Sunshine
for sunshine
Open Government Ordinance
gets extensive public airing on its way to the fall ballot
By Matthew Hirsch
Sup. Chris Daly introduced the Open Government Ordinance May 25 and
forwarded it to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee,
setting up what will fittingly be one of the most transparent reviews
of any city legislation.
The ordinance, which would provide greater public access to government
meetings and records, was drafted and revised over several months of
public discussions between community activists and members of the Sunshine
Ordinance Task Force. After the proposed amendments are on file for
30 days at the City Clerk's Office, the Rules Committee will hold another
hearing on them before the Board of Supervisors considers sending
them for a vote in the Nov. 2 general election.
"I could have just sent these changes to the ballot with four
votes [from supervisors], but I thought this item warranted sunshine
through the open committee process," Daly said as he introduced
the ordinance.
Up on the fourth floor of City Hall where the sunshine task force was
meeting that same day, the need to strengthen local government access
laws, known as the Sunshine Ordinance, was evident. Each month the task
force attempts to resolve complaints about city departments withholding
information from the public. Under current laws, however, the task force
can only cite violations of the Sunshine Ordinance; it can't actually
enforce them.
The Open Government Ordinance would change this by granting a newly
formed open government task force or commission the power to
compel city officials to appear at its meetings and to disclose documents
to the public. Among other changes, it would also expand public access
to cover nonprofits receiving more than $100,000 of city funding a year.
Library watchdog Peter Warfield told the task force its inability to
enforce prior decisions has allowed the Library Commission to avoid
complying with a recent ruling against it. The task force determined
last month that the Library Commission failed to give Warfield a draft
of the minutes of its March 4 meeting in a timely manner.
To illustrate his point, Warfield distributed a letter with remarks
from Library Commission president Charles Higueras, who lambasted the
task force at a May 20 commission meeting for not being "fair and
balanced." At the meeting, Higueras said he considers it fortunate
that the task force lacks authority to enforce its decisions.
E-mail Matthew Hirsch at matthew@sfbg.com.