Whose college? - Page 2

San Franciscans decry loss of City College classes — but will the new "Super Trustee" listen?

|
(9)
Can Super Trustee save City College? Or are the burdens now placed on one outsider too much to overcome? Stay tuned.
GUARDIAN ILLUSTRATION BY ANTHONY MATA

But Susan Hsieh, communications and membership manager for the CAA, says Agrella doesn't seem receptive to concerns about the loss of courses that predominantly serve communities of color.

"I think it's important Agrella maintains a connection with the community," she told the Guardian. At this point, she charged, "I don't think he has."

The Guardian worked with college officials to arrange an interview with Agrella, but it was scheduled for a date after the publication of this article.

Concerned students have started a website, movecitycollegeforward.org, where San Franciscans can submit letters to Mayor Ed Lee asking that their voices be heard. But the public already had a formal system for input with the democratically elected Board of Trustees, and now they are powerless.

 

TRUSTEES WEIGH IN

Rafael Mandelman, a City College trustee, echoed CAA's concern that non-credit classes are being undervalued by City College's accreditation agency.

"That is a real and legitimate concern. I think in Sacramento and at the accreditation commission there is a real bias against non-credit," he said. "The proposals around that have suggested there are people who feel community colleges should get out of the non-credit business."

But now, stripped of decision-making power as a trustee, Mandelman can't look out for those communities.

John Rizzo, Anita Grier, Natalie Berg, Chris Jackson, Mandelman, Lawrence Wong, and Steve Ngo are the elected Board of Trustees at City College, and Shanell Williams is the student-elected student trustee. For the next year at least, they have absolutely no say on what happens at City College. They will hold no meetings, and some were even barred from workgroups.

For about the past year, Agrella sat in on every public Board of Trustees meeting as a Special Trustee, with veto powers of the board. When City College's accreditation status changed, he was promoted to his current position. The Super Trustee now acts with the full power of the college's local board, which makes policy and funding decisions for City College.

One of his first acts on the job was to boot some trustees off their only workgroup.

Anita Grier, Shanell Williams, and Rafael Mandelman were all summarily barred from entering a room with a workgroup that's been tasked with selecting a new, permanent chancellor for City College. Shanell Williams, the student trustee, took to Facebook to denounce the move.

"Today I was barred from the Chancellor Search Committee by CCSF campus police," she wrote. "Student representatives should not be treated like this. I will be talking to the State Chancellor about this bullying and retaliation toward me by Bob Agrella."

Agrella also put an end to the public board meetings, the main forum for members of the public to air concerns about City College. The meetings were broadcast live on the web, and recorded into video and audio formats.

Under the new system, decisions about changes at City College will all be made behind closed doors.

Agrella left Trustee John Rizzo on that chancellor's search workgroup, implying that he had specific disagreements with the trustees he barred. Though Grier and Mandelman can't match Williams for sheer volume of polemic speech, they voiced criticism of the accrediting commission in the past. In a video Agrella released to the public on City College's website, he voiced disapproval for critiques of the college's accreditors.

"I've dedicated my entire life to community college education, but I've never had a more important task than this one," he said. "I'm well aware of the concerns expressed about regional accreditation. It has many facets. If City College of San Francisco remains in the battle for this fight, it won't survive."

Comments

Why do these losers always try and make everything a race issue?

There are poor whites who attend CCSF and there are rich non-whites who do not.

CCSF failed because it is a flawed organization. It should be closed down and something new started up, preferably with private money so it is not a burden on the taxpayer.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 17, 2013 @ 2:01 pm

The productive departments such as culinary arts, paramedics etc. should be spun off and run by other colleges. All other departments/studies should be closed. All assets will be sold to pay off debt. The city and state should assume the outstanding debt not covered by sale of assets. Agrella should work with SF to work out severance pay package for staff and instructors.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 18, 2013 @ 2:37 pm
Posted by Guest on Aug. 18, 2013 @ 2:53 pm

Computer science, physics, math, nursing, medical technology, architecture, computer aided design, biology, graphic design, chemistry, etc, aren't "productive?"

Teaching immigrants to speak English and giving them entry-level job skills isn't "productive?"

Teaching young people and immigrants about the history and government of the US isn't "productive?"

Training people to be teachers isn't "productive?"

Posted by Guest on Aug. 18, 2013 @ 4:52 pm

Perhaps CCSF needs to find a focus and, you know - FOCUS on that. This myriad of different departments just dilutes its ability to be really good in a few select areas.

Posted by Lucretia Snapples on Aug. 18, 2013 @ 5:18 pm

They should be careful what they wish for - Chinese are over-represented in the state's top schools and have a per capita income which exceeds other races. Using the principles of affirmative action we may need to start limiting their enrollment at places like Cal & UCSF and seeking to "redistribute" some of their ill-gotten gains to other, more deserving races.

Posted by Lucretia Snapples on Aug. 18, 2013 @ 4:31 pm

We must immediately start arresting more Asians.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 20, 2013 @ 9:37 am

Potential CCSF closure is a direct result of voter-supported laws affecting tax legislation. California's Proposition 13, voter-driven legislation enacted in 1978, slashed the State tax base for education. Any bill with tax increases requires a two-thirds vote in the State Legislature, limiting success of tax support legislation. Together, these have created educational budgets inadequate to support the institutions in place. Community colleges, the California State Universities, and the Universities of California are unable to meet students' needs for affordable education, communities' needs for education and training resources, and employers' needs for a trained and educated workforce. While it is important to resolve the immediate problems besetting CCSF, new problems will arise if the State voters and administration refuse to fund education.

This basic problem of the State education systems must be attacked at the root. Voters, legislators, and State administrations must act to increase state funding of our institutions of higher education. San Francisco has some of the highest wages in the country; California has the sixth-highest average income in the nation. Continued inaction on the State education tax base will only support the idea that politically active Californians do not care about the quality and availability of public education.

Posted by Guest on Aug. 23, 2013 @ 5:48 pm

It is really interesting what you said, I saw some good colleges there!

Posted by yachtbooker.de on Jan. 09, 2014 @ 2:44 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.