Solomon: The Orwellian warfare state of carnage and doublethink

|
(3)

By Norman Solomon

Norman Solomon is co-founder of RootsAction.org and founding director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.” He writes the Political Culture 2013 column.

After the bombings that killed and maimed so horribly at the Boston Marathon, our country’s politics and mass media are awash in heartfelt compassion -- and reflexive “doublethink,” which George Orwell described as willingness “to forget any fact that has become inconvenient.”

In sync with media outlets across the country, the New York Times put a chilling headline on Wednesday’s front page: “Boston Bombs Were Loaded to Maim, Officials Say.” The story reported that nails and ball bearings were stuffed into pressure cookers, “rigged to shoot sharp bits of shrapnel into anyone within reach of their blast.”

Much less crude and weighing in at 1,000 pounds, CBU-87/B warheads were in the category of “combined effects munitions” when put to use 14 years ago by a bomber named Uncle Sam. The U.S. media coverage was brief and fleeting.

One Friday, at noontime, U.S.-led NATO forces dropped cluster bombs on the city of Nis, in the vicinity of a vegetable market. “The bombs struck next to the hospital complex and near the market, bringing death and destruction, peppering the streets of Serbia’s third-largest city with shrapnel,” a dispatch in the San Francisco Chronicle reported on May 8, 1999.

And: “In a street leading from the market, dismembered bodies were strewn among carrots and other vegetables in pools of blood. A dead woman, her body covered with a sheet, was still clutching a shopping bag filled with carrots.”

Pointing out that cluster bombs “explode in the air and hurl shards of shrapnel over a wide radius,” BBC correspondent John Simpson wrote in the Sunday Telegraph: “Used against human beings, cluster bombs are some of the most savage weapons of modern warfare.”

Savage did not preclude usage. As a matter of fact, to Commander in Chief Bill Clinton and the prevailing military minds in Washington, savage was bound up in the positive attributes of cluster bombs. Each one could send up to 60,000 pieces of jagged steel shrapnel into what the weapon’s maker described as “soft targets.”

An unusually diligent reporter, Paul Watson of the Los Angeles Timesreported from Pristina, Yugoslavia: “During five weeks of airstrikes, witnesses here say, NATO warplanes have dropped cluster bombs that scatter smaller munitions over wide areas. In military jargon, the smaller munitions are bomblets. Dr. Rade Grbic, a surgeon and director of Pristina’s main hospital, sees proof every day that the almost benign term bomblet masks a tragic impact. Grbic, who saved the lives of two ethnic Albanian boys wounded while other boys played with a cluster bomb found Saturday, said he had never done so many amputations.”

The LA Times article quoted Dr. Grbic: “I have been an orthopedist for 15 years now, working in a crisis region where we often have injuries, but neither I nor my colleagues have ever seen such horrific wounds as those caused by cluster bombs.” He added: “They are wounds that lead to disabilities to a great extent. The limbs are so crushed that the only remaining option is amputation. It’s awful, awful.”

The newspaper account went on: “Pristina’s hospital alone has treated 300 to 400 people wounded by cluster bombs since NATO’s air war began March 24, Grbic said. Roughly half of those victims were civilians, he said. Because that number doesn’t include those killed by cluster bombs and doesn’t account for those wounded in other regions of Yugoslavia, the casualty toll probably is much higher, he said. ‘Most people are victims of the time-activated cluster bombs that explode some time after they fall,’ he said.”

Later, during invasions and initial periods of occupation, the U.S. military dropped cluster bombs in Afghanistan and fired cluster munitions in Iraq.

Today, the U.S. State Department remains opposed to outlawing those weapons, declaring on its official website: “Cluster munitions have demonstrated military utility. Their elimination from U.S. stockpiles would put the lives of its soldiers and those of its coalition partners at risk.”

The State Department position statement adds: “Moreover, cluster munitions can often result in much less collateral damage than unitary weapons, such as a larger bomb or larger artillery shell would cause, if used for the same mission.” Perhaps the bomber(s) who stuffed nails and ball bearings into pressure cookers for use in Boston had a similarly twisted rationale.

But don’t expect explorations of such matters from the USA’s daily papers or commercial networks -- or from the likes of NPR’s “Morning Edition” and “All Things Considered,” or the PBS “NewsHour.” When the subject is killing and maiming, such news outlets take as a given the presumptive moral high ground of the U.S. government.

In his novel 1984, Orwell wrote about the conditioned reflex of “stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought . . . and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction.”

