May 29, 2002


sfbg.com

 

Extra

Andrea Nemerson's
alt.sex.column

Norman Solomon's
MediaBeat

nessie's
The nessie files

Tom Tomorrow's
This Modern World

Jerry Dolezal
Cartoon


News

PG&E and the California energy crisis

Arts and Entertainment

Venue Guide

Electric Habitat
By Amanda Nowinski

Tiger on beat
By Patrick Macias

Frequencies
By Josh Kun


Calendar

Submit your listing

Culture

Techsploitation
By Annalee Newitz

Without Reservations
By Paul Reidinger

Cheap Eats
By Dan Leone

 

Our Masthead

Editorial Staff

Business Staff

Jobs & Internships


PERSONALS | MOVIE CLOCK | REP CLOCK | SEARCH

Edison's epic collapse


EDISON SCHOOLS SET out a decade ago to privatize public education in America, and unfortunately a lot of educators – and financiers – bought into the plan. Now, as Tali Woodward reports on page 17, the whole operation, involving 133 schools, is nearing collapse. Edison's stock has fallen 93 percent in the past few months, and the company is teetering on the brink of bankruptcy.

And thousands of kids, including 450 in San Francisco, may wind up suffering as a result.

It's a spectacular failure of a spectacularly bad program, rivaling in importance (if not in scope) California's experiment with energy deregulation. And it carries a powerful lesson in the perils of privatization for public officials at every level of government.

Most of the battles over Edison have centered on educational policy and the effectiveness of the Edison model. Edison foes argued that it wasn't possible to provide better classroom teaching for the same money every other school got – and make a profit at the same time. Teachers argued that Edison's cookie-cutter curriculum wouldn't work in diverse school districts among students with different needs. And in almost every instance, those criticisms turned out to be right: test scores at Edison school have been far below promises and expectations, and teachers have fled the privatized classrooms in droves (see "Edison Exodus," 6/19/00).

But there was another problem, one that school districts all over the country failed to anticipate when they signed deals with Edison: the company simply doesn't have a viable business plan. Now those communities – including San Francisco – are stuck with a tricky problem: What happens when the private vendor that's teaching your kids suddenly goes bankrupt? Do the creditors show up and seize the new computers and nice carpeting in the Edison schools? Do the public school districts have to come in – perhaps in the middle of a school year – and take over a school that uses a very different syllabus but suddenly can't pay its staff? How will that affect the students?

The answer: nobody knows.

San Francisco canceled its contract with Edison last year, but the state quickly issued the company a new charter. Now the San Francisco Board of Education needs to begin drafting plans to take back the privatized school – and the state Department of Education needs to prepare a legal strategy to revoke the charter as soon as possible. And from now on, any time anyone suggests privatizing essential public services makes any sort of sense, the response should be simple: remember Edison.