In This Issue
THE PEOPLE WHO put together the front pages for both the San
Francisco Chronicle and the San Francisco Examiner thought
the single most important thing that happened in the world May 20 was
the San Francisco Civil Service Commission's decision to give the Board
of Supervisors a pay raise. "Fat Cash for Supes," the front-page
banner in the Ex screamed. "Pay for Each S.F. Supervisor to
Triple," the Chron's top-of-the-page headline announced.
But really, although the timing is terrible, the pay thing isn't that
big a deal. The voters decided last year that the job of a San Francisco
supervisor was a full-time gig, and they approved a City Charter amendment
giving Civil Service the right to set an appropriate salary. The final
number $112,320, or $2,160 a week sounds impressive, and
it's obviously a lot of money, but it's also about what top managers across
the city make.
The only one on the board who is making noise about the "fat cash"
is Gavin Newsom, who is also by far the wealthiest supervisor and the
only one who really doesn't need the money. I agree with Matt Gonzalez:
The city's top policymakers ought to get paid enough money that they don't
have to look for outside jobs, consulting gigs, and other work that's
guaranteed to create conflicts of interest.
Yeah, a lot of people live on a lot less, and the supes could too (they
currently make $37,440, with no health insurance or retirement benefits,
and most work at the job full time). Perhaps, given the
budget crisis and the fact that other city employees are facing cutbacks,
they could offer to take a pay reduction say, of 10 percent. Then
they'd be making $101,088. Or they could take 20 percent less and make
$89,856 and the Ex and Chron would still be all atwitter.
I just can't get that agitated about this one.
• • •
In other news: At press time I got a message from tenant activists who
support Assemblymember Mark Leno's A.B. 1217, a bill that would prevent
landlords from using the Ellis Act to evict tenants from residential hotels.
They're worried that Leno's S.F. colleague, Assemblymember Leland Yee,
won't vote for the bill when it comes up next week. His office was closed
by the time I got the message, but you might give him a call or send an
e-mail and urge him to support the measure.
Tim Redmond