Talkback
SFUSD's dropout programs
There is no secret ("SFUSD's Secret?," 2/25/04). The San Francisco
Unified School District is aptly concerned about the student dropout rate,
particularly among Black and Latino students. Any allusion to the contrary
is ill-informed.
Rather, the district has marshaled various interventions to tackle the
issue. They include:
• A broad-based community group the Stay in School Coalition
created in February 2003 charged with identifying and implementing
successful strategies to improve student attendance.
• The district's Dropout Prevention Office works vigorously with
parents/guardians and students to negotiate options and decide on the
best placement for the students to succeed.
Further, the district was well within the legal time frame to respond
to the reporter's voluminous Public Information Request. Throughout the
entire process, the district was in constant communication with the reporter,
who indicated that her time frame to receive the requested information
was flexible.
The district provided the Bay Guardian with its official dropout
statistics, which were very slightly different than the figures indicated
in another document which reported preliminary dropout figures. (The preliminary
figures indicated 784 dropouts, which was reduced to 770 students based
on additional information.) It is misleading and irresponsible for the
Bay Guardian to conclude that, on the basis of this small and appropriate
adjustment, "the district doesn't have a solid handle on the numbers."
Sup. Arlene Ackerman has frequently highlighted the importance of keeping
young people in school and ensuring regular attendance by strengthening
curricular offerings, counseling, and after-school activities not
just preventing dropouts. School board members have also highlighted the
disproportionately high dropout rates among Black, Latino, Pacific Islander,
and Native American students.
The New York Times recently reported that Black and Latino students
in New York are less likely to finish high school on time than their counterparts
anywhere else in the nation.
The district, community leaders, elected officials, and others are working
hard to counter increasing dropout rates in our schools. A major, long-term
commitment will be required one that we are prepared to make. On
that, there is no secret.
Dr. Dan Kelly President, San Francisco Board of Education
San Francisco
Tali Woodward responds: I began asking the SFUSD about dropouts
in late January. At the district's urging, I submitted a written request
for dropout information Jan. 30. I indicated that I was open to narrowing
the request but that I would like the basic data by Feb. 4. The SFUSD
sent me a letter Feb. 9 stating it would need a legal extension allowed
in special circumstances. After more phone calls, the district made some
documents available to me Feb. 13, though they did not respond to portions
of my request.
The documents the district gave me showed substantially different
numbers than those contained in an internal district memo I had obtained
from another source. The SFUSD did not explain those inconsistencies by
press time but has since raised questions about the numbers from the
memo.
All of the documents, however, confirm that there has been a recent
surge in dropout numbers. According to annual reports provided by the
district, for instance, there were 502 dropouts in 2001-02 and 770 in
20-03. That's an increase of 53 percent.
As I noted in the story, SFUSD administrators say this increase may
be due to a more concerted tracking effort.
Nancy Pelosi's war votes
Regarding Representative Pelosi: In your very important endorsement issue,
you state as one of the reasons you cannot endorse her, "she voted
for a resolution endorsing the war" [Endorsements, 02/18/04]. While
you might have a Pavlovian response against her, you still should get
your facts straight and give credit where credit is due. Pelosi indeed
lead the minority in fighting against the authorization for war in Iraq
and was instrumental in whipping many votes to her view. A correction
and apology is in order.
Marc Huestis
San Francisco
Tim Redmond responds: On March 21, 2003, Pelosi voted in favor
of a resolution that included the following language: "The president's
use of military force against Iraq is consistent with necessary ongoing
efforts by the United States and other countries against international
terrorists and terrorist organizations."