What? Glenn Beck in for Strephanie Miller on Green 960

|
(20)

As we were driving to work this morning (1/4/2012), we were surprised and angered to find Glenn Beck, the rightwing  broadcaster who was too much for Fox News, replacing Stephanie Miller, the liberal, articulate, and clever talk show host on Green 960. How in the world could that be?  How in the world could the Clear Channel broadcast conglomerate put Beck on morning drive time on Green 960, which up to now had "proudly" proclaimed itself as the progressive radio station in progressive San Francisco? .How could it make this crucial political change at the very start of the presidential electon season?  Was it because Clear Channel is now owned by another conglomerate involving Mitt Romney? (In 2008, a Boston-based private equity firm purchased Clear Channel in a leveraged buyout, according to the Bradblog.)  Has Clear Channel/Romney no shame?

I have often tried in vain through the years to contact Clear Channel for explanation or comment on news stories. This time, I  am happy to turn the job over to the Bradblog below, operated by Brad Friedman, who runs an excellent independent blog specializing in investigative reporting, broadcast analysis, and election integrity issues.

Read what he has to say and get good and mad. Clear Channel is screwing the City and County of San Francisco yet again. Resist! B3
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8974


Comments

I thought he lived on the profits gained from his union-busting days at The Guardian, supplemented with the wages of fired employees like Sarah Phelan.

Posted by H. Monk-Brown CI on Jan. 04, 2012 @ 6:33 pm

Larry--Just stumbled across this item. Hope iit downloads OK and be sure to read all of the downlinks in red. I didn't know that
Bain had purchased Clear Channel several years ago. What with Romney leading the pack, their programming will be interesting to observe. Apparently an initial plan to replace a
liberal talk show station in San Francisco with a new station
featuring Glen Beck and other right wing talkers is interesting. However, it appears that the plan has been delayed. However,
the Bain situation is remindful of Fox broadcasting. Cheers
Bill

Posted by Guest Larry Miller on Jan. 04, 2012 @ 8:54 pm

Yeah losing Stephanie Miller for Glenn Beck means I won't be tuning into 960 am any more - her show was so friggin hilarious.

Be nice to see the Occupy movements occupying Congress for allowing big media to control the airwaves like they do. Radio in the bay area is useless except for KQED-FM (88.5 FM), KALW (91.7 FM) and KPFA (94.1 FM). The rest of it is a sad joke.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 04, 2012 @ 10:09 pm

Seriously, Bruce, why are you surprised? 960 was always corporate media. Sure, they decided to make some money by humoring Bay Area libs, so for a while they let a few liberal Democrats have their say. Sometimes it's entertaining to hear the perspective of the Democratic Party, but progressive it's not. I heard about these changes weeks ago, and I've always been chafed at the suggestion that this is a blow to "progressive" radio. A blow to "liberal" radio, probably. A blow to entertainment radio? Maybe. But a blow to progressive radio? Please.

You want progressive radio? Listen to KPFA 94.1

Posted by Greg on Jan. 04, 2012 @ 10:45 pm

They are shifting the name, format, et al. This started several months ago as I recall. It is now 960 KNEW. See http://www.960knew.com/main.html

Posted by Eric Brooks on Jan. 04, 2012 @ 11:58 pm

The format change at 960 is just another example of why corporately owned media monopolies in this country are the worst thing have ever been allowed to happen.

These media monopolies don't give a rats butt about the communities that they broadcast to, for them the frequencies provide the two things they covet more than anything in the world, money and the propaganda they use to provide excuses for why they should have most of it.

Those of you fortunate souls who still have locally owned and operated frequencies, don't ever take that for granted. If you have a business that needs advertising, help support your locally owned stations by advertising on them!

The last few independent stations in this country should be considered National Treasures, protected as historical landmarks from corporately sponsored interests.

Just Joe

Posted by Guest on Jan. 05, 2012 @ 7:01 am

We're fortunate enough to have a local station which DOESN'T depend on advertising. It's called KPFA.

You're right about the corporate control of course. But I would go further. What this illustrates is the complete bankruptcy of the argument that the "free market" will take care of a given good or service depending on the needs and wants of the community. Look at the bay area... mostly liberal listening audience. You'd think there's a huge market for liberal talk radio. And yet the "free market" has decided that the bay area should have several conservative stations and one liberal station which is now being turned into a conservative one. Why is that? It's because while corporations want money, there's also a class war going on. And the owners of the media are acting in solidarity with their class. They want to spread right-wing propaganda, even if they make a little less money in the immediate term.

"Independently-owned" media is better, but even small independent stations are operating in a system where they depend on corporate financing in the form of advertising. So they are loathe to air views that irritate their big advertisers.

KPFA's model, on the other hand, does not rely on (or even accept) advertsing at all. That way they preserve true independence. The only ones they're accountable to are their listening audience and the elected local station boards. But that of course means we need to support them financially from time to time, which I do. Because KPFA really is a treasure.

