A tough pill to swallow
How a drug-data publisher owned by media giant Hearst inflated the cost of medicine

The furor over escalating prescription drug prices has inspired dozens of state investigations and civil lawsuits in recent years across the United States, most of them targeting manufacturers.

But another factor in the increases quietly surfaced Oct. 6 in a Boston federal courthouse. Two major Bay Area companies were accused in court documents of inflating the cost of prescription drugs to the tune of an estimated $7 billion between 2001 and 2005.

The Wall Street Journal first reported in early October that a drug data publishing company based in San Bruno called First DataBank had reached a settlement with a group of unions in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania over how the company gathered and presented prices in the pharmaceutical catalog that it's maintained for years.

First DataBank is a subsidiary of the New York–based media empire Hearst Corp., owner of the San Francisco Chronicle, Esquire, and dozens of other publications across the country. Another company still being targeted by the plaintiffs is the San Francisco–based drug wholesaler McKesson Corp., which earned $88 billion in revenue last year and is ranked 16th among Fortune 500 companies.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T


First DataBank's price listings play an enormous role in determining what Americans pay for medications. When you receive a bottle of antibiotics to treat an infection, for instance, your private health insurer or state Medicaid program (known as Medi-Cal here) will refer to First DataBank's listed drug prices as a benchmark to determine what it'll pay the pharmacy as a reimbursement. That means if the benchmark goes up, so too can your insurance premiums and the cost to state governments.

The settlement, according to federal records, forces First DataBank to adjust the formula it uses to determine those prices. An economist hired by the plaintiffs testified that the savings in 2007 alone for consumers could amount to a staggering $4 billion. First DataBank has also agreed to cease publishing the prices in their drug guides within two years.

Physicians, hospitals, pharmacists, and all manner of other health care professionals pay First DataBank a subscription rate for access to a digital clearinghouse of information on drug dosages and allergies, among other things.

More importantly, First DataBank publishes what's known as an "average wholesale price" for more than 290,000 pharmaceuticals. There are three major drug wholesalers in the United States, including McKesson, that buy drugs directly from manufacturers and then mark up the price before selling the drugs to pharmacies. The average wholesale price — widely used around the country to determine what pharmacies will get as a reimbursement — is supposed to be a reasonable reflection of what the pharmacies pay the wholesalers for drugs.

First DataBank claimed to survey these wholesalers to come up with an average price that includes the markup, which it then lists in its drug-pricing database. But in recent years, the Journal reported, such surveys have been few and far between, and sometime around 2002, First DataBank inexplicably froze the markup at 25 percent, even though the prices pharmacies were actually paying fluctuated dramatically due to competition.

Citing testimony from one employee, the Journal notes that First DataBank began surveying only one company to come up with its average: McKesson. The cost to pharmacies still varied, ...

Read more... Page: 1 | 2 | 3

( 2 comments | Comment on this article )
rwills9083 on Thursday, October 19, 2006 at 12:31 AM
This article is the most accurate and well-written one on this issue I've read so far (and I've read dozens). Thanks for the fine reporting.

BW

PS: I'm currently an employee of First DataBank.
gwschulz on Friday, October 20, 2006 at 11:11 PM
Thank you very much for your response to the story. We worked hard to present in the simplest terms possible what is clearly a complex subject.

We're very aware that there is much more to the story for both First DataBank and McKesson. If you or anyone else familiar with how these two companies impact the pharmaceutical drug industry would like to speak with us, we'd certainly be interested for follow up stories.

This invitation is extended to everyone, including company executives who might like to comment more thoroughly beyond simply the prepared statements we were directed toward from Hearst, McKesson and the Boston plaintiffs.

Thank you again for reading the story. Check back regularly for updates. Healthcare will always be a front-and-center subject for millions of Americans.

G.W. Schulz

Reporter

San Francisco Bay Guardian

desk: 415-487-2545

fax: 415-437-3657

[Email]

Comment on: A tough pill to swallow

In order to comment on an article, you must Log In.

SFBG Classifieds