« Previous | Next »

star.gif Mission to Caracas

Chavez snubs IAPA journalists in Venezuela

By Bruce B. Brugmann

(Scroll down for the IAPA press release in English and Spanish on its free press mission to Venezuela)

It was an amusing and telling moment in the history of freedom of the press:

I serve on the executive committee of the Inter American Press Association, and arrived in Venezuela on Nov. 17 as part of a mission to check on President Hugo Chávez's accelerating crackdown on the news media. Chávez had a message waiting for our delegation.

It was a half-page advertisement from the Venezuelan National Assembly, in the big morning Caracas daily paper El Universal, reprinting a copy of a congressional resolution urging the executive branch to declare the IAPA non grata (not welcome) in Venezuela. (Scroll down to see a copy of the ad.)

That set the tone for our mission: The sponsor of the resolution refused to meet with the IAPA's delegation. In fact, no member of the three branches of the Venezuelan government or the National Electoral Council was willing to meet with the IAPA.

However, Chávez, who was plastered all over the papers and television for his trip to Iran and France, did send us a Chavista group called Journalists for the Truth.

The president of the group told the IAPA mission that there was complete freedom of the press in Venezuela, then promptly went outside the room and told the waiting press that the IAPA had been "duped in good faith by the reports prepared by the 'opposition' Venezuela press."

Gonzalo Marroquín, chairperson of the IAPA's Committee on Freedom of the Press and Information, immediately retorted to the press that "it would seem that the journalists were at another meeting."

In fact, the IAPA expressed "deep concern at the instability of press freedom in general and warned of the limited debate and public awareness surrounding planned constitutional reform and called on authorities to create an appropriate framework of guarantees and transparency for the Dec. 2 referendum," according to its press release on its findings.

Earl Maucker, who led the mission as the IAPA's president and editor of the South Florida Sun-Sentinel in Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., noted in a press conference that "the government's unwillingness to talk about issues of press freedom and free speech, so essential to a democratic society, strengthens our belief that there is no real climate of respect, or the tolerance and political will to hold an open and comprehensive dialogue at a time when a major constitutional revision is under way."

The mission met with members of the Venezuelan Press Bloc, a constitutional attorney, representatives of a human rights group, polling experts, the mayor of Chacao, the head of the National Press Workers Union, and other knowledgeable civilians. The mission and its final press conference were widely covered in the Venezuelan print and broadcast press. Marroquín, director of Diario Prensa Libre in Guatemala and a former television newscaster, was most eloquent in debating the IAPA's findings on the government radio and television stations.

There were no violent incidents and no attempts to intimidate nor demonstrate against the IAPA mission. However, Chavez has made it difficult, if not impossible, for IAPA to hold its scheduled assembly next March in IAPA. Three different hotels in three different cities offered to host the convention, then mysteriously canceled their invitations.
Suddenly, two hotels said they did not have enough rooms, the third said it had it had rooms but could not provide meeting facilities. Even the J.W. Marriott Hotel that our mission was staying in asked us to hold our meetings and press conference in a nearby hotel.

Interestingly, after I posted a report on my blog, a self-described Venezuelan named Palomudo offered a comment describing the IAPA as a club of rich media owners.

"Look who owns the media in the USA and ask yourself what they did to convince you of their lies," Palomudo wrote, echoing the Chávez line. "Remember Saddam and the weapons of mass destruction? ... The media is your worse [sic] enemy and people like Bruce B. Brugmann are nothing more than media mercenaries pay [sic] to lie!!!"

Quite a statement, considering the Guardian is one of the strongest critics in the nation of media concentration and has consistently written about and criticized the mainstream media's misreporting on Iraq. As an independent paper with a left-liberal approach, we'd be open to supporting some of Chávez's economic policies of fighting multinational oil companies and redistributing wealth.

But we also believe that all governments — left, right, center, and otherwise — need a free and vigorous press and unfettered public debate. As long as Chávez refuses to accept those essential conditions, we happily stand with the non grata editors and publishers in the IAPA, and the courageous editors, publishers, media, students, and everyone else fighting Chavez for press freedom in Venezuela. B3

bruce's photo.jpg
IAPA Deputy Director RicardoTrotti and IAPA President Earl Maucker touch up the press release on deadline shortly before the IAPA press conference on Tuesday, Nov. 20th.


