On what the hell happened with SF medical marijuana last week

What will this mean for the future of SF dispensaries? Without a doubt there will be many more angry phone calls from patients. But it's already having legal ramifications. The memo was a response to an objection from a dispensary's attorney who was perturbed by an incident in which the collective's delivery driver was arrested by law enforcement en route to making a delivery. Gascon's assertion that the entire business was illegal was surely not the reaction the attorney had hoped for.
Related articles
An original member of the Black Panther connects the dots between marijuana access and justice
Weed vs. cancer, Fiona Apple vs. fascists
Also from this author
Public street art as private purchase? Banksy's Haight Street rat turns up in Miami
Most Commented On
Recent comments
- There was an "aggreived party", JW, and you said it yourself: - May 23, 2013
- I don't know who, or how - May 23, 2013
- Weiner - May 23, 2013
- You're not seeing many "moderate" posters here? - May 23, 2013
- No, Nothing Wrong - May 23, 2013
- Yes, IOW it's the NIMBY, anti-progress idea that - May 23, 2013
- Funny how you defend people who have to leave the city for - May 23, 2013
- I agree, but it's good to see Greg defending the successful - May 23, 2013
- You read wrong. I only said that I understand city policies that - May 23, 2013
- Not every sex crime on the statute book involves actual sex. - May 23, 2013









Comments
Post new comment