« Previous | Next »

speaker.gif Remembering -- and forgetting -- 9/11

By Steven T. Jones
9-11(a).jpg
Do we really know the full truth about what happened on 9/11, the devastating attacks that occurred eight years ago today? Based on my research and assessment of the inquiries that followed that horrific event, I don’t think anyone can claim to know the full truth. But that hasn’t stopped conservatives and know-it-all pundits from demonizing and belittling skeptics of the official 9/11 theory in an aggressive fashion in recent weeks.

The most disturbing example was the truly scary right-wing propagandist Glenn Beck’s successful crusade against Van Jones, forcing his resignation from the Obama Administration mostly for having signed a letter calling for an investigation of whether the Bush Administration ignored warnings about the attacks and then used them to further their foreign policy goals.

Why is that suggestion so outrageous? As even the ludicrously narrow 9/11 Commission investigation (which Harper’s Magazine and other respectable voices dismissed as a whitewash) showed, top Bush officials were warned of impending al Qaeda attacks in the month before they occurred, they did nothing, and then used the attacks to launch their so-called “War on Terror,” even discussing invading Iraq (which wasn’t involved in 9/11) as the World Trade Center still smoldered.

That doesn’t mean that George W. Bush planned the attacks, or that there were controlled demolitions of the WTC towers and Building 7, or any of the theories that are so easy to mock. But isn’t it possible that they made a conscious decision to just stand down, take the hit (in whatever form that took), and use it as a pretext for their well-known plans to go on the offensive? Isn’t that a question worth exploring, if for no other reason than the historical record?

Local media also love to dismiss those who call for a more thorough investigation of 9/11. SF Weekly and the San Francisco Chronicle have recently taken shots at 9/11 skeptics, substituting certitude and name-calling for curiosity and intellectual honesty. I was even dragged into their crosshairs and shot up, even as they refused my advice to read my research into the matter. It’s just so much easier to dismiss and belittle than to investigate.

Listen, I understand that the 9/11 truth movement seems a little nutty, and I think some of their claims are pretty outrageous and many have been credibly disproven. But the conclusions that I arrived at in my Guardian cover story of more than four years ago still hold true today: the scariest thing about this movement is they may be right that more occurred than we know.

This was the biggest mass murder in U.S. history, but it simply wasn’t subjected to the same forensic rigor and evidentiary standards as your average homicide in San Francisco. And given what we later learned about the Bush Administration’s mendacity, immorality, disregard for the constitution and accountability, God complex, and desire for empire, why are we so eager to dismiss all of that and accept the easiest and most benign explanations of 9/11 and what came before and after it?

Barack Obama may want to look forward and not back, but our precarious little empire is built of the foundation of the past. If we’re unwilling to revisit the darker periods of our recent history – 9/11, torture, war crimes and profiteering, economic exploitation, subversion of sovereign governments – then we’ll never regain the moral authority we’ll need for future challenges.

The Right in this country have become belligerent bullies bent on revisionist history, writing alluring fables of U.S. history, nobility, and our “shining city on the hill” -- and smearing those who don’t wholly accept their fantasies. But the truth still matters, and real nobility lies in those who seek it out, no matter the personal cost.


digg del.icio.usspheregoogle

« Home | More Politics Blog Entries »

Comments (17)

glen matlock:

Wow, there isn't anything you won't believe if it's put in the correct connotation is there?

As a subscriber to various skeptic magazines and also as a person who has donated to skeptic causes as well as having a library of books written by various skeptics...

I take offense to your use of the word. Not in a hysterical self righteous screaming liberal sort of way. Not in a "who will save the babies" sort of way, which would be entirely possible and easy considering all the bodies piled up by Islamic nut cases here, but in a more, "what separates you from a creation scientist" sort of way.


Reading your articles and you blog, your skeptical credentials are lacking.

