Mirkarimi running for sheriff

Hennessey's pick for his successor

|
(27)

OPINION Serving as San Francisco Sheriff is a huge civic responsibility. The sheriff has 1,000 employees, more than 2,000 pretrial and sentenced prisoners daily, and management responsibility for a budget of more than $150 million. And, like all department heads, the sheriff's involved in a lot of politics.

I believe Sup. Ross Mirkarimi is the person best prepared to serve as San Francisco's next sheriff.

Mirkarimi has the law enforcement experience of graduating from the San Francisco Police Academy (as class president) and more than eight years of on-the-job experience as an investigator for the San Francisco District Attorney. He was the lead investigator in one of the city's all-time biggest white collar crime cases, against Old Republic National Title Insurance Company.

As a union labor representative in the D.A.'s office, he picked up some significant experience negotiating contracts for public safety personnel under the CALPERS retirement system.

He's no stranger to the training and discipline of a paramilitary institution, having been certified in advanced environmental crime forensics from the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Glynco, Ga., as well as earning an honorable discharge from the U.S. Navy for serving in the reserves.

Equally important, Mirkarimi has demonstrated the progressive values required to maintain and expand San Francisco's outstanding track record of diversity in hiring, innovation in criminal justice, and commitment to rehabilitation San Francisco deserves in our next sheriff.

Elected supervisor in 2004, and reelected in 2008 with 77 percent of the vote, Mirkarimi has been a very effective advocate for his district and for San Francisco — especially on public safety issues.

As a member of the Budget Committee for five years and twice chair of the Public Safety Committee, he is intimately familiar with the complicated issues confronting all partners in San Francisco's criminal justice system, whose combined budgets account for well over $1 billion.

Mirkairmi and I have worked together on many criminal justice issues, including the creation of San Francisco's Reentry Council and an innovative community-based program that provides case management services to ex-offenders who have a history of violence. That program — the No Violence Alliance — has significantly reduced recidivism among the program's participants. It was a risky venture to take on violent offenders as a case management study, but both Mirkarimi and I felt that it was time San Francisco expanded its approach toward effective reentry.

It is this type of thoughtful, yet courageous approach to our criminal justice challenges that leads me to endorse Ross Mirkarimi to be my successor.

The San Francisco Sheriff's Department has many difficult challenges ahead: a diminishing budget; the governor's "prison realignment," which will put many state prisoners in the county jail; preserving the jail's rehabilitation programs; and finding cost-effective ways of managing the 40,000 individuals who come through San Francisco's jails each year.

I believe Ross Mirkarimi brings the right combination of law enforcement training, legislative experience, and political acumen to meet these challenges. I am proud to support him in his bid to become our next sheriff.

Mike Hennessey is sheriff of San Francisco.

Comments

This city needs dramatic changes and we don't need another "do nothing" career politician. It's time Ross got off the public dole and worked for a living. In his tenure as a supervisor we have witnessed the fast decline of the city. More violent crime, poor services, unbalanced budgets, and a massive bloating of public employees.
In the face of a huge national economic crisis Ross and his fellow board members increased the number of SF city employees versus making the tough choices we needed from our leadership.
Instead of making the tough choices and fighting some of the special interests the city is faced with an annual shortfall in money and the services we receive have declined as well.
Say no to lazy career politicians, say yes to working for a living -- and vote for anyone other than Ross.

Posted by Guest Joe Fitzpatrick on Sep. 07, 2011 @ 9:56 pm

Ross is one of the hardest working and productive members of the Board of Supervisors. I enjoy reading others' well-informed, intelligent postings.

Posted by Guest Patricia Forsyth on Sep. 12, 2011 @ 3:15 pm

"More violent crime"
Guest Joe Fitzpatrick on Sep. 07, 2011 @ 9:56 pm

California crime rate hits 42-year low
Local numbers largely reflected the statewide trend. The violent crime rate was down 4.6 percent in San Francisco

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/crime/detail?entry_id=97378

Like a lot of right wing idiots in the comments sections here, this guy feels a need to paint an apocalyptic picture of San Francisco and the nation in order to convince everyone not to question their throbbing hard-on to fuck it up and burn it down.

Just say NO to Trolls and liars.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 12, 2011 @ 5:58 pm

Ross lazy?

I don't think so. He's fully qualified for the post but I don't want him to get it for several reasons.

First, Miyamoto is far more qualified and we're going to need a Sheriff prepared to take up to 700 more prisoners into the system which is gonna happen real quick. You want a guy with time in the organization who knows where every cell in every 'pod' is and it don't hurt if he's the head of the rescue team that goes in in the event of a riot.

Second, we (Progressives) will lose the D-5 seat to a conservative appointee of any mayoral candidate other than Adachi, Avalos or Baum. They'd appoint a Prog to replace Ross.

