J'Accuse: An open letter from a UC-Davis professor

|
(17)

I

Madeline Perez, our correspondent on the scene at the University of California-Davis, reports that Nathan Brown, an untenured  assistant professor in the Department of English, has written an eloquent  open letter to Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi  demanding her  immediate resignation. She emailed his letter to the Guardian. Perez  says it has  further electrified the campus and given an emotional rationale to the Occupy Davis movement and unified the students in calling for Katehi's resignation. As a result of his letter, Brown has become an instant campus hero and given his department new distinction. He was interviewed Monday morning  on Amy Goodman's "Democracy Now" show on KPFA Pacifica radio  and then on Monday night  MSNBC cable television shows. 

Brown in his interviews emphasized the point in his letter that "the fact is, the administration of UC campuses systematically uses police brutality to terrorize students and faculty, to crush political dissent on our campuses and to suppress free speech and peaceful assembly. Many people know this.  Many more people are learning it very quickly."

Brown opens his letter by saying that he is a junior faculty member "who has taken an active role in supporting the student movement to defend public education on our campus and throughout the UC system. In a word, I am the sort of young faculty member, like many of my colleagues, this campus needs. I am an asset to the University of California at Davis. You are not."

He concludes: "I call  for your resignation because you are unfit to do your job. You are unfit to ensure the safety of students at UC Davis. In fact: you are the primary threat to the safety of students at UC Davis. As such, I call upon you to resign immediately."

Open Letter to Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi
Linda P.B. Katehi,

I am a junior faculty member at UC Davis. I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of English, and I teach in the Program in Critical Theory and in Science & Technology Studies. I have a strong record of research, teaching, and service. I am currently a Board Member of the Davis Faculty Association. I have also taken an active role in supporting the student movement to defend public education on our campus and throughout the UC system. In a word: I am the sort of young faculty member, like many of my colleagues, this campus needs. I am an asset to the University of California at Davis.

You are not.

I write to you and to my colleagues for three reasons:

1) to express my outrage at the police brutality which occurred against students engaged in peaceful protest on the UC Davis campus today

2) to hold you accountable for this police brutality

3) to demand your immediate resignation

Today you ordered police onto our campus to clear student protesters from the quad. These were protesters who participated in a rally speaking out against tuition increases and police brutality on UC campuses on Tuesday—a rally that I organized, and which was endorsed by the Davis Faculty Association. These students attended that rally in response to a call for solidarity from students and faculty who were bludgeoned with batons, hospitalized, and arrested at UC Berkeley last week. In the highest tradition of non-violent civil disobedience, those protesters had linked arms and held their ground in defense of tents they set up beside Sproul Hall. In a gesture of solidarity with those students and faculty, and in solidarity with the national Occupy movement, students at UC Davis set up tents on the main quad. When you ordered police outfitted with riot helmets, brandishing batons and teargas guns to remove their tents today, those students sat down on the ground in a circle and linked arms to protect them.

What happened next?

Without any provocation whatsoever, other than the bodies of these students sitting where they were on the ground, with their arms linked, police pepper-sprayed students. Students remained on the ground, now writhing in pain, with their arms linked.

What happened next?

Police used batons to try to push the students apart. Those they could separate, they arrested, kneeling on their bodies and pushing their heads into the ground. Those they could not separate, they pepper-sprayed directly in the face, holding these students as they did so. When students covered their eyes with their clothing, police forced open their mouths and pepper-sprayed down their throats. Several of these students were hospitalized. Others are seriously injured. One of them, forty-five minutes after being pepper-sprayed down his throat, was still coughing up blood.

This is what happened. You are responsible for it.

You are responsible for it because this is what happens when UC Chancellors order police onto our campuses to disperse peaceful protesters through the use of force: students get hurt. Faculty get hurt. One of the most inspiring things (inspiring for those of us who care about students who assert their rights to free speech and peaceful assembly) about the demonstration in Berkeley on November 9 is that UC Berkeley faculty stood together with students, their arms linked together. Associate Professor of English Celeste Langan was grabbed by her hair, thrown on the ground, and arrested. Associate Professor Geoffrey O’Brien was injured by baton blows. Professor Robert Hass, former Poet Laureate of the United States, National Book Award and Pulitzer Prize winner, was also struck with a baton. These faculty stood together with students in solidarity, and they too were beaten and arrested by the police. In writing this letter, I stand together with those faculty and with the students they supported.

