« Previous | Next »

star.gif Danny Boyle on Bollywood, game shows, and Indian fairy tales

SFBG's Louis Peitzman interviews Trainspotting and 28 Days Later director Danny Boyle on the eve of the release of his latest flick, Slumdog Millionaire

slumdog1.jpg
L-R: Dev Patel and Anil Kapoor. Photo by Ishika Mohan

San Francisco Bay Guardian: Slumdog Millionaire is a very colorful and vibrant film. Obviously much of that has to do with the art direction and cinematography, but what was your role, as a director, in creating that look?

Danny Boyle: It was all linked to the central approach of this, which is, we didn't try — because you can't, is the real reason — to control it or recreate bits of it or change it. You've got two approaches as far as I can see. You either stand back and look at it sort of pictorially, which I didn't really want to do. We did some tests like that and that is an approach, and you can see that, especially in photography about India. It is extraordinary to look at sometimes. But I didn't really want to do that. I just wanted to dive in there and I thought that by the time the story's over, you'll have got that pictorial sense of it. You'll have accumulated it rather than actually be introduced to it bit by bit. So that was the idea, that we would film on the streets, use live sync sound as much as we could, and actually not change things, not redesign things, and if they did change, which they did — they'd change in front of your eyes, literally — we'd go with that change. So there wouldn't be any obsession with continuity, like there is normally on films. And we just accepted the fact — if you see it again, you'll notice there are lots of people looking at the camera, and there's guys saying, "No filming here" to the camera, things like that, which are all left in. And you just go with that as an approach, and you benefit from it. It drives you mad in one sense, in the controlled, precise think, but in the other way, you get life. You get a sense of it, or I hope you do. You get a bit of the flavor of what Mumbai is like as this electric city. So that was the idea; that was the approach.

SFBG: Going back to what you said about people looking into the camera and other moments like that, it feels like the movie goes back and forth between fantasy and realism. It's almost a fairy tale but with elements of real life. Was that something you were going for?

DB: It's just India, that. Their movies are fantastical, kind of like ridiculous things, and the life on the street is brutal in one sense, and yet the two sit together. That's the whole point. It's why they sit together really. So you're infected by that. It's so melodramatic, the story, in one sense. It's two brothers, of course — a good brother and a bad brother, and that is absolutely key to Indian cinema. That idea of good brother and bad brother. And they usually lose sight of their mother — their mother is kidnapped or lost — and then they find their mother again at the end when they're reconciled. But the bad boy has to die. And then there's always this thing about eternal love, which is also key to cinema there, which is this everlasting love that's pure and will overcome all obstacles. So those are the kind of things that you kind of get infected by. It's a bit like coming to America and you make a crime film, because crime and the way the country's been built, crime has been so linked to the way the country's been built, so inevitably, there is a reason why there's so much crime in American movies, why it's so key to American movies, because it's a part of the culture.

dannyboyle.jpg
Director Danny Boyle. Photo by Ishika Mohan

So you end up, as a foreigner coming here, your film would be partly about crime inevitably. There are certain things that you just accumulate from the place, and you can't resist or avoid. And Simon [Beaufoy] got that in the writing; he got that partly from the book, but also from his own experiences, 'cause he toured India 20 years ago and he'd always wanted to write about it and never been able to find a key way in. He'd always wanted to write about it, and like me, he'd never wanted to do a Westerner in India. And I would never do a film like that. I don't want to watch Western guys wandering around India or anything like that. I sort of made a film like that, The Beach (2000), and I found it a very unsatisfying way of dipping into a country and just taking from a country for your own purposes. I much prefer to go there and try to submerge myself and the story in the place, and then come out of it. There are problems because studios say, "Well, there's no white guys in it, there are no recognizable names," but that's the way things are gonna go. Fortunately, I think that more of the world is opening up. We're gonna hopefully share more in a way. I think that's the way it's going.


SFBG: Were there any Bollywood movies in particular that inspired you, or was it just sort of a general Bollywood feel?