Better for Ross to serve his term out and then run for Assembly.

Giants underway ...

h.

Posted by h. brown on Sep. 12, 2011 @ 6:26 pm

There is no other choice Ross is the best Choice. For those of you who say you want to cut all city services except those of the rich give up you won't win.

And by the way no on c and d

Posted by Guest Brenda Barros on Sep. 20, 2011 @ 12:27 pm

Captain Paul Miyamoto has the support of the members of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department. That is a huge factor that San Franciscans should think about. He has worked all the jail facilities and know the inmates and those arrested in San Francisco better than any officer on the street. He has dedicated many years of service handling the inmate population and knowing how they act, how they live, how they utilize programs, and how they abuse programs. No other candidate can claim this skill and most especially, Capt. Miyamoto has not been politicized. He is a fresh breath of air in city government and is not tainted by silly politics and backdoor dealings. The other candidates may have the basic requirements to run as Sheriff, however Capt. Miyamoto has dedicated his life and career to serving with the Sheriff's Department as well as serving the City and County of San Francisco. He has been on the street as mutual aid to various law enforcement agencies. He has worked with civilian and programs staff in regards to making programs more accessible to inmates and making sure inmates who want to use these programs offered can. He has been a well balanced supervisor enforcing the rules and regulations, while still remembering his experiences as a line staff deputy. He has listened to every complaint, every praise, and every concern that comes up from those incarcerated. A San Franciscan who is true to his community, he works to better the lives of not just his family, but to all others in San Francisco. Vote Paul Miyamoto for Sheriff 2011. EXPERIENCE, NOT POLITICS!

Posted by Guest on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 7:15 am

Captain Paul Miyamoto has the support of the members of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department. That is a huge factor that San Franciscans should think about. He has worked all the jail facilities and know the inmates and those arrested in San Francisco better than any officer on the street. He has dedicated many years of service handling the inmate population and knowing how they act, how they live, how they utilize programs, and how they abuse programs. No other candidate can claim this skill and most especially, Capt. Miyamoto has not been politicized. He is a fresh breath of air in city government and is not tainted by silly politics and backdoor dealings. The other candidates may have the basic requirements to run as Sheriff, however Capt. Miyamoto has dedicated his life and career to serving with the Sheriff's Department as well as serving the City and County of San Francisco. He has been on the street as mutual aid to various law enforcement agencies. He has worked with civilian and programs staff in regards to making programs more accessible to inmates and making sure inmates who want to use these programs offered can. He has been a well balanced supervisor enforcing the rules and regulations, while still remembering his experiences as a line staff deputy. He has listened to every complaint, every praise, and every concern that comes up from those incarcerated. A San Franciscan who is true to his community, he works to better the lives of not just his family, but to all others in San Francisco. Vote Paul Miyamoto for Sheriff 2011. EXPERIENCE, NOT POLITICS!

Posted by Guest on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 7:16 am

Captain Mediocrity has the support of the cops, so that's what San Franciscans should think about. Not what's good for the city, but what's good for the deputy sheriffs. And Captain Mediocrity is all about what's good for the deputy sheriffs. They know where their bread is buttered, so they support Captain Mediocrity. Who cares about that guy Henessey! We never liked that liberal anyway, so listen to what we say, not what he says. Captain Mediocrity to the rescue!!! He's not political, and by "not political," I mean "conservative," because for people like me, ideology only counts when it's liberal. When it's conservative, it's not ideology. I may be a deputy sheriff or maybe I'm just a campaign shill, but either way having Captain Mediocrity win is in my best interests, so I'm ready to defend Captain Mediocrity with every catchphrase, talking point, and empty slogan I can think of! I'll say things like "well balanced supervisor" and "good listener" and "works to better people's lives" and "true to his community" and "breath of fresh air" and above all, "not tainted by silly politics." And you'll NEVER get me to use paragraphs because I'm too busy for minor conventions of the English language like that. And besides I'm too busy campaigning for Captain Mediocrity so I really need to get the message out fast. So remember, Vote Captain Paul Mediocrity for Sheriff 2011! EMPTY SLOGANS, NOT IDEAS!!!

Posted by Mirror Image on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 11:07 am

I think most people in San Francisco, left, right, and center would agree that would be Mike Henessey. And what did Mike Henessey do before he was elected? Was he a deputy sheriff? No, he was an ACLU attorney. Did he have the support of the deputy sheriffs? Of course not! They want one of their own so that if they do anything wrong, the head guy will cover their asses. Well, too bad. That's not what the sheriff is there for. The sheriff is there to represent us -the people of San Francisco, not the narrow special interests the department. We need somebody with ideas, not a career ass-kisser like Miyamoto. The ONLY candidate who fits the bill is Ross, by a long shot.

