« Previous | Next »

speaker.gif Tearjerkin' for Obama

Here we are, awash in the shivers and shudders of another (incredibly fatiguing) election cycle. And although reports are streaming in of another Hillary sob session, the big news on the gushing front is that new star-studded "Yes We Can" vid, produced by Black-Eyed Pea frontman will i. am (ew) and Bob Dylan's son Jesse, featuring several earnest Hollywood and Billboard players singing along to Obama's semi-concession speech in New Hampshire.

Dammit, it made me weep a little, despite the fact that the incredibly high-flown rhetoric is a bit suspect (Obama's really twisting the King gears here) and has absolutely nothing to do with how, exactly, "we can." Other than voting for Obama with the stars?


700,000+ YouTube views in 48 hours can't be wrong

Question: What would a John Kerry number have sounded like? Why, oh why, did Dan Fogelburp have to die?

Alas for my enthused bandwagonismy, I foolishly, delightedly lived through the age of Live Aidquarius, and was bonkers as a child over the intensely disingenuous, not to say slightly racist, "Do They Know It's Christmas".

The sighs and wonders of celeb-filled promotions can be a bit shortlived, especially when the travails of the task at hand actually intervene. (Will Scarlett Johansson stick around long enough to deal with pork futures earmarks or, like, whatever? Maybe.)

Of course, Obama's whole audacious thing is about cutting through such historical-minded cynicism, although he -- and the other candidates touting change -- has no problem accessing historical markers when it suits. Clinton's reliving the 90s, Obama's reliving the early 60s, McCain's somewhere in Brigadoon (let alone over the River Kwai), and Romney's sitting in some Robert Longo-decorated boardroom in the 80s when he's not stuck in a little covered wagon making its slow way across the salt flats.

Only Ron Paul has escaped the wriggly vise of Clio -- and that's because he lives on the moon, a decidedly non-diurnal entity.

I adore the idealism of Obama, and it's real inspirational to be pounded over the head with the MSM's whole "neglected voting youth energized!" schtick. (Um, all the young people I know can't wait to raise their voices, Obama or no.) And hey -- someone's doing something! But just for a few giggles, let's compare "Yes We Can" with "We Are the World." Now that Lionel Ritchie's saved Africa from starving, it's all in good taste. Celebrity power, activate!

digg del.icio.usspheregoogle

« Home | Archives »

Comments (4)

Deborah Giattina:

I am so voting for the wonky lady. Nerdy brain power is what inspires me. Obama, stop cribbing from King and get your own schtick. Then we'll talk.

OBAMA LOOSES JOBS FOR MINORITIES:

OBAMA LOOSES JOBS FOR MINORITIES
Ms. Obama, VP Chicago Hosp, that charges minorities 6 times as much, isn’t cold hearted enough, she also caused hundreds to loose their 11.hr jobs, to be more efficient she said! In 05, elected to the BOD Westchester-based TreeHouse Foods, she received $12,000 and $33,000 from a subsidiaries, in Nov announced closing its La Junta, plant, that claimed the jobs of 153 workers, most of them Hispanic! Huge blow to a rural town jobs paid a starting wage of $11hr, Company pays top execs like MICHELLE OBAMA tens of millions a year while destroying middle-class America. Raises the question not only about corporate values but about Barrack Obama's own values. Specifically, while he bashes Wal-Mart, why does his wife, make $45,000 and up a year serving on the board of Chicago comp that pays her a very hefty amount of money while laying off mostly minority workers in economically deprived areas? No. 1 customer is Wal-Mart???

Hailey:

Obama criticized again for going negative and misleading on Clinton
Does Sen. Obama think that using divisive GOP tactics is the way to bring the country together? Len Nichols of the New America Foundation said he is "personally outraged at Obama camps recent mailer attacking Clinton! Obama trying to stop health care for everyone! Once again He‘s caught in lies from the debate. Obama showed vindictiveness and lack of magnanimity after his victory SC. The first part of his victory speech was deeply unpleasant attack on the Clintons. No graciousness there. And how did he handle defeat in New Hampshire and Nevada? With a combination of denial, petulance and the launching of a successful campaign to persuade the American media that the Clintons were engaged in a campaign of lies about him and, even worse, in a campaign of surreptitious racism. Clinton pointed out, it's not enough to hope and demand change; you had to be able to define what change you want and had to be able to deliver it. It was Obama who introduced King into the debate. Hillarys words were being construed not just as disrespect but as hidden racism. Obama's people was briefing the media to create this impression. The consequence has been exactly what you would expect. In the Nevada caucus, blacks voted overwhelmingly for Obama and non-blacks voted overwhelmingly for Clinton. In South Carolina, the black vote was 53 per cent of the total. Obama secured 80 per cent of it. That's the reason for his overwhelming victory there. He won only 23 per cent of the non-black vote. Contrast this to Iowa, where he won a large proportion of the white vote. It's a tragedy for Obama and entirely his own fault that this has happened. he became "the black candidate
Obama's most effective criticisms of Clinton, she voted for authorising the war, he opposed it from the start but (and this is crucially important) he had consistently opposed the war ever since. This story of consistent opposition over years was a "fairytale" the media had bought into.Obama has managed to persuade the media that this was a lie that he would correct. He hasn't corrected it, because he can't. He has not been consistent in the terms he set himself.
Obama supported Kerry for president, Kerry voted for war and continued to justify his support. Obama said that he did not want to cause Kerry embarrassment so he said that he, Obama, did not know how he would have voted. Isn't this the candidate who's about change, whose whole candidacy is based on a "different kind of politics"? Isn't this the candidate who says the country can no longer tolerate political spin, that lying in the name of political advantage is what's destroying the country? Yet on the very issue he identifies as the biggest moral issue facing America Obama effectively states that he was lying for political advantage.
Obama's calls for hope, for change. but hope to do what, to change to what? He hasn't said yet. He doesn't seem to know. He says that one of the high qualities of leadership is the ability to inspire by words, and he is right. It's a rare ability. But inspire to what end? It's a pity. He promised so much.

Obama said he goofed on votes angered fellow Democrats:

Obama said he goofed on votes angered fellow Democrats in the Senate when he voted to strip millions of dollars from a child welfare office on Chicago's West Side. But Obama had a ready explanation: He goofed! Also announced he had fumbled an election-reform vote the day before, on a measure that passed 51 to 6. The next day, he acknowledged voting "present" on a key telecommunications vote. He stood on March 11, 1999, to take back his vote against legislation to end good-behavior credits for certain felons in county jails. "I pressed the wrong button on that," he said. Obama was the lone dissenter on Feb. 24, 2000, against 57 yeas for a ban on human cloning. "I pressed the wrong button by accident," he said.

But two of Obama's bumbles came on more-sensitive topics, he backed legislation to permit riverboat casinos to operate even when the boats were dockside.

The measure, pushed by the gambling industry and fought by church groups whose support Obama was seeking, passed with two "yeas" to spare -- including Obama's. Moments after its passage he rose to say, explaining that he had mistakenly voted for it.

Obama would later develop a reputation as a critic of the gambling industry, and he voted against a similar measure two years later. But he was clearly confused about how to handle the issue at the time of his first vote, telling a church group that he was "undecided" about whether he backed an expansion of riverboat gambling. And, months earlier, he had voted in favor of a version of the bill.

Obama's vote sparked a confrontation after he joined Republicans to block Democrats trying to override a veto by GOP Gov. George Ryan of a $2-million allotment for the west Chicago child welfare office. being responsible," said Sen. Rickey Hendon, accusing Obama of voting to close the child welfare office.Obama replied "I understand Sen. Hendon's anger, I was not aware that I had voted no on that piece of legislation.

Post a comment



recentcomments.gif

Patrick Monk.RN. Noe Valley: MORE NEWSCUM LIES AND DOUBLE TALK. In the aftermath of the electio...

SFResident: I don't the Guardian would be satisfied with anything less than a gigant...

Henry: As Travis (i.e. Robert Deniro) said in Taxi..."someday a real rain will ...

Shane: OMG - the Guardian actually had pictures of BLACK PEOPLE on its pages! T...

Rapidfire: He did go. He's gone off to the DCCC....

MSF: "By the way, I don't have the luxury to turn to firms like BMW to make t...

Jane: Chris Daly has jumped the shark and now is nothing more than one of the ...

doyle: And the Daly political machine loses one more cog. Chris, it co...

advertisement