So then, Glen, you aren't skeptical about the official theory on 9/11? You think the Bush Administration did everything it could to heed the intelligence warnings and defend the country, that all errors made that day were purely coincidental, then they responded to the attacks in a forthright manner free of hidden agendas or ulterior motives? And you believe all of that based on the 9/11 Commission's work, the only official inquiry into that day? And how exactly does that burnish your skeptical credentials?
Or is equating my questions with that of a "creation scientist" -- a point I really don't understand -- just an example of the belittlement and name-calling that I discussed?

glan matlcok:

Hanlon's Razor is an eponymous adage which reads:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

also

three can keep a secret if two are dead


On the one hand Bush and company are a maniacal ruthless group of schemers and connivers that can manipulate the dumb masses in a conspiracy at the least involving many dozens.

or

Bush is an incompetent religious imbecile who talks to god and couldn't figure out the most simple of problems.


The conflation into crazy world view on the part of you "progressives" is a bit much? That opportunistic world view takes some serious credulity on your part.

Is Bush and gang capable of getting together the top analysts in various branches of government and talking them into keeping quite? Can he and this juanta stop all law enforcement involved in all the facets leading up to this atrocity? FBI, CIA, Military Intelligence, Secret Service, Border Patrol, state, county, city cops, etc...

Then we should get into planing this all, does Bush and gang kill off the guy who figured it all out, maybe that guy was Vince Foster?

For a guy you all think is a moron he sure did pull off one huge operation.

Creation scientists are always asking us to keep an open mind, which then is filled with mush if given the chance.

By the way, I side with Bush being a moron.

Shane:

Timmy, it's shocking unfair, isn't it?

Lucretia Snapples:

The "Building 7" shibboleth is so unbelievably stupid. How many times do the Truthers have to be told? Building 7's basement held an enormous quantity of diesel fuel designed to be used for generators to power the city's emergency operations center, which was stupidly located in the Twin Towers. When the towers collapsed the fuel ignited and destroyed the building. It's not exactly rocket science Steven and there's no real mystery about it.

glen matlock:

Lucretia - I don't want to burn a strawman like the average progressive survives on, but I think the conspiracy that Mr. Jones puts forth here, as far as I can tell is that Osama's boys did the actual crashing and killing, it's just that the Bush admin knew about it before hand and let it happen.


The after the fact reasoning is a bit odd, the US has likely drawn up plans to invade every corner of the earth, and has a lobby somewhere advocating that those plans be used.


That Bush is a dope and knuckled under to the neo-cons and invaded Iraq just shows that he is an idiot, not that he is part of some master plan.

Diane:

touché Steven Jones- you put it so eloquently.

Brian Good:

Lucretia, NIST has acknowledged that that the fires in WTC7 were ordinary office fires, that the diesel fuel had nothing to do with it. Chris Sarns pointed out that a photo of the generator room louvers showed no smoke exiting the room. Thus either the louvers were closed, in which case any fires got no air, or the louvers were open and there was no fire.

glen, would you ascribe Condi Rice's lies under oath to stupidity or malice? She told the 9/11 Commission that the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" memo did not warn of new attacks. It did warn of new attacks.

See the video "Condi Lied Under Oath to the 9/11 Widows" here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcrgeuLb3dQ

There were warnings from 13 foreign countries, 3 FBI offices and the CIA. The UK, Germany, Italy, and Egypt specifically warned of planes as weapons.
Russia warned of suicide pilots. Jordan and Cayman Islands warned of attacks involving airlines.

Israel warned of 19 terrorists planning something big, and even provided the names of at least 4 alleged hijackers.

Morocco warned, France warned, Taliban warned, Argentina warned, the UAE warned, India warned.

Steven,

You are being a real journalist and hence are becoming increasingly like the "other" Steven Jones -- someone who was willing to make the sacrifice to put up with nonstop ad hominem attack to expose the facts that no one wants to hear. One would imagine that journalists wouldn't have to "sacrifice" just to do their job, but these days, the truth is a war zone. Thanks for taking over for a moment at the front-lines.