One week after this happened at UC Berkeley, you ordered police to clear tents from the quad at UC Davis. When students responded in the same way—linking arms and holding their ground—police also responded in the same way: with violent force. The fact is: the administration of UC campuses systematically uses police brutality to terrorize students and faculty, to crush political dissent on our campuses, and to suppress free speech and peaceful assembly. Many people know this. Many more people are learning it very quickly.

You are responsible for the police violence directed against students on the UC Davis quad on November 18, 2011. As I said, I am writing to hold you responsible and to demand your immediate resignation on these grounds.

On Wednesday November 16, you issued a letter by email to the campus community. In this letter, you discussed a hate crime which occurred at UC Davis on Sunday November 13. In this letter, you express concern about the safety of our students. You write, “it is particularly disturbing that such an act of intolerance should occur at a time when the campus community is working to create a safe and inviting space for all our students.” You write, “while these are turbulent economic times, as a campus community, we must all be committed to a safe, welcoming environment that advances our efforts to diversity and excellence at UC Davis.”

I will leave it to my colleagues and every reader of this letter to decide what poses a greater threat to “a safe and inviting space for all our students” or “a safe, welcoming environment” at UC Davis: 1) Setting up tents on the quad in solidarity with faculty and students brutalized by police at UC Berkeley? or 2) Sending in riot police to disperse students with batons, pepper-spray, and tear-gas guns, while those students sit peacefully on the ground with their arms linked? Is this what you have in mind when you refer to creating “a safe and inviting space?” Is this what you have in mind when you express commitment to “a safe, welcoming environment?”

I am writing to tell you in no uncertain terms that there must be space for protest on our campus. There must be space for political dissent on our campus. There must be space for civil disobedience on our campus. There must be space for students to assert their right to decide on the form of their protest, their dissent, and their civil disobedience—including the simple act of setting up tents in solidarity with other students who have done so. There must be space for protest and dissent, especially, when the object of protest and dissent is police brutality itself. You may not order police to forcefully disperse student protesters peacefully protesting police brutality. You may not do so. It is not an option available to you as the Chancellor of a UC campus. That is why I am calling for your immediate resignation.

Your words express concern for the safety of our students. Your actions express no concern whatsoever for the safety of our students. I deduce from this discrepancy that you are not, in fact, concerned about the safety of our students. Your actions directly threaten the safety of our students. And I want you to know that this is clear. It is clear to anyone who reads your campus emails concerning our “Principles of Community” and who also takes the time to inform themselves about your actions. You should bear in mind that when you send emails to the UC Davis community, you address a body of faculty and students who are well trained to see through rhetoric that evinces care for students while implicitly threatening them. I see through your rhetoric very clearly. You also write to a campus community that knows how to speak truth to power. That is what I am doing.

I call for your resignation because you are unfit to do your job. You are unfit to ensure the safety of students at UC Davis. In fact: you are the primary threat to the safety of students at UC Davis. As such, I call upon you to resign immediately.

Sincerely,

Nathan Brown
Assistant Professor
Department of English
Program in Critical Theory
University of California at Davis

Comments

I support Prof Brown's call for Chancellor Katehi's immediate resignation and urge the Faculty Senate to support Brown by voting "no confidence" for this misguided UC Davis so called leader. She has clearly demonstrated that she is totally unfit to do her job and ensure the safety of Davis students.

I also call upon all of the Davis faculty to make sure that Prof Brown receives full protection for exercising his free speech in such a bold and daring way. Beware the administrators, trustees and politicians who may attempt to chill free speech by making Prof Brown an example.

Martin Zelnik , Ret Professor FIT/SUNY

Posted by Guest martin zelnik on Nov. 21, 2011 @ 8:47 pm

I fully support Prof Brown - free speech should be encouraged, not discouraged at a university. What makes us different from Syria or Egypt?
UC Davis school of Medicine

Posted by Guest on Nov. 21, 2011 @ 10:27 pm

Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi must resign immediately.
Police sadistic brutality on campus against peaceful protesters is unacceptable.
It's not Kent State anymore.
Larry W. Linnell, MD

Posted by Larry W. Linnell, MD on Nov. 22, 2011 @ 9:20 am

Few types of people understand how the world works less than English professors.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 22, 2011 @ 9:31 am

and get ideas about how the world operates by learning the works of myopic literary minded simpletons with no sense of politics and power, such as the writings of, say, William Shakespeare...

