CAREERS AND EDUCATION: Bay Area professors sound off on changing majors
If had to re-start your academic career today, what would you study? In this era of budget cuts to education and general economic miasma, some Bay Area academics would be reconsidering their options, some would stay their course — and some have important advice for today's budding scholars.
MELINDA STONE, UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
I would first take some time off from school, jump into the world, and try it out for a year or two. I would WWOOF (Willing Workers on Organic Farms) around the country and around the world. Once I had some out of school experience, I would be ready and willing to pursue a higher education — not just because my parents or society said it was the thing to do, but because I was excited and eager to learn more. I would study urban agriculture — funnily enough, my colleagues and I just created an urban agriculture program at USF. We need to be thinking and engaging critically and creatively to shape our urban spheres into sustainable systems. Programs like urban agriculture are doing just that.
JAMES MARTEL, SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR
I'd ideally do exactly what I am doing now: studying political theory. I really love my job and feel very grateful that I get paid to do this. However, I don't think that I could have had the career I had if I was starting out today.
What I'd probably do is to bolster my study of political theory with more courses in continental philosophy and critical thinking, that way I could present myself to more kinds of jobs and broaden my reach. I also think it would help to focus on something concrete — an area study, a specific tradition, a specific thinker, because I think generalists don't do so well these days. In graduate school I would concentrate more on publishing and going to conferences than I did when I was getting my own Ph.D.
When I was in grad school, the belief was that we lived in a meritocracy and good work would get good jobs; even then (the mid-'90s), the profession was changing, but I didn't pay any attention and got lucky. Not that I had it that easy, I was a visiting professor at three universities before I got a tenure track job. Even so, I don't think a newly minted Ph.D. can have the same luxury anymore. Today you can't hide in your ivory tower. My younger peers are much less starry-eyed about academia than I was at their age. Maybe that is one small silver lining to the horrendous academic job market.
VINCENT BARLETTA, STANFORD UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
IBERIAN AND LATIN AMERICAN CULTURES
At the end of Don Quijote, the eponymous main character emerges from his book-induced delirium, renounces chivalry, and dies. I'm not ready to die, so I'm reluctant to imagine a career course other than the wholly quixotic, book-filled one that I chose over two decades ago. The Quijote teaches us that all imagining has consequences. If I begin to imagine another less difficult life, what will become of me? Will this life begin to crack and splinter? While I'm not simple enough to believe that flirtations and daydreams can hasten death, why tempt fate?
If imagination is a lethal pin, history is a cushion. When I was a kid growing up in the East Bay, an aluminum bat under my bed and a stack of bootlegged Elvis Costello cassettes in a shoebox, I dreamed of being lots of things: a private eye in Honolulu, a blade runner, the president. I dreamed of a playing guitar like Marc Ribot. Of being rich. Does Barack Obama play guitar? If so, he's realized all of my adolescent dreams, and I hope they make him happy. As for my life, Don Quijote was born only for me, and I for him.