Posted by Greg on Jan. 05, 2012 @ 8:59 am

is irrelevant if they are the type of people who don't buy products and services, because then the station won't get the ad dollars to survive.

So maybe you should start spending more on capitalist products, and then you'll find that capitalism will reward you with more lame liberal media than you can throw a stick at.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 25, 2012 @ 3:25 pm

I agree. Thank God for KPFA. b3

Posted by bruce on Jan. 05, 2012 @ 3:49 pm

Please !!!! What can we do to raise hell about this ?
Let me know.

L. Chandler

Posted by L. Chandler on Jan. 05, 2012 @ 5:59 pm

No need to reinvent the wheel. Presente.org and Color of Change have already run successful campaigns to get Lou Dobbs and Glenn Beck off the air. If you're serious, then study their example.

In 2010, Color of Change launched a successful campaign to get Fox News to pull Glenn Beck off the air. They did it by targeting advertisers and helping them to connect the dots. The year before, Presente.org, which is like a MoveOn.org for Latinos, campaigned to get Lou Dobbs off the air, and they succeeded. They did it through a comination of on-line and on the ground organizing.

The final lesson is that you must come from a place of love, not hate. As Presente co-founder Roberto Lovato put it,
"During the campaign, people would tell me, 'Yo siento mucho ódio hacia Lou Dobbs' – 'I feel a lot of hatred for Lou Dobbs.' But I would say, 'We have to work not from a place of hatred but from a place where we love ourselves enough to say, 'Stop! Ya basta! No more!’” It’s like that moment when a woman who’s being abused steps up and says, 'I love myself enough to protect myself from abuse’—and her life changes. Our campaign had everything to do with love."

http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v26n1/basta_dobbs.html

Posted by Lisa on Feb. 25, 2012 @ 5:11 pm
Posted by Guest on Feb. 25, 2012 @ 5:58 pm

Glen Beck is a freaking idiot and so annoying to listen to. Stephanie was hilarious for the morning drive. At least we have Amstrong and Getty to turn to.

Posted by Guest on Jan. 05, 2012 @ 8:10 pm

I was shocked and dismayed to hear glenn becks' voice on my favorite radio station green 960. How many radio stations does the right wing need.. We are falling into a dangerous place of one sided news broadcasting. Other countries that had fallen into one sided propaganda in the past had suffered tremendously, (Germany under Hitler). A democracy needs many view points to flourish.

Posted by Guest 2 on Jan. 14, 2012 @ 7:54 am

How outrageous is this? The flaming, angry right winger in place of our fabulous Stephanie Miller? Whoever is in charge of programming must be out of their freakin' minds? WHO would listen to this idiot much less in the Bay Area? Do they think that we are going "to change" if they give us this moron to listen to? Come on. Someone better give their advertisers a heads up so when they lose profits they will know why. Disgusting. I now listen to her in the evening commute vs the morning commute. And besides Steph's time slot being moved, Tom Hartman and others have been programmed to ridiculous hours into the night. Poor Mike Malloy -I think his new time slot is like 1 a.m.? Get a grip new owners. We are NOT going away.
Obama 2012

Posted by Carol in Novato on Feb. 25, 2012 @ 2:47 pm

not so much. The other Bay Area counties will still mostly vote Democrat, but they'd probably rather stick pins in their eyes than elect a Green or similar.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 25, 2012 @ 3:27 pm

What are you talking about? There are a number of left-wing cities in the bay area, some more left than SF...and greener than Green.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 25, 2012 @ 4:22 pm

Several Marin cities have elected Greens. Berkeley has elected Greens to city council. Richmond elected and re-elected a Green mayor. Oakland elected a Green to State Assembly.

As to the larger issue... I still say tune into KPFA 94.1. You can never depend on corporations to provide you with news and commentary from a progressive perspective. Ironically, I get to listen to Stephanie Miller now in her new time slot, for the first time ever. Yeah, she's funny. I like her better than Malloy -a bit too over-the-top angry. but either way, it's still entertainment. For information, it's all about KPFA.

Posted by Greg on Feb. 25, 2012 @ 4:44 pm

more to the Bay Area than it's second, third and fifth largest cities. That's a million out of a total polulation of 4 to 5 million.

San Jose and south is moderate by any standard. Solano County is downright right-wing. Marin is all over the place but is so wealthy that they can afford to be green. Point being - it's a mixed bag.

And even in SF one in ten is republican - enough to sustain a radio station, surely?

Posted by Guest on Feb. 25, 2012 @ 5:14 pm

I see brownnose-claptrap is still making an arse out of himself and displaying his ignorance. Sad little wanker.

Posted by Patrick Monk. RN on Feb. 25, 2012 @ 4:06 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.