DB: General Bollywood feel. There's three particular ones, but they're not really Bollywood movies. There's no song and dance in them, and they're quite serious thrillers. There's one called Satya (1998), which is written by and performed by the guy in our film who plays the fat police sergeant. He's called Saurabh Shukla. He's an amazing writer and performer, and he wrote this film Satya, which is an amazing film. And there's another film called Company (2002). It's about the gangsters in Bombay, and the way [they run their business] from Dubai. And then there's another film called Black Friday (2004), which is about some bombs that went off in Bombay. And that's made by a young filmmaker called Anurag Kashyap, and that is excellent as well. So they were inspirations in a way, and then there's the Bollywood films, and they are a great mixture of some amazing sequences and some things that you find very difficult to tolerate because your custom is so different, when you're watching them. Because of the length of them and the song and dance in them, and the standards of some bits of it are — you find them a bit lacking. There's some wonderful stuff, though, to watch. Really inventive stuff, within a kind of mess sometimes.

SFBG: There's that whole song-and-dance Bollywood sequence in Slumdog Millionaire, and it feels so perfect and so unexpected at the same time.

DB: You have to do it, really, if you're there. You can't honestly live and work there for — I did about eight months there — you can't really do it and not have a dance at some point. You've got to do it. It just feels natural to do it. It's as natural as, I don't know, showing motorcars in America. You know, if you made a film about America and didn't show any motorcars, it'd be like, what? It's so natural. It's like air, really, and you've just gotta do it.

SFBG: You've done all these different genres and set them in different cultures. How do you immerse yourself and educate yourself about the cultures in order to properly reflect them?

DB: You never can fully, obviously, because you are an outsider, but obviously you hope to harness the fact that you're an outsider as well, because I think sometimes people live in cities — I certainly know, with me in London — and you don't appreciate what you're living in, because you take it for granted and it's just annoying, because it's your day-to-day life. I hope some of it is fresh because it was an outsider coming in, looking at it. But I just try and look from inside, really, as much as possible. That's all I was interested in doing, was trying to see it from inside. And I wasn't trying to impose anything on it. Obviously we had a story, but I would change bits of the story where necessary, if it felt like it was fake or it wasn't true to the people or the way they lived. So we just tried to see it from inside. Having said that, it's a classic international story, isn't it? It's an underdog who has a dream and he'll get to that dream. And it's fortunately got this device, the [Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?] device, the show device, which is universal now, ironically. It's everywhere. They're starting one in Afghanistan, supposedly. So that helps us kind of universalize the story as well, or make some of it recognizable, really, in a way. It gives you a base that you can acclimatize from for everything else, I think, and that helps us.

SFBG: You mentioned working with several unknown actors, several of whom are children. What are the different approaches to working with younger, less experienced actors, especially when they're doing some very serious scenes?

DB: Well, you have to respect them and tell them what the scene is, so they know what's going on. And they're good actors — you pick good actors — they're able to do it. The problem with little kids is they get tired. When they can't focus, you can't create focus. They just can't focus; that's it. It's gone. They're too tired, and they can't understand why you want to do it again: "We've just done it. Why do you want to do it again?" And you've just gotta send them home and bring them back the next day and hope you can do it again. The middle-aged [young] ones, there's a scene where obviously [the character] Salim takes [the character Latika] and clearly takes her virginity. And that's a big thing in India, especially for teenagers, discussing that. But, you know, you're honest and you don't hide things from them. You deal with respectfully and openly about stuff, and I think they enjoy doing it. You involve their parents in it so they all know what's going on and there's nothing secret being kept from people.

slumdog2.jpg
L-R: Dev Patel and Freida Pinto. by Ishika Mohan

And then you just hope that your energy and your love of the story or the situation will inspire them to do it likewise. And you want feedback from them as well, which you can get, saying "I'd never do that; I'd do this." So you learn off people as well. You've got to stay open to it. You can't go there thinking, I'm going to teach these people how to act, or anything like that. It's like, you're going to learn about different skills in acting from working with them, which I did. I found them — and they should be as well; they make a lot of movies — so they really know how to do it. And they love Bollywood movies, obviously, and they make them, but they also love Western movies. They have one eye on Western movies, quite big ones usually, the bigger ones. But they do love Western acting as well; they respect it, because they realize it's a bit more subtle than their type of acting, and they respect it. They kind of look up to the big titans, to Al Pacino and Paul Newman, as was, and Robert De Niro. They know all about them, and they've got their eye on them.

