On the margins - Page 3

44TH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE: At risk youth struggle to get by in a city that's tough on young people


Winston believes politicians need to do a better job of making sure community-based organizations deliver on their promises to help working class communities of color. At the same time, as he acknowledges, "We can't cure the world in one day."

"Over the last five to 10 years, the African American population in SF has shrunk," he observed. "Everybody is moving to Antioch and Fairfield because people can't afford to live here. People are losing their jobs. And San Francisco has almost become impossible to live in unless you have a college degree. A lot of what I hear from youth is about economics. They want jobs. They want to be trained."


Political disputes over the city's sanctuary city policies on undocumented immigrants — which have left in limbo the question of whether arrested immigrants will get their days in court before being turned over to the federal government for possible deportation — have also been a source of instability for immigrant teens, many of whom are homeless and/or LGBTQ.

Police Commissioner Angela Chan, a staff attorney with the Asian Law Caucus, decried Mayor Gavin Newsom for refusing to implement Sup. David Campos' due process legislation, which the board approved in November 2009.

"It's been a little bit upsetting for the many groups that took the democratic process seriously. But these groups are still very committed to these kids," Chan said. "We are hoping to work with the new U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag to clarify this issue and explain that the top priority of the Obama administration is not to deport undocumented youth."

Other so-called tough-on-crime initiatives also threaten local at-risk young people. In September, City Attorney Dennis Herrera secured an injunction against 41 alleged gang members in Visitacion Valley, a strategy that progressives fear will accelerate the ongoing displacement of the African American community.

Court documents show that 66 percent of the men named in the injunction are 18 to 25 years old and that many have children in public housing, where lease holders are predominantly women of color.

San Francisco City College Trustee Chris Jackson, 27, is running for the District 10 seat on the Board of Supervisors. Noting that the southeast SF district has some of the highest numbers of poor people and children citywide, Jackson said that youth issues are similar to challenges that other voters face.

"But the context is different," said Jackson, who previously served on the San Francisco Youth Commission. "Young people care about safe streets because it's us or our friends who are on them. We care about schools because we are in them and want to go to college. And we are concerned about the future of employment because how do you tell folks to go to school if there are no jobs?"

Jackson notes that in the Bayview-Hunters Point, home to the city's largest remaining African American community, kids don't come back if they leave for college. "We see a brain drain. It's really difficult to retain young people, so it's important to first make sure that youth's housing needs are met. And they also need access to careers so that when they graduate, they know there is a job in the city. But right now, youth can't even find a summer job because of the recession."

He called for city policies that are based on the needs of current city residents rather than developers' profits or the desires of well-off outsiders to move here.

"San Francisco is more of an opportunity for Silicon Valley residents than for youth who were born and raised here. And part of the problem is city policies, ineffective programs, and a failure to provide job opportunities for youth," he said. "Everything for youth has been gutted."


I lived in the Haight for a year, and one of the reasons that prompted me to move was the kids who sat and panhandled on the sidewalk at all hours, drunk, high or rude. They would litter and cause trouble. It got frustrating when on my way to work at 7 AM a young street urchin would beg me for money, sometimes in an overly aggressive manner. Or how they would sleep in our building alcove vomiting, defecating etc. What would be a rather nice neighborhood is spoiled by these people who have no respect for those that live there full time. They treat the neighborhood like it is a canvas for their stupid behavior. Let's not forget what has become of the the entrance to Golden Gate Park by Stanyan. One can't go twenty feet without being offering drugs or hassled for money. I for one support the no sit/lie ban all the way. The Summer of Love was over 40 years ago people.

Posted by Steve on Oct. 21, 2010 @ 12:32 pm

>>>I lived in the Haight for a year, and one of the reasons that prompted me to move was the kids who sat and panhandled on the sidewalk at all hours, drunk, high or rude. They would litter and cause trouble.<<<...........You moved to an area (the Haight) before researching it? You didn't check out the neighorhood before you moved there? You just blindly moved into a neighborhood? Why would you do that? The Haight has been as you described for decades. I suspect the kids were there when you moved in. Why did you choose not to see them? When I've moved from one neighborhood to another I do my best to hang out in the neighborhood near where the apartment is that I'm interested in renting so I can get a real feel for the neighbors. Why didn't you do that? Why would you move into some place that you don't even know what it's like? You also said...>>>I for one support the no sit/lie ban all the way.<<< What do you propose to do with the people who are rounded up under Prop L? How do you expect to pay for it? It will not be funded by the way. Will it be illegal to be homeless in the City if this passes? Did you research this law before you got behind it? Are you not aware of the "Castro 14?"

Posted by Guest Bárbara Chelsai on Oct. 21, 2010 @ 2:17 pm

You lived there for a while and decided you didn't like it.
You moved.
Problem solved.

Every complaint you list is addressed by already existing laws.
Maybe it;s time for you to press the police to enforce those laws. Maybe you should consider forcing the police to do their jobs and walk a beat by voting Yes on Prop M.
What you shouldn't do is try to give away MY civil rights, and the civil rights of all your neighbors in San Francisco, in some half-assed attempt to get back at the people you objected to in the Haight, or whoever else you don't like seeing wherever you live now.
Since you claim to know when the Summer of Love was over, perhaps you could also tell us when we can look forward to the end of your Season of Hate.

Posted by Your Neighbor on Oct. 21, 2010 @ 1:08 pm

Related articles

  • The soul of the city

    44TH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE: The creative class — particularly the young people who are going to be the next generation of the creative class — needs space to grow

  • How they're sitting

    44TH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE: The kids on Haight Street aren't exactly like the stereotype you've been told about

  • On the edge

    44TH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE: For foster youth, turning 18 means growing up fast