On the other hand... unless John Avalos or Leland Yee win the mayor's race, we're pretty well screwed on Ross's replacement for D5. Maybe Adachi would appoint a progressive, though I'm really not sure any more. If it's Ed Lee, we get a moderate. And he won't be stupid about it either -his backers Willie Brown and Rose Pak are not stupid. They're not going to give us a Sean Elsbernd in D5. They'll give us someone who looks good -possibly a woman of color, maybe LGBT, so they'll be harder to criticize from the left -someone who mouths the right phrases and then votes conservative. And we'll be stuck with that person for 9 years. That's a big problem, there's no denying it.

Hopefully the polls will change by election day, enough to justify the enormous risk of losing Ross in D5. Hopefully. Otherwise, progressives are in a real pickle.

Posted by Greg on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 8:20 am

Greg X,

Ask Chris Daly about when he had to come across the hall and go into Ross' office to calm him down because Ross was so loudly abusive of his staff. When Daly has to calm you down you have a serious problem.

This wasn't just a one time incident. Mirkarimi has always 'kissed up and kicked down'. If he's that bad with a staff of 2 try and imagine the kind of workplace he'd create for a staff of 1,000 along with nearly 2,000 prisoners after Realignment has fully kicked in.

Sadly I've had this problem many times in my life. What to do when you witness a personal friend who has always treated you great abusing someone else just because they have the power over that person.

In this case the answer is to respond to Greg X.

Niners in 19 minutes!

Or, should I say, First Place Niners!?!

h.

Posted by h. brown on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 8:46 am

Please remember all, that the Sheriff's department is the one in charge of foreclosures and evictions.

So ask yourself, if and when the evicters come for you, do want a Sheriff who is a strong ideological progressive, or do you want a Sheriff who is a former law and order minded cop.

Posted by Eric Brooks on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 9:47 am

will disregard his legal requirement to carry out evictions and foreclosures? IOW, a law-breaking Sherriff?

Most evictions and departures due to foreclosures happen before it gets to that point. Not many people these days get physically dragged out of their homes. That's not very dignified and having all your stuff dumped on the sidewalk isn't either, so people avoid it.

I want a sherriff who will caryy out his legal duties. You?

Posted by PaulT on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 10:22 am

Not the banks. But that's just me. I know that you and I differ on that, Paul.

Posted by Greg on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 10:49 am

He is supposed to follow and enforce the law. And if the law says that a defaulter loses his home, then the Sheriff has no option but to enact that. He's not charged with setting public policy or writing laws.

In a broader sense, it's not even clear why we elect the Sheriff. Some places don't.

Posted by PaulT on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 11:47 am

So now we're buying into corporate media stereotypes about Chris Daly too? I think we both know that Chris Daly isn't the monster that the Chron makes him out to be. But since you're already shilling for Gascon, Miyamoto, and Adachi/Moritz, why not this too? Makes the political transformation more complete.

But let's set that aside.

You and I have a somewhat different approach, in that I recognize that people are not all good or all bad, but shades of gray. Ross has his problems, but he's still the only candidate who is capable of thinking outside the traditional law enforcement box in the way that Mike Hennessey did. That's why Hennessey endorsed him.

Miyamoto is a cop's cop -an ordinary, traditional, insider hack who will defend the cops right or wrong. That's why they love him -it's tribal. He's one of their own. As far as showing creativity in leadership, there's not much there.

And I freely acknowledge that the point you make about losing D5 is a good one. It makes this a very tough choice. But when you combine that with praising a mediocre apparatchik like Miyamoto, and not having a single good word to say about Ross, who's been one of the most hard working and progressive supes on the board, without question... well that really dampens your credibility on the subject. Nobody who wants progressive leadership in the sheriff's department seriously thinks that Miyamoto will bring that to the table. Claiming that he's so awesome is pretty laughable.

Posted by Greg on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 9:58 am

..during which sheriffs quite often rightly refused to evict the poor.

There have also been cases of this in current times. And we need to encourage far more of them.

Posted by Eric Brooks on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 12:09 pm

Greg X,

Use your real name Kamin, I thought I broke you of that when you hid behind the 'Westside' bush for years. I notice that when you don't use your real name that your posts get more obscene and vacuous.

Who can lead the troops? In a vote of 355 fellow employees, Miyamoto got 353 votes and Ross got 2. Ross pandered in the extreme to the cops when he was the sole vote in a 10-1 vote to kill the DROP program. Ross went to the right of Elsbernd and Chu to kiss the cops' ass and they didn't endorse him anyway. The man has no ethical compass. You only get off your knee pads long enough to admit that him abandoning the D-5 seat to the likely bottom of London Breed might not be a good thing for Progressives.