Two other "front-line" journalists had the guts to stand up for truth this Anniversary --

Jay Levin and Tom McKenzie of MetroActive, and also covered in the Santa Barbara Independent --

http://www.metroactive.com/metro/09.09.09/cover-0936.html

http://www.independent.com/news/2009/sep/17/elements-great-scientific-and-technical-dispute/

>>But the truth still matters, and real nobility lies in those who seek it out, no matter the personal cost.

Well put. A very well done little piece.

cyndirn:

911 was an inside job, there is too much evidence to ignore, too many inconsistencies in the official report. There is much science that points to alternative methods by demolition, also follow the money trails, Put options on AA and UAL, follow the money trail of wired transfer to ISI agent for lead hijacker. How about the gross failures of our multi-trillion defense sytem unable to intercept any of the jets that day? All this leads to inside job.

Myra99:

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
> S O M E O F T H E A B O V E N E W S
> ====================::::::::::::::::::::::
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::::::::
> ===================================:::::::
> Please post and forward as appropriate
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
> ==========================================
============================================

Great 911 Truth Action Photos & Videos:

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5823&start=0

====================================================================

LETS RAISE SOME PINK HELL!

Dear Some of The Above News

CODEPINK has never flagged in opposing the Afghanistan war and now public opinion is finally catching up. With 70 percent of Democrats opposing U.S. troops in Afghanistan, President Obama is making a fateful choice. If he escalates, the quagmire deepens and he loses more support among his base. If he refuses to send more troops he will be attacked by the Republicans for losing the war on terror.

CODEPINK and the peace movement are calling for an exit strategy that includes NATO/American troop withdrawal, all party talks, regional diplomacy, and continued aid for reconstruction, medical care, education and development, but your voice is not represented in Congress. But we have a proven ability to set off a storm in their districts that makes a difference. We affected the election outcomes in 2006 and 2008, and we must continue to raise hell until they listen and act.

Please read, sign and circulate this petition.

Double your numbers. Widen your support. Become the margin of difference. Bring down the Predators. Bring home the troops.

--Tom Hayden

Our friend Tom Hayden has been an important voice for peace for decades. CODEPINK and other activists around the world are joining with Tom now to use our collective voice and power to end war in Afghanistan. As this fantastic article in the New York Times states, the tides are turning in our favor - this fall, the antiwar movement is rallying in solidarity to challenge Obama's misguided policies on Afghanistan.

Join the call and sign here--we will deliver your message to Obama, Pelosi & Reid next week!

Tomorrow marks the 8th anniversary of the tragic events of 9/11 and it's
taken until now for the mainstream media to begin, finally, to expose some of the true costs of war. They did so recently by printing a photo of a dead US soldier against powerful pressure. Additionally, writers and
thinkers as politically diverse as George Will and Chuck Hagel have
published thoughtful pieces in the Washington Post on why we need to leave Afghanistan. But it's not enough yet and we can make the media do an even better job.

Stay tuned for our upcoming Activist Media Blitz. During the week of Sept 14-18, we'll push the story of the crucial importance of ending military engagement in Afghanistan and we will provide you with the tools you¹ll needto be engaged from your phone, computer, freeway over pass, the blogosphere, radio talk shows, letters to editors and more. Please join us to speak up and speak out in unison--lend your voices to the true story so it can be heard loud and clear above the din.

Let's take Tom's advice and raise hell (for peace)!

