The endless budget deficitOf course Gavin Newsom knew that a budget problem was ahead. He sees the figures. He also knows that it's not about the economy or the looming recession; as Controller Ed Harrington put it, "our revenues here in the city are doing fine."
That is, the revenue is on track, on budget, as predicted.
The problem is that the revenue San Francisco brings in isn't enough for the level of spending. It's no surprise: The city has to give its key employees nice raises, as Newsom did, because it's so expensive to live here. City payroll is going to keep going up as long as housing prices do -- and as long as Newsom doesn't address the real housing issues.
All the talk of a hiring freeze and cutting out middle managers is nonsense; it won't go anywhere. And sure, there's fat in the city budget, but not $250 million worth. If Newsom were honest, he'd admit there's a real structural problem here:
San Francisco voters want extensive public services (and that's fine). City officials want to pay employees well (and they should). The city is trying to put resources into all sorts of problems that the federal and state governments have ignored (and that's just not going to change).
To make it all work, we need more money. About a quarter billion dollars a year. Once you admit that, you can start talking about how to find it -- who has to pay more taxes. But as long as you're in denial, the problem will never go away.
digg •
del.icio.us •
sphere •
google
•
Comments (1)
I think that the most obvious ways of fixing the budget problem would be to re-institute the gross-receipts tax and to have a housing-transfer tax for houses of $2 million+ (although $1 million+ would be ideal). Of course, Ichabod isn't about to get on board for either of those initiatives so he'll just cut services for the homeless and the poor so he can he can continue to find an easy and popular scapegoat for his glaring failures. It's a perpetual motion process.
Posted by expatriate | December 3, 2007 08:58 AM