SFBG: Returning to some of the difficult scenes. How true to life are these moments, like the blinding, of violence inflicted on street children?

DB: Well, if you go, you very quickly will get somebody coming up to your car at a traffic light, and somebody will knock on your window and you can see clearly that their hands have been cut off, both hands have been cut off, at some point in their life. They've been cauterized and everything, and they've done that to make them better beggars. And you have to get your head around that. It's appalling and it's like an earthquake in your mind, morally, but it's of no value to that person or to you, really. If you want it to be a value, then you leave and you take away your shock with you, but otherwise you have to kind of accept it, like that person has done, and decide whether you're gonna give them money or not.

And everybody tells you don't give them money, because money they will just give to gangsters who run the street corners. And so you're just funding gangsters, so what are you gonna do, and so you say, you'll take around food, because the food the gangsters probably won't want. And you have to see it from their perspective. India is really interesting, because those who are successful have a greater sense of the complete opposite, of those whose fate is very poor, as we'd see it. And there is a respect there that we lack, certainly, that we don't have in that way. Maybe [San Francisco] respects its homeless more than a lot of towns, but there they do respect them, and they realize how blessed they are by their fortune. And the person whose hands have been cut off regards their fate as being something that they accept, that that is what life has given them. So you can't impose a morality on it. It's pitiful, that morality, and it doesn't get you anywhere, really. So, yes, it does happen, clearly.

SFBG: On a much lighter note: other than universalizing it, what do you think the game show aspect brings to the film?

DB: It's funny, isn't it? It's like a garden weed, [Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?]. It'll take over, if you let it, 'cause it's got this hypnotic quality, the music and stuff like that, and that's why it's such a success. It's like a drug. It gets into your blood stream and you can't stop watching it, and it gives you a kind of short-term pleasure. But it wastes your time, kind of like a cheap magazine takes your time away. I suppose what it does is it's a good shorthand to allow people access to what is apparently a strange culture. It's also got an idea in it about the new India and the way the West is exported, this capitalist idea which now India is chasing, along with the other tiger economies. And it is the definition of capitalism, isn't it? The problem we've got at the moment is that capitalism has to expand. If it contracts, it's in crisis, which we are now suddenly in a period of contraction, and that's a massive crisis. It's never in crisis if it's expanding.

And that show is an expansive show — you make more and more money, and it grows and grows and grows, like that. And if that's what we've exported, that's why India's got it, that's why China's got it. It defines a type of economy. So it stands for that, really, and then when you see [the character Jamal] looking at the new buildings and stuff like that, it fits in with that, which is that, the world has decided — I mean, even China is capitalist now; it's an authoritarian capitalism, but it's capitalist, really. Russia's gone that way. No wonder that program is exported everywhere now, including Afghanistan. That makes sense, doesn't it? It would be there as well. What you have to be careful with, in story terms, is you have to stop it taking over, which is a balancing act. We had to make sure you didn't feel like you were watching Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? all the time. We had to cut it back and control it, really, because it just seeps everywhere. You can't stop it. It's weird. I remember the first cut, which was like three hours, it was just the fucking show. It was like, oh my God, I'm fucking watching all this, so you hack it back and get it out of the way. It's just a tool to help you get to the people, and that's all.

Slumdog Millionaire opens today in Bay Area theaters.

digg del.icio.usspheregoogle

« Home | More Pixel Vision Entries »

Post a comment



Recent Comments

nadia: I read one article that said people from the area where they shot Big Fi...

Whitney Roe: She rocks!!! so chic, yet inventive!!!...