Dana, Farida, Gael, Gayle, Janet, Jodie, Medea, Nancy, Paris, Rae and Whitney

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/424/t/8834/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=2090

==========================================================================

New Entitlement Program

WE ARE ENTITLED TO MIRACLES

{Excerpts from the new biography, TRAITOR TO HIS CLASS The Privileged Life and Radical Presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, by H.W. Brands:}

TEA-BAGGER TACTICS THEN & NOW

As he [FDR] hit his stride he hammered at what had become the central, if unacknowledged, theme of the [1928] Republican presidential campaign. "I have just come from the South," he told an audience at Binghamton, which had experienced a rash of Klan activity. "I have seen circulars down there in the Southern states that any man or woman in this audience would be ashamed to have in his home. I have seen circulars that were so unfit for publication that the people who wrote and printed and paid for them ought not to be put in jail, but ought to be put on the first boat and sent away from the United States." Roosevelt tried to shame New York's bigots into better behavior by associating them with their more virulent southern cousins. He told a tale from Dixie:

"Just after I got down to Georgia, an old friend of mine in a small country town, a farmer, came in to see me, and said, 'Mr. Roosevelt, I am worried. A lot of my neighbors, all Democrats - we are all Democrats down here - say that they cannot vote for Governor Smith, and I don't know what the reason is. But there must be some good answer. Will you tell me so I can go back and talk to them? They tell me, these neighbors of mine, and they show me printed handbills saying that if [Catholic] Governor Smith becomes president of the United States, the Methodist and Baptist marriages over here among our neighbors will all be void and that their children will be illegitimate.'"

Roosevelt's audience laughed at the improbability of this assertion. "You may laugh," he continued, "But they were not laughing. They thought it was true, and they were honest, law-abiding citizens. They did not have the education, the contact, to know better. Oh, I could go on and tell you a thousand stories along that line."

==========

....Many of those who had known him before his inauguration and who watched him during the Hundred Days expressed amazement at how much larger he now seemed. Norman Davis and Raymond Fosdick had worked with Roosevelt in the Wilson administration; Davis told Fosdick, after a visit to the White House: "Ray, that fellow in there is not the fellow we used to know. There's been a miracle here." Fosdick agreed. "There HAD been a miracle, an intellectual and spiritual metamorphosis induced by adversity and triumph," he recounted later.

"Those lonely years of struggle when, as he told me once, his sole, determined purpose was to move his big toe, had done something to his character - something fine and strong which brought him courage and bold confidence, a depth of penetration and a new self-control. From now on he feared nothing and he faced the problems of his generation not only with level eyes but with sympathy and imagination."

Fosdick afterward recalled a formal dinner at the White House. Roosevelt shuffled down the long passage from the state dining room to the East Room, where the guests were gathered.

"He used a cane and hung heavily on the arm of an aide; and his walk was the slow, painful, contorted shuffle of paralysis. As he approached the door the Marine Band played 'Hail to the Chief,' and in a flash I realized with a lump in my throat that this apparently broken man was indeed the chief - with the capacity and magnetism of great leadership, and bearing on his face and in his handsome eyes the mark of confidence and power."

....[conservative cabinet member Raymond] Moley would change his views regarding Roosevelt's policies. But he never lost his admiration for the man's remarkable gifts, including the ability to treat the weightiest subjects with ease and laughter. "In short, he was like the fairy-story prince who didn't know how to shudder. Nor even the realization that he was playing nine-pins with the skulls and thighbones of economic orthodowy seemed to worry him."

==================================================================

CASH FOR GEEZERS

Want to Stimulate the Economy? Lower the Retirement Age to 55 Now!
by Thom Hartmann

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/08/24-7

=========================================================

PRINCE IMPLICATED IN MURDERS

Blackwater Founder Implicated in Murders

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090817/scahill

=========================================================

Please: CUT THE CRAP ON HEALTH CARE!!!

Deconstructing the Right Wing Lies on the Health Insurance Bill

http://pleasecutthecrap.typepad.com/main/2009/07/deconstructing-the-right-wing-lies-health-bill.html

==========================================================

CHILD SACRIFICE IN THE WEST

{{{ Excerpt from biblical scholar Bruce Chilton's new book ABRAHAM'S CURSE The Roots of Violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. (Child Sacrifice in the Legacies of the West) }}}

....But what if the sacrificial era has not gone by? Suppose the impulse to sacrifice, even to yield up the lives of children to gain supernatural favor, is still with us. If you consider, not what we say about ourselves, but what we do in relation to one another, you would observe that the twentieth century saw more children sacrificed to one cause or another than any previous century saw offered to its gods. The shift from religious belief to secular cause has not changed the fact that the increase of violence against innocents appears unrelenting.

