breakers is a celebration of our city, of diversity, of living. That celebration is the "good reason" that Breakers exists, contrary to redbeardedguy's rather rude implication that it has no reason. If you want to be picky, the race's original purpose, six years after the 1906 earthquake, was to celebrate the fact that the city had survived and rebuilt after experiencing the nation's worst natural disaster. A century has passed, but the race created to commemorate a city's rise from ashes remains a race to celebrate a great modern city that is a beacon of progressiveness and diversity.

Redbeardguy also says Breakers is inferior to races like Boston because fewer people are vying to win Breakers. Actually, there aren't very many people in the whole world who can take a shot at winning either race; the elite fields of those two races overlap; winners of Breakers have won Boston, and vice versa. Elite is elite, and Breakers' elite field is on a par with any race's. Also, there are thousands of races you can run if all you want to do is run your best--they happen every weekend all across America. Look them up on active.com. But Breakers is special--that's the whole point! The fastest runners *in the world* run Breakers, and they are followed by thousands of runners (yes, many serious) and then thousands of walkers, many in fantastic costumes, some nude, and all having a great time and celebrating. Breakers is the *only* race like this in the world, and it is rightfully famous. Why on earth would we want it to be an ordinary race instead of a national treasure?

As far as changing the course to disrupt traffic less, well, you don't really celebrate a city by skirting its edges, do you? Plenty of races do that. Bridge to Bridge runs along the Embarcadero; not to slam that "other" B to B, but compared to Breakers? *YAWN*

Finally, comparing Breakers to a Halloween event where people were stabbed is utterly preposterous. Breakers has the friendliest, most open, accepting and joyful vibe of any event I've ever seen. I agree with those who have said it needs better organization--the race has had its ups and downs organization-wise over the decades, and it's due for some improvement now. Nurturing this race is a matter of civic pride. And for these grumpy anti-Breakers people like redbeardedguy, honestly, just try running or walking the race next year. I think you'll be surprised at how fun it really is.

Posted by Neytiri on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 12:36 pm

I tend to disagree with Connor. You see, solving problems is no way to fix a problem. When I see a problem I would much rather get rid of it than solve it. For example, I think it would be wise to get rid of the 4th of July as a way to avoid fires. Accordingly, I think there should be no more New Years as a way to curb noise polution and smile wrinkles. Speaking of noise polution, no more music of any kind, it causes pregnancy.

Really, I see the the "When the rich can sit on sidewalks" article as rediculous. As one who recently moved to San Francisco and experienced my 2nd B2B, I think the event is fantastic and exactly what gives San Francisco the sense of community unique to other urban settings accross the country. To strip the race of all its character would be a shame, and in doing so would ignore the progressive nature of the wonderful citizens who make this beautiful city what it is. Let's use solutions rather than ignorance.
M

Posted by Marc on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 1:14 pm

Capt Red Beard, you have to be kidding. You suggest we should not get rid of chinese new year or gay pride day but we should get rid of B2B because it's a traffic nuisance? How on earth do you justify such a moronic double standard?

What everyone fails to mention here is that all the naysayers want to end it because they don't like the people who enjoy the event. If this event is too white, too mainstream, too normal for you then leave!

I have no interest in your gay pride day, your chinese new year, or your S&M day at Folsom St. And all those events are paid with my tax dollars, create garbage, and interrupt traffic. Redbeard, get this: rich white people pay taxes and live in this city. We have rights and we have events we enjoy. We are going to enjoy them and you are just going to have to deal with it.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 1:24 pm

I'm all in favor of keeping Bay to Breakers, and I love other big parties, events, street fairs ... all of those things are part of San Francisco. I don't think Tiny wants to end B2B either, though I can't speak for her. I do think, however, that she has a point: If the people who attend big corporate sponsored events can take over the city streets and sidewalks for loud, disruptive events that occasionally lead to a bit of bad behavior -- and that's fine, that's what city streets are for and nobody's perfect -- why can't poor people sit on the sidewalk, too?

I'm for B2B, I support drinking in the streets and music and dancing and drinking in the parks and parties everywhere, and I think the folks who complain about noise and traffic disruption should get a clue and realize they live in a crowded city where public fun is part of the deal.

I also oppose the sit-lie law. I think my views are consistent.

Posted by tim on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 2:41 pm

Finally, some good press about the greatest race ever! Thanks Guardian, I was worried you'd gone over to the dark side! I suppose the world wouldn't end if B to B ended, but it would be an incredibly, stupid, sad, senseless loss! For me and the people I know who do it, it's so much fun planning our costumes then mingling with the pre-race crowd and trying to get a glimpse of the elites (which is really thrilling and inspiring). Then the gun goes off and running the race is a blast every step of the way. People lining the course cheer and I wave back and feel like I'm making about 20,000 new friends. Then after we finish running we just kick back and enjoy the costumes and festivities. I'm shocked by the negative press I've seen lately; just who do people think they are to suggest taking away an event so many others cherish?

Posted by Born to Run on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 6:13 pm

Great article, thanks! And big Kudos to the NOPNA president for being open and wanting to work toward a solution that works for everyone. Let's continue to get the word out that B to B is still a great and popular event, just in case any potential good sponsors have been misled to believe otherwise!

Posted by Celeste K on Jun. 25, 2010 @ 8:35 pm

Thanks again to Steven and Tim at the Guardian for running this article and presenting the other side of the story when no one else would.

Thanks to Jarie Bolander and all the neighborhood groups for leading the effort to improve B2B.

And thank you guys for all of the great comments in support of B2B. I am continually impressed by the commitment, reason, and humor of B2B's supporters. (Marc, your comment caused a minor stink in my office when I began laughing uncontrollably. Apparently that's frowned upon at work.)

We are scheduling our first stakeholders meeting now. I am confident that with your support we will resolve the problems and preserve Bay to Breakers.

You can follow the progress via our website (http://www.savebay2breakers.org/) or Facebook page (http://www.facebook.com/citizensf).

Thank you again, and see you at the 100th!

Conor Johnston
CPBB

Posted by Conor Johhnston on Jun. 29, 2010 @ 9:31 am