« Previous | Next »

speaker.gif Hey, did Gavin think about this?

We know at this point that Mayor Newsom didn't seek legal counsel before he decided to ask for everyone who runs anything in town to resign. If he had, and he'd thought about it a little bit, he might have discovered what City Attorney Dennis Herrera did: This could cost the city big money.

I'm not talking about lawsuits by forcibly resigned employees -- Newsom had ever legal right to do what he did. No, what's fascinating is a two-sentence note at the end of the city attorney's seven-page opinion on the mass resignations. It says:

"The resignations of certain department heads or commissioner may present other legal issues for the City depending on the particular facts and circumstances. For example, There could be questions about whether to make public disclosures under certain City bonds or municipal debt issuances."

What that means is that the city might have to notify the financial markets -- the bond holders and brokers -- about the mass almost-firings, the same way a company that holds public debt would have to notify debtors that all of its senior staff had resigned.

If the bond-rating agencies decide that a mass exodus of all the experience and talent managing the city is a bad thing for San Francisco's financial stability, we could see a downgrading of our bonds -- and that could cost us a lot of money.

I wonder if Gavin ever thought about that.

digg del.icio.usspheregoogle

« Home | More Politics Blog Entries »

Comments (5)

james:

uh, excuse me...

anyone that does not live here knows how fucked up we all are in head and that mass resignations could be the best thing to happen to any sitting administration

we are all guilty of smoking our own poles so to speak

i bet our credit worthiness goes up, not down

just with we could force all the stupidvisors out too

notjames:

um james, he's apparently firing people he already hired, so does that mean he's not good at picking out people?

and don't forget, he has already said no one is going to go to the unemployment office - they'll just get another job with the city.

swiss cheese, meet SF city politics...

Jerry Jarvis:

He should of used the word re-organize.

Yes, he's firing people he hired, which raises questions about his management. But he's also taking the wimps way out -- asking everyone to resign instead of simply firing the people he wants to fire.

This does not speak well for the way the city is run.

ChristopherX:

If we could get rid of all of the Democratic machine hires, and replace a chunk of city employees with private contractors, maybe we'd be on to running the city with the residents and taxpayers in mind.

SF needs to ditch about half it's employees and start looking at how to run things better.

Gavin has every right to start with a clean slate in a new term, and asking for resignations isn't that unusual...

Post a comment



recentcomments.gif

ninz: I really appreciate this post. The idea that people of color are to be ...

GrrrlRomeo: It's not any voters fault. There is no reason to expect the majority of ...

Disgusted: I find it DISGUSTING that all minority groups that were responsible for ...

anon: The right to speak without fear of falling afoul of hate-speech laws out...

umbrellaBuddha: kdk: I think your fears are being pushed by exaggeration. A train connec...

kdk: that does sound good. it's too bad you also have to imagine stopping at...