Endorsements: Local ballot measures
YES on Props A and E, NO on Prop H and more ...

Proposition A (transit reform)

YES

This omnibus measure would finally put San Francisco in a position to create the world-class transportation system that the city needs to handle a growing population and to address environmental problems ranging from climate change to air pollution. And in the short term it would help end the Muni meltdown by giving the system a much-needed infusion of cash, about $26 million per year, and more authority to manage its myriad problems.

The measure isn't perfect. It would give a tremendous amount of power to the unelected Metropolitan Transportation Authority, a semiautonomous agency created in 1999 to reform Muni. But we also understand the arguments of Sup. Aaron Peskin — who wrote the measure in collaboration with labor and other groups — that the MTA is free to make tough decisions that someone facing reelection might avoid. And the measure still would give the Board of Supervisors authority to block the MTA's budget, fare increases, and route changes with seven votes.

We're also a little worried about provisions that could place the Taxicab Commission under the MTA's purview and allow the agency to tinker with the medallion system and undermine Proposition K, the 1978 law that gives operating permits to working drivers, not corporations.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T


Peskin promised us, on tape, that he will ensure, with legislation if necessary, that no such thing happens, and we'll hold him to it.

Ultimately, the benefits of this measure outweigh our concerns. The fact that the labor movement has signed off on expanded management powers for the MTA shows how important this compromise is. The MTA would have the power to fully implement the impending recommendations in the city's Transit Improvement Project study and would be held accountable for improvements to Muni's on-time performance. New bonding authority under the measure would also give the MTA the ability to quickly pursue capital projects that would allow more people to comfortably use public transit.

The measure would also create an integrated transportation system combining everything from parking to cabs to bike lanes under one agency, which would then be mandated to find ways to roll back greenhouse gas emissions from transportation sources to 80 percent of 1990 levels by 2012. And to do that, the agency would get to keep all of the revenue generated by its new programs. As a side benefit — and another important reason to vote for Prop. A — approval of this measure would nullify the disastrous Proposition H on the same ballot.

San Francisco faces lots of tough choices if we're going to minimize climate change and maximize the free flow of people through our landlocked city. Measure A is an important start. Vote yes.

Proposition B (commission holdovers)

YES

Proposition B is a simple good-government measure that ends a practice then-mayor Willie Brown developed into a science — allowing commissioners to continue serving after their terms expire, turning them into at-will appointments and assuring their loyalty.

Members of some of the most powerful commissions in town serve set four-year terms. The idea is to give the members, many appointed by the mayor, some degree ...

Read more... Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7

( 7 comments | Comment on this article )
Staple on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 at 08:21 AM
On Prop A; exactly what does you mean when you say that you are going to "hold" Aaron Peskin to his statement on taxi medallions? How do you expect to do that. And do you realize that he is termed out of ofice next year???
marcB on Thursday, October 4, 2007 at 02:10 AM
Proposition A removes the reasonable ceiling that has been negotiated for MUNI salaries but fails to include measurable performance. Talk about a freebie. There is no explanation or reasonable rationale for this proposal doing anything to increase MUNI service. This is nothing more than a giveaway of a lot of money to what may be the least deserving service provider in San Francisco. And you know who gets to pay for this - you. Your MUNI bus that's always late, overcrowded,and filthy - that's not going to change with this lemon.
dustinxwhite on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 10:56 AM
There is no such thing as the "Metropolitan Transportation Authority" - MTA stands for "Municipal Transportation Agency." This paper routinely makes this mistake. Also, the "Transit Improvement Project" that this article refers to is actually called the TEP, or "Transit Effectiveness Project"
synergy on Monday, October 15, 2007 at 02:45 PM
SF should look forward to eliminating cars from the City. Make there be a huge cost for allocating space for parking. We're already drowning in cars. Fix mass transit before allowing one additional parking space be built.

WIFI is garbage: the citizens are NOT TOLD and are NOT ASKED about OPTICAL FIBER, which is WHAT YOU REALLY WANT. See [link] for a model for Community Fiber. Vote NO on J.
synergy on Monday, October 15, 2007 at 02:47 PM
There is the MTC, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, which deals with traffic in the 9-county Bay Area. They decide bridge tolls, for example, and coordinate the transit agencies. They are the policy agency for our area. Their main office is near Alice and 8th in Oakland in a building with BART and ABAG.
SenoraObscura on Wednesday, October 17, 2007 at 03:24 PM
I'm all for keeping things from privatization, but you're jumping to conclusions in saying that "optical fiber" is hands down better than wireless. Sure, it would make it easier for everyone to illegally download videos faster. But what if people just want to work in their laptops in our beautiful city parks? The internet is so anti-social already, so why confine it to residences only?
plumpy on Friday, October 19, 2007 at 12:53 AM
Senora: I imagine if everyone had some free fiber to their homes, open wifi access points would be plentiful.

Comment on: Endorsements: Local ballot measures

In order to comment on an article, you must Log In.

SFBG Classifieds