The doublethink -- continually reinforced by mass media -- remains within an irony-free zone that would amount to mere self-satire if not so damaging to intellectual and moral coherence

Every news report about the children killed and injured at the finish line in Boston, every account of the horrific loss of limbs, makes me think of a little girl named Guljumma. She was seven years old when I met her at an Afghan refugee camp one day in the summer of 2009

At the time, I wrote: “Guljumma talked about what happened one morning last year when she was sleeping at home in southern Afghanistan's Helmand Valley. At about 5 a.m., bombs exploded. Some people in her family died. She lost an arm.

In the refugee camp on the outskirts of Kabul, where several hundred families were living in squalid conditions, the U.S. government was providing no help. The last time Guljumma and her father had meaningful contact with the U.S. government was when it bombed them.

War thrives on abstractions, but Guljumma was no abstraction. She was no more or less of an abstraction than the children whose lives have been forever wrecked by the bombing at the Boston finish line.

But the same U.S. news media that are conveying the preciousness of children so terribly harmed in Boston are scarcely interested in children like Guljumma.

I thought of her again when seeing news reports and a chilling photo on April 7, soon after 11 children in eastern Afghanistan were even more unlucky than she was. Those children died from a U.S./NATO air strike. For mainline American journalists, it wasn’t much of a story; for American officials, it was no big deal.

“Circus dogs jump when the trainer cracks his whip,” Orwell observed, “but the really well-trained dog is the one that turns his somersault when there is no whip.”

Norman Solomon is co-founder of RootsAction.org and founding director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.” He writes the Political Culture 2013 column.

Comments

Jason Grant Garza here ... yes this article again speaks to the INHUMANITY of MAN, the BANALITY of EVIL and as Orwell put " In his novel 1984, Orwell wrote about the conditioned reflex of “stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought . . . and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. The doublethink -- continually reinforced by mass media -- remains within an irony-free zone that would amount to mere self-satire if not so damaging to intellectual and moral coherence "

Shall I mention Guantanamo, Manning or even my own case with DPH, SFPD, OCC, MOD, the Sheriff's office. Yes, the LAW followed would be a great thing; however, ask the PRISONERS at Guantanamo, or Manning for his TORTURE or me for my TORTURE ... watch this video to see HOW DPH can BREAK the LAW with a FRAUDULENT Restraining Order http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cP3jCmJFRo

then watch how the DA's Office can tell me IT DOES NOT CARE ABOUT MY LEGAL RIGHTS .... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eN41g_veF8

or how the Sheriff can NOT check on the VALIDITY of a Restraining Order http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYC-syG0D7Y ... see all 6 parts to see HOW they try to HANDLE as OPPOSED to Duty and note that the Sheriff sends me back to DPH (his cup of poison 11/27) only for DPH to again BREAK the LAW on 12/19 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFd-KtS8Zss and WILL not schedule a FOLLOW UP meeting to explain not only his cup of poison but why NOT arrest for DPH ... instead thinking that the TRUTH will be covered and I will go away. Call and ask the Sheriff 554-7225 why no scheduling ... MIGHT IT EXPOSE THE TRUTH and INHUMANITY? Where is the Sheriff's Integrity if I can NOT followup on his INCORRECT and UNACCOUNTABLE advise ???

Watch the other youtube videos to see where I get with SFPD, OCC, MOD. DPH and naturally the Sheriff's office. What you will note is a pattern of ILLUSION, HARM and DAMAGES and LIP SERVICE to LAW and HUMANITY ... I mean what is the CONSEQUENCE to them?

Here is a good example ... civil standby ONLY to be lied to and not helped by the police ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYFPtQ0F_jU followed by http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IsDY5KOfxQ to show the nature of lies and the purpose ( intelligence fixing, incorrect and inadequate paperwork, no interview for the full facts, etc) and NOT only for OCC how about the Human Rights Commission in order to file access and accommodation denial complaints against city agencies ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTX-JUaeaZ4

Now ask yourself WHY WILL SFPD NOT take my police incident report for DPH's 12/19 lawbreaking activity ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHuQi_I8e4E ...

So the LIES,HARM and DAMAGE continue ... what is the CONSEQUENCE since NO ONE is willing to believe the TRUTH as the article above notes ... what PERSONAL integrity ... I still await the Sheriff's and a few others (see youtube videos) ... and KNOW that it will be a COLD DAY IN HELL before I get what is correct since there is NO PENALTY except a retirement and benefit package for those who "play the GAME."

You would think that with what I have I would be called in. offer a cup of tea and a chair to discuss and find remedy .. you would think; however ....

Posted by Jason Grant Garza on Apr. 18, 2013 @ 7:55 am

Every weekend i used to ppay a visit this web site, because
i want enjoyment, since this this site cconations truly pleasant funny material
too.

Posted by empower network on Nov. 20, 2013 @ 8:37 pm

terror on our mainland into your usual anti-America hatred.

Shame on you.

Posted by Guest on Apr. 23, 2013 @ 11:37 pm