By Bruce B. Brugmann

Carolyn Knee, the poster girl for how the Ethics Commission is unethically treating treasurers of grassroots campaigns, goes once more before the Ethics Commission at a hearing starting at 5:30 p.m. Monday (July 9) in Room 408 in City Hall.

Carolyn and her attorney have reached a settlement of $267 with the commission's enforcement division, which is one per cent of the amount the staff originally recommended.
But public power supporters fear that the reason her case is on the agenda once again is because at least two commissioners intend to raise questions about the recommended amount.

Carolyn, a retiree on a fixed income, found herself threatened with $26,700 in fines by the Ethics Commission for several alleged violations of campaign finance laws during a random audit of San Franciscans for Affordable Clean Energy, the grassroots group that forced PG&E to the ballot in the 2002 public power campaign.
The point: SFACE raised peanuts during the campaign (a little more than $l00,000) while PG&E spent more than $2 million to defeat the initiative, $800,000 in the final days of the campaign (and PG&E didn't report this critical amount until nearly a month after the election.) Knee was fined l4 times what James Sutton, treasurer of PG&E's front group, was fined. And the commission hassled and hounded her for the past five years or so. (See Amanda Witherell's excellent story, "The ethics of Ethics," in the Guardian and on our website and an earlier Bruce blog headed "Free Carolyn Knee! Free Carolyn Knee from the Clutches of the Unethical Commission.")

"San Francisco welcomes five day All-Star wank fest. Who's your Daddy? (On Ammiano's answering machine on Monday, July 9.) B3

By Bruce B. Brugmann

Rick Knee flashed the word from City Hall about 6:35 p.m. Monday (July 9): Carolyn Knee is free!.

In a follow up email that was uncharacteristically short, Carolyn's husband wrote, "The Ethics Commission voted unanimously Monday evening to accept the $267 settlement that staff members and Carolyn's attorney reached.
This concludes the case."

Well, this case may be closed and the long nightmare and high drama may be over for the Knees, who took the brunt of the commission's wrath for the 2002 grassroots public power campaign that damn near kicked PG&E out of City Hall, but their fight was well worth it and the battle for ethics reform goes on. Carolyn's rousing defense even made nice folks out of the commission and staff, at least for one hearing.

By Bruce B. Brugmann

CNN, whose correspondents have been lobbying softball questions to Bush administration spokespeople since the Iraq War began, decided to do a "fact check" of Moore's film 'Sicko' and then ask him some pointed questions when he appeared on CNN's Situation Room on July 9.

Moore was up to the test, and then turned the tables on Wolf Blitzer and Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN's senior medical correspondent, who did the "reality check" on "Sicko." Moore confronted Blitzer about the inaccuracies in Gupta's report and the result was a most animated discussion, according to the media watchdog FAIR.

FAIR, which stands for Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting, laid out the errors in Gupta's piece and called for viewers to contact CNN's Situation Room and demand that they correct the mistakes.

The Moore vs. CNN exchange prompts two rhetorical questions: Wouldn't it be nice to have Michael Moore in the Washington and White House press corps? Wouldn't it be nice to see CNN ask some tough "fact-checking" and do some "reality checks" of the Bush administration and its generals before and during the Iraq War--and now? B3

Click on the continued reading link for the July 11 FAIR report:

By Bruce B. Brugmann

Chronicle Editor Phil Bronstein says the hope to save the Chronicle from its staggering weekly losses is more local news.

So, after the Chronicle once again blacked out coverage of the "Free Carolyn Knee" ethics case,
I sent over some impertinent questions to him (with copies to the Chronicle reporters and editors who ought to be allowed the cover the story).

Why did the Chronicle not cover the Carolyn Knee/Ethics Commission story and why does the Chronicle not cover the regular doings of the
Sunshine Task Force and the Ethics Commission? I am also curious why the Chronicle still does not cover the PG&E/City Hall/Raker Act scandal story and all of its ramifications, including the Carolyn Knee story as to what happened to the treasurer of the public power campaign against PG&E. Why hasn't the Chronicle followed up the excellent stories that Susan Sward and Chuck Finnie did on the PG&E scandal only a few years ago.

No answer at blogtime. The point for Phil and the Chronicle: you can't trumpet local news when you can't cover the angles of the biggest urban scandal in U.S. history. Much more to come, B3

By Bruce B. Brugmann

Coming back from a special meeting of the Inter American Press Association (IAPA) in Santa Domingo,
I was pleasantly surprised to find a solid story on the front page of the Chronicle (Thursday, July 26th) laying out PG&E's sorry record on blackouts.

The head was good: "The Blackout Blues." The subhead was apt: "PG&E leaves customers in the dark more often than the other big utilities in California." The lead was a real lead: ""Pacific Gas and Electric Co. customers encore more frequent and longer-lasting blackouts than other Californians, state data show."
The second graph provided telling detail: "Tuesday's power outage in San Francisco and the Peninsula was no isolated incident. In 2006, the average PG&E customer lost power for more than 4 1/2 hours, according to statistics compiled by the utility and submitted to state energy regulators."

It was prominently displayed with a nice graphic and lots of dramatic white type on a black background.

The reporter, David Baker, with help from Marisa Lagos and Cecilia Vega, did a lot of work to get the story in shape so quickly after yet another PG&E service fiasco.

By Bruce B. Brugmann

Alas. Alas. As predicted by the Guardian, the Bruce blog, and most everybody in and around the Dean Singleton news operations, the bad news was flashed this morning by my reliable source in Contra Costa County in his note and Singleton story below.