Posted by Eric Brooks on Nov. 22, 2011 @ 12:52 pm
Posted by Guest on Nov. 24, 2011 @ 5:35 pm

The world works? I might imagine what a world that doesn't work looks like.

Posted by marcos on Nov. 24, 2011 @ 5:54 pm

There were wrongs on both sides....

Had the students not erected tents, in effect "squatting" which is against the law, then the police might not have felt compelled to act. Those students trampled on the rights of all other UC students that use that public thoroughfare.

The police used excessive force. Had they just surrounded the arm-locked students and waited them out for nature to fill bladders and colons, the students would have broken ranks for a nature call, whereby the police then could have arrested them. At worst, the students would have soiled themselves or the police vans that transported them for booking.

Our society functions well under the constitution only when the citizens exhibit personal responsibility. Without that, we will degenerate to a society of self-entitlement.

S.R

Posted by Guest Concerned on Nov. 22, 2011 @ 11:07 am

Shouldn't you have labeled yourself 'Guest Concern Troll'?

Posted by anonymous on Nov. 22, 2011 @ 12:55 pm

Shouldn't you have labeled gutless anonymous?

Posted by Guest ND4Ever on Dec. 03, 2011 @ 6:11 pm

...? Anonymity is chosen for many reasons, In this case not cowardice, I assure you.

However since you yourself are also maintaining anonymity, does that somehow mean we are all gutlessly blogging at each other?

He who relieves himself in a glass bathroom...

Posted by anonymous on Dec. 03, 2011 @ 8:21 pm

Notwithstanding the possible merits of Assistant Professor Brown's letter I find it to be the kind of immature thinking he is supposed to be training his students to avoid. His rush to judge without all of the facts should earn him an "F". Garner the "facts", analyze, then reach a conclusion supported by those facts. One complaining about standards should operate with standards. The facts in this instance may support his conclusion; not because it was well reasoned, but because he was lucky. Everyone should take a deep breath and learn what happened first before asking for Chancellor Katehi's resignation.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 22, 2011 @ 12:55 pm

Are you actually asking us to believe that what we see in the utterly clear and extensive video of that event, is somehow not a factual basis for removing from office the person in charge of the school when it happened?

Give me a fucking break.

Posted by anonymous on Nov. 22, 2011 @ 1:11 pm

Let us never forget the Kent State massacre one of the most shameful moments in our history. Let us remember it so that it is never repeated.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 23, 2011 @ 9:41 pm

As a faculty member in the UC system (not at Davis), I was strongly inclined to sign Brown's petition when I heard about it. However, when I actually read his letter, I just could not do so because of how the letter is worded. He begins his letter by talking about *himself* rather than the pertinent issues. He writes, "I am the sort of young faculty member, like many of my colleagues, this campus needs. I am an asset to the University of California at Davis. You are not."

I am not certain that any campus needs faculty with such self-congratulatory views of themselves. Nevertheless, the other points his letter makes are valid.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 24, 2011 @ 4:50 pm

I am a UC Davis faculty member and while I most certainly support Assistant Professor Brown's right to freely speak his mind, I strongly disagree with his conclusions. His self important diatribe has all of the trappings of showmanship, albeit not very polished showmanship. At the end of the day, if you break the law - any law - you pay the price. If you don't like the law, then either vote for someone who will change the law or run for office on a platform to change these laws. Until state governments chose to spend tax dollars on education, campuses will have to cut costs and raise tuitions. The occupy UC Davis protesters had the right idea just the wrong location - they should be camped out on the Governor's doorstep.

Posted by UC Davis Faculty on Dec. 06, 2011 @ 9:40 pm

It is telling that Professor Brown had the courage to lay his own reputation and career on the line to call out the UC Davis Administration for its unacceptable attacks on the rights and the very bodies of its students; when you yourself have decided to be a complete coward and clandestinely snipe at Professor Brown from the sidelines without revealing your identity.

If you want your opinion to be respected as a 'Davis Faculty Member' you have the responsibility and moral imperative to reveal who you are, instead of hiding behind anonymity to avoid the accountability of defending your position by laying your own credibility on the line.

Posted by Eric Brooks on Dec. 06, 2011 @ 10:08 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.