Nice builds

Playgrounds, lookouts, parklets, terminals ... AIA SF Awards highlight cool new architecture in the Bay Area

|
(5)
Richardson Apartments in Hayes Valley

marke@sfbg.com

STREETS ISSUE "Oh, we're doing pretty well right now," a hunky contractor with Cahill Construction said with a wink at a chic party a couple weeks ago. He was referring to the building boom that's hitting SF, its slender cranes teetering across our skyline like a stilettoed bacherorette party drinking its way down Polk Street. In terms of new build, 2010s SF is the new 1990s Berlin (somebody wrap our Reichstag, already). And while some of the design is surprisingly gorgeous, and we thankfully haven't fallen yet for too much trendy starchitect stuff, a lot of it is a bit perfunctory to say the least. For a region that produced visionary architects from A.G Rizzoli to Ant Farm (and the often gorgeous infrastructure of your personal computer), you'd think we could push beyond stacked glass boxes lined in travertine and looming USB-like forms a tad more.

Practicality intrudes, of course, and while we wait for this, one of the richest and most creative places on earth, to develop a contemporary street vernacular to replace those awful '90s SoMa live/work lofts, there's a lot of loveliness hitting our streets, This year's American Institute of Architecture SF Awards, which took place April 25, were abuzz with great, recently completed projects that focused on ground-up design that was practical, sustainable, inventive, and just plain neato. Here are a few winners that caught my eye, mostly because I had seen them in action on my weekly walks through the city and beyond. Their worth a closer look on your own jaunts. (See more winners at www.aiasf.org.)

RICHARDSON APARTMENTS

Designed by David Baker + Partners (snappy sage of green design Baker is SF's closest thing to a starchitect) and run by Community Housing Partnership, this Hayes Valley supportive housing complex is named for Drs. Julian and Raye Richardson, who started Marcus Books in the Fillmore, the country's oldest black book store. It houses 120 formerly homeless tenants as well as several businesses, and its swoop of natural materials and neighborhood-brightening color "seek to repair the site of a collapsed freeway with homes."

 

OAKLAND MUSEUM ENTRY PLAZA

You usually go to a museum to see (worship?) others' creativity: Oakland Museum's interactive entry plaza and event space, designed by Jensen Architects, allows you to express your own. Usable white garden furniture hangs from a giant blackboard — make a space to chill, and write out your thoughts. Simple and stunning.

 

OURCADIA

The parklet movement began in San Francisco in 2010 and has now spread throughout the world, decommissioning parking spaces for more humanely amenable uses. (Maybe parklets are our new native architectural vernacular? Hope so.) Now some of the sharper ones are being institutionally recognized, like this nifty zag outside farm:table restaurant in the Tenderloin, designed by Ogrydziak/Prillinger Architects and Reynolds-Sebastiani landscape architects. Funding by, duh, Kickstarter.

 

HAYES VALLEY PLAYGROUND

Comments

I recall the last time SFBG ran an "architecture" article (it doesn't happen much) and, again, the featured building was either a city building or a non-profit building.

That's right, even with a dispassionate topic like architecture, SFBG simply cannot bring itself to admire any building, no matter how spectacular, if it is privately-funded and/or has a private use.

Posted by Guest on May. 10, 2013 @ 12:09 pm

I don't think the One Kearney lobby was publicly funded -- and I really just chose these ones (you can see the full list at the aia sf site) because they appealed to me. Also, if you think architecture is dispassionate, you don't really get it. It seems even with an article higlighting cool things, Guest commenter needs to take a dig at SFBG.

Posted by admin on May. 10, 2013 @ 12:20 pm

By my reckoning, he cherry-picked only the structures that just happened to be public.

Architecture may have a human component, but it struck me as odd that private structures were rather pointedly omitted, almost as if SFBG just could not bring itself to ever say anything good about private structures.

Prove me wrong here.

Posted by Guest on May. 10, 2013 @ 12:58 pm

Easy to spot One Kearny, there's a photo and everything <3

Posted by caitlin on May. 10, 2013 @ 1:04 pm

7 cites of which 6 are public and one private.

I'd guess that 6/7 of new structures in SF are private-sponsored so that's still quite a coincidence.

Posted by Guest on May. 10, 2013 @ 1:21 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Related articles

  • The zero-sum future

    We can switch from cars to bikes, now. Or we can leave our kids a climate-change disaster

  • Yuh look good

    Guardian photogs capture spring's street style

  • Walls of the Internet

    From back alleys to Facebook walls: the street art-tech connection is heating up -- and changing SF's street scene

  • Also from this author

  • Brilliant exodus

    Arthur Szyk's 1930s Haggadah packs fresh visual punch.

  • Ketchup

  • Saving Yosemite