In This Issue
SO THE SAN Francisco Board of Supervisors, with only Tom Ammiano
dissenting, has approved a big, out-of-scale high-rise condo complex for
Rincon Hill. It's the sort of project you'd expect to see coming out of
Willie Brown's Planning Department, which is exactly where it came from:
as Steven T. Jones reports on page TK, the entire process is
a case study in screwed-up urban planning.
But I think there's a larger issue here that has to be discussed. The
Rincon Towers represent an approach to city planning that's become very
popular of late (the neocon columnist over at the SF Weekly, Matt
Smith, is particularly enamored of it). Even the progressives in S.F.
politics like it.
The idea is to build high-density housing near jobs and transit corridors,
to create vibrant street-level neighborhoods on the edge of downtown,
and to get the developers to pay for public amenities that make the area
feel all nice and green and lovely like the Vancouver waterfront. Density
prevents sprawl, or that's the idea, and walk-to-work housing prevents
car travel, all of which is good.
Of course, the Rincon Towers won't make anything in that part of town
feel like the Vancouver waterfront. The buildings are way too big and
bulky. I agree it's nice to have the developers pay for some 400 units
of affordable housing (although apparently much of it won't be on-site).
But here's my question:
Why is San Francisco building any new luxury condos? The city
doesn't need more high-priced housing; we seem to have plenty of that
already. I'd argue we don't need a whole lot more rich people moving in
and gentrifying neighborhoods either. Why are we so enamored of an urban
planning theory (which might not even fit so well in a city that's already
among the densest urban areas in the nation) that we've lost any sense
of proportion, size, aesthetic quality, and the real housing needs of
San Franciscans?
Meanwhile, as Matthew Hirsch reports on page TK, Trinity Properties
wants to demolish 377 somewhat-affordable housing units at Eighth and
Market Streets to build more luxury condos. Sup. Chris Daly has proposed
legislation that would ban that sort of demolition; it's part of a much
more sensible approach to housing, which starts with what this city needs
(more housing for people who aren't rich, so they can stay here and be
part of this community).
Tim Redmond