After you start using your given name proudly again, Greg 'X', get a single member of Ross' staff over the last 8 years to post with their own name and deny that Ross is an egomaniac and an abusive boss.

Just one?

Can you believe the NIners beat the Eagles?

h.

Posted by h. brown on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 3:01 pm

Again, h, I have no idea what you're talking about in the first paragraph.

As far as the second... I could care less what the cops want. I know they want one of their own, so that person can cover for them. That's exactly what this city does NOT need. I do care about Hennessey's endorsement. He did a damn good job, he was able to do it in part because he was never an insider, and the cops never liked him. If he says Ross is the best candidate, that's an opinion I find valuable (unlike yours).

The D5 thing does bother me, and again, that's why I'm having a tough time with this. I acknowledge that. That's the ONLY thing giving me a tough time. But when someone tries to tell me that a mid-level hack like Miyamoto is a better fit to lead the sheriff's department than Ross... be serious h.

And by the way, I could care less about the niners, fivers, eagles, or hawks, seagulls, giants, midgets, whatever... that shit makes you look like a total joke.

Posted by Greg on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 3:49 pm

The sheriffs are not "troops." They're civil servants who work for the people of this city. The paramilitary mentality held by the likes of Miyamoto and Cunnie has no place in this city.

Posted by Greg on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 3:57 pm

That "paramilitary" mindset is a given amongst law enforcement.

Posted by Guest on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 4:23 pm

Nonsense. Hennessey is not a 'paramilitary' nor is the Sheriff's department under his leadership.

Hence, the wisdom of electing a progressive like Mirkarimi instead of a cop.

Posted by Guest on Oct. 02, 2011 @ 4:41 pm

Ross is a great guy, and a good Supervisor, but has no law inforcement nor jail experience.
He won't have any thing to do with the marijuana dispensaries, he has so avidly supported as SF Supervisor, so as Sheriff it makes no sense if that is your reason for voting for him.
Look at when this article was written: May 2011.
Chris Cunnie had dropped out of work and office due to the tragic death of his child: everyone who worked with him and knows him knows that, and knows that he was and is best suited, trained, equipped to be Sheriff of San Francisco.
Michael Hennessey knows that: and had he not thrown his support behind Ross, he would (and does, believe me) support Chris Cunnie for Sheriff.
Chris decided he would enter the race on the very last day he could declare his candidacy: too late for Hennesseey to endorse him. Mike Hennessey is a man of his word and could not and would not un-endorse Ross so that he could endorse Chris Cunnie: but we already know that Chris Cunnie is the best candidate for San Francisco Sheriff.
I truly hope that people see and know that, and that he wins tomorrow.
The entire Sheriff's Department is hoping and praying that he does, to carry on the great progressive work that he has been trained to do under Mike Hennessey, which Hennessey in his brilliant career, established in San Francisco: one of the most humane jail and prison care systems in the country. Thank you Mike Hennessey, for your years of devoted dedicated and caring hard work and service. And may the voters see who you would have chosen if you had known Chris would finally run, and vote for him and elect him tomorrow.

Posted by We already know that Chris Cunnie is the best candidate on Nov. 07, 2011 @ 4:16 pm

That's all voters need to know - we don't need the job to be politicized.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 07, 2011 @ 4:28 pm

If Mike Hennessey wanted to endorse Cunnie, he could have. It's disingenuous to say that he would've endorsed him had he known Cunnie was running. He could've endorsed Cunnie second even though he'd already backed Ross, nothing was stopping him from doing that. But he didn't. He chose to endorse *only* Ross.

The Democratic Party also chose to endorse only Ross, as did every liberal and progressive organization in the city. The Republican Party endorsed Miyamoto and Cunnie. I'm going with the Democrats.

Cunnie and Miyamoto are the preferred candidates of the Republican Party, the realtors (who also endorsed them both), and the Chamber of Commerce. We need an outsider who will keep the department accountable, someone like Mike Hennessey, who was an outsider like Ross, who was NOT a cop, who didn't get the endorsement of the police or sheriffs when he ran, and nevertheless did a fantastic job, even according to those who disagree with his endorsement of Ross.

Hennessey did so good of a job, that Cunnie and Miyamoto are tripping over themselves to associate themselves with his name. But make no mistake, Hennessey specifically, deliberately made one and only one endorsement. That's the one I'm going with -Ross.

Posted by Greg on Nov. 07, 2011 @ 5:01 pm

We need someone who actually understands the job.

We don't want someone to learn by mistakes.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 07, 2011 @ 5:38 pm

VOTE FOR PEDRO!!!

Posted by OMGYOUGUYSGOSH on Nov. 07, 2011 @ 10:31 pm

....OR CISCO OR PANCHO

Posted by Patrick Monk. RN on Nov. 07, 2011 @ 11:26 pm