With brutal precision, Wilfred Owen, writing during World War I in "The Parable of the Old Man and the Young," encapsulated the experience of the twentieth century. In his poem, even divine intervention cannot control Abraham's impulse to kill his child:

So Abram rose, and clave the wood, and went,
And took the fire with with him, and a knife.
And as they sojourned both of them together,
Isaac the first-born spake and said, My Father,
Behold the preparations, fire and iron,
But where the lamb, for this burnt-offering?
Then Abram bound the youth with belts and straps,
and builded parapets and trenches there,
And stretched forth the knife to slay his son.
When lo! an Angel called him out of heaven,
Saying, Lay not thy hand upon the lad,
Neither do anything to him, thy son.
Behold! Caught in a thicket by its horns,
A Ram. Offer the Ram of Pride instead.
But the old man would not so, but slew his son,
And half the seed of Europe, one by one.

....Abraham's curse remains our inheritance, because we live during a period of renewed sacrificial intensity, often without any awareness that violence since the First World War is unparalleled in its scale and in its choice of young victims. By untangling our actions from the atavistic impulse that kills children in the name of virtue, we can at last free Isaac from the cords that, had they remained tied, would have denied Abraham his progeny. Unless we do, unless Abraham's impulse and the means to transform that impulse are discovered, then Wilfred Owen will prove to be a prophet of this century as well as a principal poet of the last....

http://www.amazon.com/Abrahams-Curse-Violence-Judaism-Christianity/dp/0385520271

=================================================================


29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction

29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11

More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation.

For Some, the Doubts Began Early.

“Something is wrong with this picture,” thought Nathan Lomba, as he watched replays of the Twin Tower collapses on television on September 11, 2001. A licensed structural engineer trained in buildings’ responses to stress, Lomba saw more on the screen than you or I. He puzzled, “How did the structures collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?”

Lomba was hardly alone in his discomfort. Most structural engineers were surprised when the towers fell. They mainly kept their misgivings to themselves, though, as Scientific American and the Journal of Engineering Mechanics, BBC, the History Channel and government agencies such as FEMA and NIST offered varying and often imaginative theories to explain how fires brought the towers down.

Full article at:
http://www.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_2009-06-17.pdf

===============================================================

OBAMA COULD BE PROSECUTED!

Dear Some Of The Above News

I need your help to get this message out:

A recent headline in Bloomberg News said: "Obama Offers Key Posts to those who Bankrolled Campaign."

Under the 11th Circuit's ruling in "The Siegelman Case," President Obama and contributors who accept appointments could be indicted and convicted of bribery and extortion if President Obama knew at the time they made a contribution that the donor wanted the post to which the President later appointed them.

54 former Attorneys General, both Democrats and Republicans, said the 11th Circuit's ruling in the Siegelman case means "a prosecutor has the power to indict and convict any politician and any donor whenever a donation was made and the politician took action consistent with the donor's desire, while aware of said desire."

Your Congressional representatives need to know about this. Send them a message today!

Here is why it is important to Members of the House and Senate:

What's at stake is whether an elected official can be prosecuted for doing something for a contributor. Sound crazy? It is! The U.S. Supreme Court made it clear in McCormick v. U.S. that it takes an actual explicit quid pro quo agreement before the line between politics and crime is crossed. However, in my case, the court said that juries may infer an agreement from the minds and actions of the elected official and the contributor, the opposite of explicit.

The 54 former State Attorneys General told the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in the Siegelman case: "Such an interpretation puts at risk every politician who accepts a campaign contribution." "...criminalizing activities that fall short of an explicit quid pro quo agreement, can only lead to an impermissible chilling effect on the First Amendment right to contribute to political campaigns."

