Scenes from the struggle for economic justice - Page 2

Oakland's Community Democracy Project, Bangladeshi sweatshop activists, California domestic workers, and more May Day warriors

At an April 25 rally in SF, Bangladeshi activists fight for 112 workers who died in a fire making garments for Walmart.

Making job-training programs actually work

The phrase "welfare" may conjure up the image of a couch potato catching up on daytime soaps while the checks roll in, but Karl Kramer of the San Francisco Living Wage Coalition says it's simply not the case — some people are not only working to earn those meager checks, they're faced with few options once their participation in such programs comes to an end.

In San Francisco, many recipients of public assistance are part of the local Community Jobs Program, designed to provide unemployed people with on-the-job experience to help them land on their feet after six months. In practice, however, "it's not happening," Kramer says. "They're dead-end programs. People aren't moving onto jobs, and at the end of the Community Jobs program, they're cut off completely."

Part of the problem is that few pathways exist to connect the workers with actual paid gigs once they've finished. So the Living Wage Coalition is pushing for legislation that would improve and expand upon the Community Jobs Program, by raising the wage rate from $11.03 to $12.43 per hour, giving participants the option of working 40 hours a week, extending the program from six months to one year to square with eligibility requirements for many job listings, and creating an advisory committee to facilitate entry-level job creation in city departments.

"There has not been political will to really make these programs successful," Kramer notes. And in the meantime, "people don't connect it with why there's such a growth of homeless families" in San Francisco. (Bowe)

Basic rights for domestic workers

The California Domestic Workers Bill of Rights would apply basic federal labor protections (such as a minimum wage, the right to breaks, and basic workplace safety standards) to domestic workers. If it becomes law, credit will go in part to its author, Assemblymember Tom Ammiano, but also to the California Domestic Workers Coalition, which has been pushing the issue for years.

Supporters of the bill say it's unconscionable that domestic workers — the people who care for our children and grandparents and tend our homes — are one of just two occupations exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the other being farm workers (another profession with a well-documented history of labor abuses, and also one comprised largely of unpaid immigrants). "We need to have protections for the people who do really important work," Katie Joaquin, campaign coordinator for the coalition, told the Guardian.

As we reported recently ("Do We Care?," 3/26/13), Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed the measure last year after it was overwhelmingly approved by the Legislature, expressing the paternalistic concern that it may reduce wages or hours of domestic workers. But its supporters have come back stronger than ever this year. Now know as Assembly Bill 241, the measure cleared the Assembly Labor Committee on a 5-2 vote on April 24 and it now awaits action by the Assembly Appropriations Committee. They say this bill, which New York approved in 2010, is a key step toward valuing caregiving and other undervalued work traditionally performed by women. (Steven T. Jones)


It seems ridiculous to me that the City wouldn't want to see the energy and money that goes into these programmes actually result in jobs. It feels like once again those who need the government's help the most are the ones being made to jump through the most irrelevant of hoops. Let's face reality and help our fellow city members by supporting these changes.

Posted by HannahMc on May. 02, 2013 @ 7:28 pm

A Living Wage is not a minimum wage. As I teacher I see families where the parents each work two or three part time jobs and barely scrape by. It is essential for workers to have their earning translate into being able to live on what they earn. It is shocking that minimum wages keep workers in poverty . It is time to speak up for
living wages. and support the legislation to do so.

Posted by Mary Jane Mikuriya on May. 03, 2013 @ 5:18 am

business, and so who thinks that workers should be paid according to what they would like, and not according to the value they add.

Posted by Guest on May. 03, 2013 @ 7:19 am

Earned about $62 a month working 11-hour days, six days a week, and earn pennies on the dollar? How would you like to work your ass off for $62.00 a month and risk your life to do it? Or do you think unsafe factories and working conditions are just part of the cost of doing business? If so, you're a pitiful excuse for a human being.

Posted by Guest on May. 04, 2013 @ 3:19 pm

and not whatever they think they need for the lifestyle that they aspire to.

Posted by Guest on May. 07, 2013 @ 7:15 am

For those adults in welfare struggling to pay rent and food it is essential that community jobs program function to way it should be intended with improvements so that these people can at least get back on their feet,pay bills and gain a skill to carry for sustained work career.

Posted by David F on May. 04, 2013 @ 11:13 am

Thank you for the coverage about the Community Jobs Program and the needs of working people to have a wage they can actually live on, especially in the high cost Bay Area. Economic inequality is increasing and it leads to many social problems. I am tired to corporations getting tax breaks while programs for working people and the unemployed are being cut back. The Guardian should expand it's coverage of economic inequality and what can be done about it.

Posted by Guest Linda R. on May. 05, 2013 @ 6:43 pm

Thank you for your very important coverage of the city's Community Jobs Program! The Board of Supervisors are currently conducting an audit of the city's workforce development program and hopefully their review will include the Community Jobs Program given its existing limitations. I encourage the Bay Guardian and Rebecca Bowe to continue covering this story as the audit winds up its work and the findings and recommendations are made known. Again, thank you for your article and please continue to cover this important news item.

Posted by Ronald on May. 07, 2013 @ 7:56 am

business environment. Schemes and programs make only a marginal difference for as long as the city maintains an anti-business tax and regulatory structure.

Posted by Guest on May. 07, 2013 @ 9:54 am

Also from this author

  • Cash backwards

    Ten things San Francisco should fund -- and 10 things it shouldn't -- to create a fair, equitable, and forward-thinking city budget

  • Clean Power SF still moving forward

  • Tale of two parties: Voters reject 8 Washington project