'Harry Potter and the
Prisoner of Azkaban'
Third time's the charm
THE FIRST TWO films adapted from J.K. Rowling's hugely popular
series got the job done: under the steady hand of director Chris Columbus
(Home Alone, Stepmom, Mrs. Doubtfire), Harry Potter's first steps
into wizardry were glossy, literal, and easy to digest; they also earned
about a kajillion dollars each. Kudos to Columbus and the series' other
producers, then, for daring to shake things up with a new director.
Alfonso Cuarón (Y tu mama también) takes a moodier,
less whimsical approach perfectly suited to Prisoner of Azkaban's
darker story line, which involves an escaped killer with connections
to Harry's troubled past, sinister supernatural prison guards, nighttime
chase scenes, creepy omens, and the like. Even the Quidditch match takes
place during a downpour. Hogwarts seems more real than ever, thanks
to some gorgeous cinematography that fleshes out the school's grounds
and surrounding forest, where several key scenes are played. As in the
previous films, the many special effects are top-notch. But the real
success of all three films, and Azkaban in particular, can be
chalked up to the performances. Of course, the adults are played by
a who's who of British all-stars (new this go-round: Michael Gambon,
subbing for the late Richard Harris as Dumbledore; Gary Oldman in a
brief but memorable turn as the titular prisoner; and Emma Thompson
and David Thewlis, both spot-on as additions to the Hogwarts faculty).
More important, though, the younger cast Rupert Grint as scaredy-cat
Ron, Emma Watson as know-it-all Hermione, and especially Daniel Radcliffe
as Harry all nail it, proving there's room even in the biggest
blockbuster for believability and heart. (Cheryl Eddy)