August 14, 2002

sfbg.com

 

Extra

Andrea Nemerson's
alt.sex.column

Norman Solomon's
MediaBeat

nessie's
The nessie files

Tom Tomorrow's
This Modern World

Jerry Dolezal
Cartoon


News

PG&E and the California energy crisis

Arts and Entertainment

Venue Guide

Tiger on beat
By Patrick Macias

Frequencies
By Josh Kun


Calendar

Submit your listing

Culture

Techsploitation
By Annalee Newitz

Without Reservations
By Paul Reidinger

Cheap Eats
By Dan Leone

Special Supplements

 

Our Masthead

Editorial Staff

Business Staff

Jobs & Internships


PERSONALS | MOVIE CLOCK | REP CLOCK | SEARCH

'24 Hour Party People'

Pills, thrills, and bellyaches

THINK OF ROCK'S legacies and it's impossible not to pay lip service to record labels like Sun Studios, Chess Records, Motown, Stax/Volt, and Sub Pop. One name you never hear mentioned among rock's Olympian patron saints, however, is Factory. The Manchester-based label gave the world Joy Division, the Happy Mondays, and the seeds of rave culture via its sister club Hacienda and was renowned as much for its owners' bad business sense and drug-fueled burnout as for its stark, minimalist sound. 24 Hour Party People seems destined to cement the collective's rightful place in the pantheon, but any notion of genuflection or pedestal polishing quickly gets pissed on. Laden with one of the cinema's most unreliable narrators in the form of TV personality-Factory impresario Tony Wilson (Steve "Alan Partridge" Coogan) and brimming with pop art detritus filmmaking (punky Super 8 comfortably cuddles with druggy D.V.), the film is less concerned with facts than with Factory's mythos as a beautiful supernova failure. Director Michael Winterbottom (Wonderland) incorporates Lester-like giddiness, deconstructive asides, and even actual participants from the era (keep an eye out for Mark E. Smith and Howard DeVoto) to correct the film when it "gets it wrong"; realizing any history is subjective, Winterbottom and Coogan continually remind the audience point blank not to take anything on-screen as gospel. One wishes that Manchester itself, the industrial wasteland whose environment was vital to fostering the label's role in the modern zeitgeist, had emerged as a more prominent character and that some narrative strands had garnered more attention (whither New Order's rise?), but any glitches are overrun by the film's gleeful willingness to jettison narrative and biopic concerns in order to hook viewers on a feeling. (David Fear)