Samuel L. Jackson: No on 8, m**f**ers!OK, well not exactly, but he's in the game:
as is Ms. Feinstein:
But where's Arnie? In Ohio, stumping for McCain, sigh. Obama? Anyhoodle, the No on 8 folks just announced another matching funds drive, after malevolent Mormon spiders downed their site. This is your last chance to tell the Knights of Columbus to shove it up their Shriners!
UPDATE: And Bill "DOMA" Clinton!
PS -- And don't think us gays won't remember this -- there will be a TON of kiss-in fun if 8 passes, which it won't, but just saying. I love tonsil-tickling my bf in Catholic churches. Just like the '90s. Bitter? Maybe I am. But the $50 mill already spent on this foolishness could have funded how many food banks?
digg •
del.icio.us •
sphere •
google
•
Comments (4)
The kind of behavior described would hardly be acceptable in public between a man and a woman, why should it be any less rude between a same-sex couple? It's just the type of uninhibited actions we would rather not see promoted by government-sanctioned approval of same-sex marriage.
"The ancient definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman has its basis in biology, not bigotry....As many courts have recognized, the primary societal good advanced by this ancient institution is responsible procreation." (Connecticut Supreme Court Justice Peter T. Zarella)
I am voting YES on Prop 8
Many more reasons to vote YES here
.
Posted by AlexT | October 31, 2008 11:43 PM
It's just the type of uninhibited actions we would rather not see promoted by government-sanctioned approval of same-sex marriage.
I'd much rather surreptitiously watch a couple kissin' while waiting for Muni than blankly stare into the distance cursing my chilly, late fate. No on 8! Yes to public displays of affection! Maybe too many mimosas!
I swear, now someone's going to tell me that same-sex marriage will lead to folks melting down their nipple rings to form a festive golden calf which we'll all be forced to kowtow to as it marches down Market --
Oh wait.
Posted by YooHooligan | November 1, 2008 02:34 PM
Bigotry and hatred are so twentieth century....
AlexT (Alex Tourk, perchance? We can only hope...) and his troglodyte friends must feel like George Wallace these days. In twenty years, LGBT folks will be able to get married everywhere, nobody will bat an eye when it happens, and the trogs like Alex (and his "formerly" polygamist out-of-state friends supporting prop 8) will be stuck in their trailers wondering when the world passed them by.
Posted by joewmorse![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.sfbg.com/blogs/politics/nav-commenters.gif)
|
November 1, 2008 06:39 PM
1. rudeness would be the point. 2. show me this ancient dictionary of yours. 3. should only men and women who can have children be allowed to marry? will you be in charge of that, Alex T? Please, let us know. And then let us start testing immediately. In fact, why not just cast out or stone all "barren" women and castrate all impotent men, keeping them as servants. Maybe that's also in your ancient dictionary. Right next to driving cars and wearing pants.
Posted by Marke B. | November 3, 2008 02:49 PM