No smart meters in SF

|
(4)

TURN is urging customers to boycott the meters

EDITORIAL Smart meters are a dumb idea. That's what The Utility Reform Network says, noting that the high tech devices are expensive (California utilities, including Pacific Gas and Electric Co., will be charging consumers $5.4 billion to install the meters), don't save energy or money, and can lead to privacy risks. PG&E bills have soared unexpectedly in places where the meters have been installed in the past year, forcing an investigation by the California Public Utilities Commission, which concluded on Sept. 2 that the meters are okay, but PG&E's customer service isn't. Still, TURN and other experts say the report is inconclusive, and state Sen. Dean Florez (D-Shafter) wants legislative hearings before any more meters are installed.

San Francisco hasn't faced the smart meter problem yet since the utility hasn't been installing them here — but that will start soon enough, now that the CPUC (never known as a harsh critic of PG&E) has given the green light. TURN is urging customers to boycott the meters, so the San Francisco supervisors should tell PG&E that the city doesn't want this flawed technology.

Smart meters are supposed to make it easier to save energy. The idea is that the devices will not only track how much electricity a customer is using, but give that customer the ability to monitor usage at different points in the day and cut back during peak periods.

But to take advantage of the gadgets, a customer would have to buy a bunch of expensive gear on the side — communications devices, thermostats, computer chips for energy-intensive appliances, etc. PG&E isn't going to pay for that stuff.

Meanwhile, the "smart" part of the meter sends information about your energy usage through a wireless signal. Privacy advocates worry about that (as do people concerned with having yet another device in the house emitting low-frequency radiation).

And while PG&E denies that there are any problems with the accuracy of the meters, huge numbers of people in areas where they've been installed have reported huge — and otherwise inexplicable — hikes in their monthly bills.

So for most residents and small businesses, smart meters are just going to be a pain in the ass — a questionably accurate, potentially dangerous, and otherwise worthless device that PG&E is making money from by installing.

TURN has advice on its website (turn.org) for people who want to boycott the meters: to tell PG&E to leave the existing meters in place. If you put a sign on your meter saying you don't want it changed — and if you tell the person coming to replace it that you don't want a smart meter — you may stave off the new product for a while.

But San Francisco is in the process of creating a community choice aggregation (CCA) system that will put the city for the first time in the business of delivering retail electric power. That ought to give the city some authority over how local meters are going to operate — and at the very least, the city should tell PG&E to back off until CCA is in place and the city can do its own independent study.

The supervisors should ask City Attorney Dennis Herrera to investigate what authority the city has to block PG&E from installing smart meters, and to look at how the new CCA might avoid including the cost of the devices in the rates local customers pay for power. At the very least, the board can endorse the boycott and urge the CPUC to keep smart meters out of the city. Candidates for local office should oppose the smart meters. And if PG&E wants to force the issue, city officials just need to remind the utility that its local monopoly is illegal, that San Francisco has a federal mandate for public power, and that just three months ago, 68 percent of the city's voters said they wanted to preserve a public power option.

Comments

It's a shame you can't write an editorial with accurate information.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 07, 2010 @ 6:09 pm

You stated in your editorial that Smart Meters have not been installed in San Francisco. That is not true, unfortunately. I live in San Francisco and I have a Smart Meter and my electric bill has gone up significantly.

The rest of San Francisco needs to resist the installation of these meters.

Posted by Guest on Sep. 08, 2010 @ 1:29 pm

Wow, huge disaster in San Bruno where people are literally being killed by negligence and there's nothing at the bay guardian, and you don't even have your own work online of past abuses. I guess all you guys do is talk talk talk and yet actual reporting of news is lost. blogs are kicking your asses bigtime on this and you guys are wayyyy behind, talking about fucking Burning Man (aka a big contribution to global greenhouse gasses) and bullshit about some race for supervisor that no one gives a shit about. That's called a FAIL!!!

Posted by PeeGee Andee on Sep. 10, 2010 @ 5:38 pm

SAN FRANCISCANS: IF YOU HAVE IMMUNE SYSTEM PROBLEMS YOU MAY BE AT FAR GREATER RISK TO GET SICK QUICKLY FROM SMART METERS. THESE ARE BEING RAPIDLY INSTALLED (DEPLOYED) IN SAN FRANCISCO NOW, BEWARE. ORGANIZE QUICKLY NOT TO ALLOW THESE AND TO GET THEM OUTLAWED. MORATORIUM NEEDED QUICKLY, WITH REMOVAL FOR THOSE WITH HEALTH PROBLEMS WHO ALREADY HAVE THEM.
Smart meters are associated with SERIOUS health effects for many people, ESPECIALLY THOSE WITH IMMUNE DISORDERS AND CHRONIC ILLNESS. Beware! They are not only wireless but emit high bursts of radiation round the clock. Found to be up to 160 times stronger rf radiation of whole body than cell phones by one researcher. In CA and nationwide, there has been zero safety testing ahead of time for these new technologies and independent studies after-the-fact in CA yielded frightening results. Over 30 cities and 2 counties in California have expressed major concerns due to health effects and some have outlawed these installations. They are also a major potential danger for those with implants such as pacemakers and insulin pumps that can be interfered with by wireless. This is a worse program than the toxic FEMA trailer debacle, courtesy of the US Dept of Energy, who approved billions in Recovery Act money for your local utilities, ignoring the health complaints globally for smart meters and the warnings of scientists. www.smartmeterdangers.org
The utilities have hired consultants to pump out propaganda, to convince residents there are no risks. This is appalling to me, as i am one (with an immune disorder) who suffers from a smart meter that no one will take off my home, it is right by my headboard, pumping radiation through the walls - can no longer use that room or that part of the yard. VERY VERY SICK. I am disgusted by the utilities' approach - it is all about money, people don't seem to count anymore. If they did, a risky program that is shown to harm a portion of the population would never have been designed or used. Consultants to pump out baloney never would have been used, like the smart meter myth routine. BEWARE of SMART METERS. They can destroy your health and quality of life.

CA ASSEMBLY BILL AB 37 will allow opting out and a moratorium on installations. Please ask your legislator to support it and tell the CPUC you support it. Meeting on Thurs., CA Public Utilities Commission Bldg. 03/10/11 @ 9:00 AM
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/aboutus/2011MeetingDates.htm. Again, if you care about living a quality life in good health or a longer life even if chronically ill, with immune disorders or electro-sensitivity, pacemakers, or diabetic, attend and tell the CPUC you don't want smart meters. SPREAD THE WORD! www.smartmeterdangers.org

Posted by Guest on Mar. 05, 2011 @ 7:41 pm

Also from this author

  • Guardian endorsements

    Campos for Assembly, Yes on Props. B and 42, re-elect Gov. Jerry Brown — our recommendations for the June 2014 primary election

  • The future of Piers 30-32

  • Hold BART accountable for deaths