It is important not only to my freedom but also to every elected official, including the President Obama, to get this First Amendment issue clarified.

As I raise money to pay for my $150,000 appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court I am asking you to continue the fight in Congress.

Click here to send a message to your U.S. House and Senate Members, and urge them to investigate the prosecutorial misconduct in my case and remind them that 54 former state Attorneys General have said that the ruling in the Siegelman case "puts every politician at risk."

Thank you so much.

Sincerely,

Don Siegelman
Governor of Alabama 1999-2003

http://donsiegelman.org/index.html

===============================================================

Watch 911 Inside Job on Danish TV News (English Subtitles)

9/11 was an inside job. It's so obvious how all this has played out so Bush could put in The Patriot Act, Homeland Security, FEMA (including concentration camps), wire-tapping, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o

===========================================================

Press Release, AE911Truth.org: 640 Architects and Engineers Call for New 9/11 Investigation

Evidence of Explosives Found in Destruction of All 3 WTC High-Rises

AE911Truth to Display Evidence at National AIA Convention 4/30 — 5/2, Moscone Center
Press Conference/Speaking Engagement Saturday May 2 at 4 pm, Westin Market Street Hotel

http://www.ae911truth.org/info/55

=============================================================

Actor and activist Ed Asner has signed the Architects and Engineers for 911Truth (AE911Truth) online petition and sent a letter of support.

The text of the letter reads:

EDWARD ASNER

October 6, 2008

To Whom It May Concern:

I would like to thank Richard Gage, AIA and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth for presenting the scientific facts behind the unprecedented destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7. AE911Truth presents solid research that contradicts the official story of the building's destruction with the overwhelming evidence of explosive controlled demolition.

An accurate understanding of history is required to make good decisions in the future. Over and over again, history has shown that the first public perceptions of historical events are not always correct. I, along with millions of others, have serious questions about our country's recent history about 9/11.

I have signed the AE911Truth.org petition calling for an unbiased investigation of the "collapses" of these three high-rise buildings. I encourage everyone to do the same, and also become a Sustaining Member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Sincerely,

/s/

Edward Asner

View the full news item at http://www.AE911Truth.org

=======================================================

FROM:

An Efficient Way to Spread Truth That Everyone Can Do
By Colombo

Since our mainstream media continue to censor 9/11 truth, I
urge everyone to begin “mass emailing” 9/11 truth
messages now! It is not difficult to
disseminate thousands of emails per day. Here are some tips
to get you started:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321


======================================================

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
funnymoneyfunfunnymoneyfunfunnymoneyfunfunnymoneyfun
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

D E C E P T I O N D O L L A R S

click over to http://www.deceptiondollar.com

"Squandering money has never been so much fun":
http://www.911blogger.com/node/7840#new

======================================================

> Get Radio Active
> HELP STOMP OUT
> KLEPTOCRATS!
>
> U.S. Being Awakened from Media-induced Coma by AIR
> AMERICA RADIO: Find your station HERE:
> http://www.airamericaradio.com
> SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL PROPHETS!
> http://www.webspawner.com/users/newstudyshowsgodson
>
> =====================================================
>
SOME OF THE ABOVE NEWS
> ========= ==========
> ================================
> B E I N G W E T H E M E D I A
> ================================
> ===== SINCE 2003 =============
======= ===============
>======================================================

> To be removed from or to subscribe to this free
> Enewsletter list please email
> someoftheabovenews@yahoo.com with
> REMOVE or SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
> =====
> And if you don't like our news go make some of your
> own.
>
> Founder 2002: Johannieson & Friends
> Editor: Myra M. Jackson

A Lazy Sod:

Hey glen, I can see why you got kicked out of the Sex Pistols.
'God save the Queen and her fascist regime
It made you a moron',
remember ?