This was a major story on yet more news consolidation in the Bay Area, but it only rated a three paragraph burial story on page 2 of the daily digest page of the business section of Singleton's only Bay Area daily "competitor," the San Francisco Chronicle.

Its lively head says, "Chain consolidates newsroom operations," which means in effect "please don't read this story, it is damn boring." Its boiler plate press release coverage says without blushing: "The consolidation of the papers, all owned by MediaNews Group (B3: Singleton) will result in job cuts as part of an effort to eliminate redundant positions, beef up online coverage and save money...The company said that it hopes attribution will cover the staff reductions, but added that layoffs may be necessary...Local news reporting will continue to be supervised by editors at each of the newspapers..." Wow, now that is real enterprise business reporting!

My source wrote by email:

"The following appears today in the business pages of at least the CCTimes and Oakland Trib. Times ran it below fold on pg. 1 of business section; Trib ran on an inside business page.

"I still have the image of Singleton standing in the city room of the Times at the time of the sale, saying staff and editorial direction for the various papers would remain in place. Hah. It won't be long before there is but one newspaper to serve the East Bay, perhaps with zoned editions that are community specific." (B3: my source, a veteran newsman who has lived in the county for years, has yet to be wrong on any of his predictions.)

East Bay newspapers plan to consolidate news operations
Owner of Times says move will improve coverage, efficiency
By George Avalos
CONTRA COSTA TIMES
Article Launched: 07/27/2007 03:05:35 AM PDT

The company that owns the Times said it will consolidate the news operations of several East Bay newspapers as a way to improve coverage of the region and create a more efficient organization.
Starting Aug. 13, all employees of the East Bay papers affected will work under the umbrella of Bay Area News Group-East Bay, said John Armstrong, vice president of California Newspapers Partnership, which owns the publications.
"We are making this change, which integrates three entities into a single operation, to allow us to maximize our East Bay news-gathering capabilities," said Armstrong, publisher of the Times.
The daily newspapers affected by the consolidation are the Contra Costa Times, Oakland Tribune, Tri-Valley Herald, Valley Times, San Ramon Valley Times, East County Times, West County Times, Hayward Daily Review, San Joaquin Herald, Fremont Argus and San Mateo County Times. A number of nondaily papers are also included.
The reorganization will "eliminate wasteful redundancies, streamline management and redirect staff and resources to our interactive services and other priorities, such as watchdog journalism," Armstrong said in a memo he sent to employees of the newspapers.
Job cuts could materialize as a result of the consolidation.
"As we eliminate duplication of effort in our newsrooms, we will reduce the size of the editorial staff," Armstrong stated. "It is our hope attrition will cover this reduction, but there is no guarantee that layoffs can be avoided."
The combined newsrooms now have about 360 employees, said Kevin Keane, executive editor of the Times and vice president for news of the regional news group. Keane will become executive editor of Bay Area News Group-East Bay. Pete Wevurski, who had been editor of ANG Newspapers, will become managing editor of the new editorial organization, reporting to Keane.
The changes come as newspapers nationwide must wrestle with defections of advertisers and readers to the Internet.
"We need to start thinking of ourselves as information companies and not just as newspaper companies," Keane said.
He said he believes the emerging news organization in the East Bay can deploy reporters and other news employees in a way to help the newspapers embrace a fast-changing digital world.
"We can put content online virtually 24 hours a day, seven days a week," Keane said. "We can break news online around the clock."
Although the restructuring of the news industry has brought about painful changes and may continue to do so, Keane suggested the changes also can bring plenty of upside.
"There are a lot of challenges in the newspaper business with advertising drifting away to the Internet," Keane said. "There is also a lot of opportunity to do things in new ways. The challenge for us is to find a balance between our reader demands for online content with our core print business."

Watchdog journalism? C'mon. For starters, the Singleton papers will be covering even fewer night meetings of the local city councils, planning commissions, school and community college boards, and other government agencies in the East Bay and Singletonland. And they sure as hell won't be covering the news or selling ads in a competitive newspaper environment. Alas. Alas. B3, ever more annoyed to find that newspapers, even as monopolies, continue to do such a lousy job of covering the biggest local story on their turf (themselves)

Ed Jew runs in San Francisco to Burlingame marathon. (On the answering machine of Sup. Tom Ammiano on Monday, July 30.) B3

By Bruce B. Brugmann

David Lazarus wrote his farewell consumer column for the July 27th Chronicle under the headline, "Where is the media watchdog?"

Indeed. Lazarus answers his question by quoting Ralph Nader as saying that there will never be another Nader because "the media have lost interest in consumer advocacy as both a story and a calling."

Lazarus says that the "Chron's editors have stood behind this column" and says that "a tip of the hat is due here to Editor Phil Bronstein, Deputy Managing Editor Steve Proctor and, most of all, Business Editor Ken Howe. They took enough heat on my behalf to boil soup."

And yet, despite the fact that Lazarus is a damn good reporter and a strong consumer advocate and claims support from his paper, he was still unable to cover the biggest consumer story in San Francisco history.

Which is, as attentive Guardian readers know, the PG&E/City Hall/Raker Act scandal and how PG&E has cheated the city's businesses and residents for decades out of the city's own cheap, clean, and green Hetch Hetchy electrical power. (See past Bruce blogs and Guardian stories and editorials going back to 1969).