Click here for IAPA press release (English version).
Click here for IAPA press release (Spanish version).
Click here to view El National ad.

digg del.icio.usspheregoogle

Comments (2)

Vladimir Bravo-Salazar:

The company you keep: Bruggman gets snubbed

It is rather sad and surprising to see a paper that is one of the few progressive printed media in the Bay Area publish a piece like this (Mission to Caracas). It fits the description of a "hit piece" on Venezuela, its participatory democracy, its citizens and its institutions, while feeding into a number of myths that have been widely propagated in the corporate media. These myths are:

A) There is no freedom of the press in Venezuela under Chavez.

The Venezuelan press could not be freer and there is ample proof of this. Just read any paper, hear any radio station or watch TV and you will find a plethora of media that acts more as a virulent opposition party with libel andhalf-truths, while openly advocating the overthrow of a democratically elected government and the democratic grassroots process it supports.

Clearly, Mr. Brugmann did not look at the nature of the coverage of the papers who, ” plastered [Chavez] all over the papers and television for his trip to Iran and France.” If he had taken the time to read the stories, he would have seen ample criticism of Chavez.

In order to see an analysis by FAIR, a media watchdog group, of the IAPA's members role in this see:

1) Coup Co-Conspirators as Free-Speech Martyrs Distorting the Venezuelan media story. (see http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3107)

2) The Myth of the Muzzled Media. (see http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3022)

See http://www.sipiapa.org/members/srchmembers.cfm# for a list of members in IAPA.

B) Chavez's is a dictator.

This myth is fostered by IAPA members in spite of the incontrovertible fact that Mr. Chavez is a democratically elected president with elections closely monitored and certified by the OAS, Carter Center, European Union and many other NGOs. He has increased his support by actually delivering on his promises to the great majority of Venezuelan people who are seeing their standard of living rise. One is left then to deduce that in the IAPA’s logic one must govern for the elite minorities to be a democratic leader whether elected or not.

In order to see FAIR’s analysis of the IAPA's member’s role in this see:

1) U.S. Papers Hail Venezuelan Coup as Pro-Democracy Move. (see http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1111)
2) The Repeatedly Re-Elected Autocrat (see http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3009)
3) The Op-Ed Assassination of Hugo Chávez Commentary on Venezuela parrots U.S. propaganda themes (see http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2796)

Bay Guardian readers may also want to view one of many documentaries that looks at the democratic process in Venezuela, including: The Revolution will not be Televised (http://www.chavezthefilm.com/index_ex.htm)

The piece continues with innuendo when it says: "Chávez had a message waiting for our delegation. It was a half-page advertisement from the Venezuelan National Assembly, in the big morning Caracas daily paper El Universal, reprinting a copy of a congressional resolution urging the executive branch to declare the IAPA non grata (not welcome) in Venezuela." By this, Mr. Brugmann seems to imply that the National Assembly was not the one to initiate this process acting as the autonomous elected legislative power it is, but rather to be carrying out an order by Chavez; thus, giving further credence to the myth that Chavez is a dictator.

It is disturbing to find the Bay Guardian toeing the line of the same big corporate IAPA members featured in the FAIR articles.


The IAPA report among many of its distorted findings reports "the discrimination in the placement of official advertising". This is very interesting since the El Universal newspaper, where the official advertisement that declared the IAPA non grata and that so miffed Mr. Brugmann, is in fact a major opposition (read, anti-Chavez) newspaper.


Brugmann does not seem knowledgeable of how the IAPA, which is just an association of printed newspaper owners (the majority of which are corporations and elites), has played a historic role in undermining true democracy in Latin America. He is not in the right company if he thinks IAPA has credibility in the region. It has been used to punish any government in the global south that gets out of line with the interests of the media owners and the interests of those they represent, usually foreign US and European corporations. It could be that he thought he ought to have been received as an honored and respected guest and got angry when he was not. Now, he is venting for getting, as he says, "snubbed". He just got bundled with the rotten apples in this case, or like in the old Latin American saying: "Tell me the company you keep and I'll tell you who you are".

I honestly prefer to think this is the case and that Mr. Brugmann would be willing to give Venezuela and its government a second chance. I would be willing to put together a delegation of Bay Area activists and take a translator that Mr. Brugmann trusts, so that he would not miss a bit of what is going on, since I get the impression that something got lost in translation.

Sincerely,

Vladimir Bravo-Salazar

rich bitch:

Maybe there should be more democracy at the SFBG and a commitment to ending slave labor or internships as they're euphimistically called.

Post a comment



advertisement