Rogue Leader:

Thank you, Dr. Jones, for stepping up to defend the truth. Your words, as always, are eloquent and rational.

A 2006 Zogby poll indicates that less than half of America believes the Bush-Cheney official story that a conspiracy of 19 Arab Muslim members of al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden are solely responsible for the attacks ( http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Less_than_half_of_Americans_satisfied_0523.html ).

We currently have 840+ architectural and engineering professionals who question the official story and maintain it does not conform to the basic laws of physics ( http://www.ae911truth.org ). The FBI's Michael J. Heimbach, Assistant Director, Counterterrorism Division, says: "Mr. Gage presents an interesting theory, backed by thorough research and analysis” ( http://www.ae911truth.org/info/45 ).

Additionally, we have numerous firefighters ( http://www.firefightersfor911truth.org ), pilots ( http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org ), military officials ( http://www.patriotsquestion911.com ), political leaders ( http://www.pl911truth.com ), veterans ( http://www.v911t.org ), journalists and other media professionals ( http://mediafor911truth.org ), religious leaders ( http://www.rl911truth.org ), medical professionals ( http://www.mp911truth.org ), lawyers ( http://www.l911t.com ) and scholars ( http://www.stj911.com ) who express doubt over the findings of the 9/11 Commission Report.

"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."
-Albert Einstein

Mr. Seacrudge:

Forget about 911, we need to look forward - to Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia. The Islamofascists will stop at nothing, as 911 proved. I don't believe terrorists are even human beings. They don't behave like humans, do they? But we've got to be tougher than they are. If that means torturing terrorist children to preserve our democratic way of life then we have to trust our government which is expert in such things.

To question 911 only serves the terrorists. That takes away our moral authority. That's why people like Van Jones have no place in government. The terrorists have created an uncertain and threatening world, and now those who luv freedom must stick together.

Paranoid minds can never accept simple truths. Satan has risen up from Hell! His name is Obama bin Sodom and he's threatening our Girl Scouts and apple pie!

America's survival comes first, constitutional idealism second.

Brian Good:

Thank you, Mr. Seacrudge, for a great satire of the cowardice that infects too many in our country! Hilarious!

Mike B:

Thank you Brian Good for realizing seacrudge was being sarcastic! I hear people say things like that so often that I actually thought it was a serious comment. How sad is THAT! Anyone that doesn't question 9/11 by now is just not paying attention!!!

Riis Oland:

Just a "head's up" for those reading these comments who may be new to the ever-growing revelations around 911.

Sheila Casey's article in the Rock Creek Free Press (June 28, 2009)
accurately stated:

"...most savvy 9/11 activists [are aware] that the truth movement has been infiltrated by...[individuals - both paid and unpaid - who have been] tasked with crippling activists in any way possible, and that many of the most strident arguments come, not from sincere researchers, but from disinformation agents intent on spreading confusion and discord. These [individuals]...can be expected to mount vigorous arguments against that truth, the better to keep the movement divided and to prevent a clear, cogent message ... from reaching the masses."

(Never doubt that they are among us, here, in these comments. However, thoughtful readers quickly learn to identify posts/comments of this type. They're shallow, argumentative, inauthentic, and formulaic. All are generated from the same "talking points".)

Post a comment

Verification (needed to reduce spam, not case-sensitive):

recentcomments.gif

JWM: Willie Brown and the Governator...smiling, holding hands, exchanging pla...

Rick Hauptman: As I stood up to boo Arnold I was shhhhsh'd by some near me. (These are...

mcas: Thanks for the video raqcoon-- and, it's pretty clear it was 'gay' ass i...

EarlRichards: Wife-beating is not a social problem, it is a crime....

Jag: Thanks....

PrisonMovement: JAG....there are many of us watching...and making our voices heard- thos...

PrisonMovement: There are many watching this mess...and have been for a LONG time. JAG i...

jag: Names documents and other VERY embarrassing things will be forthcoming b...