sfbg.com

 

Extra

Andrea Nemerson's
alt.sex.column

Norman Solomon's
MediaBeat

nessie's
The nessie files

Tom Tomorrow's
This Modern World


News

PG&E and the California energy crisis

Arts and Entertainment

Venue Guide

Electric Habitat
By Amanda Nowinski

Tiger on beat
By Patrick Macias

Frequencies
By Josh Kun


Calendar

Submit your listing

Culture

Techsploitation
By Annalee Newitz

Without Reservations
By Paul Reidinger

Cheap Eats
By Dan Leone

 

Our Masthead

Editorial Staff

Business Staff

Jobs & Internships


PERSONALS | MOVIE CLOCK | REP CLOCK | SEARCH

Another airport cover-up

ON JAN. 25 an arbitrator hired by the city of San Francisco cleared giant construction firm Hensel Phelps of charges that it had discriminated against minority-owned Liberty Builders on a contract at San Francisco International Airport. The arbitrator, Lani Bader, concluded that the city's original investigation into the dispute was legitimate and that Mayor Willie Brown had not intervened to squelch Liberty's allegations.

The decision is difficult to understand, much less to support, and it demonstrates that the city's contract-arbitration system is badly in need of reform – as is the entire process by which the city monitors compliance with the laws designed to encourage minority businesses.

Liberty filed a complaint with the Human Rights Commission in 1997 charging that Hensel Phelps had cheated the Bayview-based company out of almost $3 million in airport contracts. Bader, who was paid $40,000 by the city, discounted overwhelming evidence that Brown had personally directed the HRC staff to rule against Liberty's complaint (see "SFO Cover-Up," 8/1/01). Not surprisingly, on Feb. 14 the HRC voted to accept Bader's decision.

It's become perfectly clear that the HRC – a cesspool of corruption if there ever was one – can't and shouldn't be monitoring compliance with the Minority Business Enterprise and Women Business Enterprise laws. Willie Ratcliff, the owner of Liberty Builders and the publisher of the San Francisco Bay View newspaper, suggests that the program be managed by an outside nonprofit; that could be a problem too, and the Controller's Office might be a better solution. In any case, the supervisors need to hold hearings on the issue with the aim of finding a more independent monitor for a crucial program.