Lee should stop the recycling eviction

It's class warfare, declared by the Newsom administration — and Lee, who got his start as a poverty lawyer, doesn't have to tolerate it

|
(3)

EDITORIAL Mayor Ed Lee needs to demonstrate, as we noted last week, that he's making a clean break from the politics and policies of the Newsom administration — and there are things he can do immediately to reassure San Franciscans that he's going to offer more than another 11 months of a failed administration.

He can start by calling off the eviction of the Haight Ashbury Neighborhood Recycling Center.

The move by Newsom to evict the recycling center, on the edge of Golden Gate Park, was part of his administration's war on the poor. It made no sense from a financial or environmental perspective. The center, which pays rent to the city, would be replaced by a community garden, which would pay nothing. The center creates green jobs that pay a living wage; all the workers would be laid off under Newsom's plan. The center also operates a native plant nursery and provides a drop-off recycling site for local businesses.

A community garden makes only limited sense in a shady area that gets fog most of the year.

The only reason Newsom was determined to get rid of the place is that low-income people who collect bottles and cans around the city (an environmentally positive activity, by the way) come by the center to drop them off and pick up a little cash. Some of the wealthier residents of the Haight don't like poor people wandering through their neighborhood. It's class warfare, declared by the Newsom administration — and Lee, who got his start as a poverty lawyer, doesn't have to tolerate it.

Lee should direct the Recreation and Parks Department to cease the eviction proceedings and negotiate a long-term lease for the Frederick Street site.

It seems like a small item in the long list of issues the new mayor will have to deal with — but the HANC recycling center has strong symbolic importance. Ending the eviction and allowing the center to stay would be a sign that Lee intends to be a mayor who is willing to work with the progressives and that he's not going to try to solve all the city's problems by blaming, harassing, and criminalizing people who are barely surviving in San Francisco.

The new mayor could take another simple step toward broad credibility by opening up his office — to the public and the press. Under Newsom, Room 200 was an unfriendly place to outsiders, and often the news media were treated as enemies. Lee should start holding regular press conferences — not just stage-managed events designed to showcase one issue, but broad-ranging, open sessions where reporters can ask questions about anything his administration is doing. And he ought to direct his press office to make compliance with the Sunshine Ordinance a priority.

For starters, he could release whatever proposed budget cuts Newsom left behind. It's hard to believe the former mayor just turned them over to Lee without a list of things that were on the chopping block. The sooner the public sees where the previous administration was going, the sooner we can all determine what, if anything, Lee will do differently.

Comments

Environmentally positive? If they just picked up cans from the street and public trash cans, yes, it would be. But what happens is they raid the blue bins. Those are full of cans. We still have to pay for the truck to come around and empty the bins, but the cans have been wheeled away in third world fleets of noisy, unsanitary stolen shopping carts. At 3am. After they stomp them all flat. Right outside my window. Talking and yelling.

The trash company could sell the cans to help subsidize the recycling program, but that money goes to the lataderos instead. And unfortunately - have you talked to many of them? - a huge percentage of them have substance issues. Money that could be going to recycling is going to liquor stores and drug dealers, going to keep them addicted and miserable.

I'm all for helping the lataderos. I've met some in my work. But giving money to an addict is not the best way to help him. Close the centers.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 19, 2011 @ 11:33 pm

Does anyone sense a touch of condescension (or thinly veiled racism) in the argument that closing the recycling center is the best thing for people pushing "unsanitary" and "third world" carts full of cans? That's like me saying, "Tsk tsk, you shouldn't get money for that recycling, 'cause you'll just get high with it," and then turning around to buy booze or weed. Some people might smell bad or make noise. But they aren't stupid, and won't like to be told what to do. Someone's still going to raid the bins for recyclables. They'll just be stealthier and truck the cans even farther across the city to make their pennies. Yeah, we can get rid of the HANC center--or many things. But that won't help the people of the Haight coexist any more peacefully.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 29, 2011 @ 12:21 am

This is the kind of community institution I moved here for. It pains me to hear people talk trash about it. I am unconvinced that removing it help the people of the Haight coexist any more peacefully. Why would it stop the raid on peoples' trash bins. That occurs all over the city, not just in the Haight. Should we close the recycling center on Market near Safeway, or maybe all the SF recycling facilities as well, so no one can ever get reimbursed for their recycling? That would mean we would have no choice but to pay our deposit but then return the recycling to Sunset Scavenger for free.
Does anyone sense a touch of condescension (or thinly veiled racism) in the argument that closing the HANC center is the best thing for people pushing "unsanitary" and "third world" carts full of cans? That's like me saying, "Tsk tsk, you shouldn't get money for that recycling, 'cause you'll just get high with it," and then turning around to buy booze or weed. Some people might smell bad or make noise. But they aren't stupid, and don't like to be treated differently or judged anymore than anyone else. Someone's still going to raid the bins. They'll just be stealthier and truck the cans even farther across the city to make their pennies.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 29, 2011 @ 12:36 am

Also from this author

  • Guardian endorsements

    Campos for Assembly, Yes on Props. B and 42, re-elect Gov. Jerry Brown — our recommendations for the June 2014 primary election

  • The future of Piers 30-32

  • Hold BART accountable for deaths