The price of the sweeps
Cracking down on the homeless costs taxpayers millions


Is this a crime?
Guardian photo by Neil Motteram

amanda@sfbg.com

The number of homeless individuals slapped with quality-of-life citations and the cost to the city of processing those citations reached new highs in the past 14 months, according to a study released by Religious Witness with Homeless People. San Francisco taxpayers have paid more than $2 million for more than 15,000 citations issued to people for crimes committed because they have no place to live.

"The quality-of-life citation ... begins an extremely expensive process," said Michael Bien, a lawyer on the steering committee of Religious Witness, an interfaith activist group started in 1993 by Sister Bernie Galvin.

The study, released at an Oct. 4 press conference, was based on documents provided by various city departments. The authors collated the costs from the initial ticket issued by a cop through the entire court process, including the new price of prosecution by the District Attorney's Office (see "The Crime of Being Homeless," 10/3/07).

A D V E R T I S E M E N T


The results are an update of a similar survey conducted last year (see "Homeless Disconnect," 9/5/06). Collectively, the two studies found that a total of 46,684 citations have been issued to homeless people, at a cost of more than $7.8 million, since Mayor Gavin Newsom took office.

But the mayor might not want you to know that. While Religious Witness was unveiling the study at a press conference in the South Light Court of City Hall, the mayor was hosting a simultaneous event about his heavily promoted Care Not Cash program, which provides homeless people with services and housing instead of the money they once received through the County Adult Assistance Program.

"What really bothers me," Sup. Ross Mirkarimi told the crowd gathered to hear Religious Witness, "is that we learn at the last minute that Mayor Newsom decides to have a press conference at the exact same time. To me, that couldn't be more base and exhibitive of bad form ... to try and upstage a press conference like this." He said the mayor's administration should be working with organizations like Religious Witness, not competing against them.

NEWSOM WON'T MEET

Galvin expressed dismay that the mayor chose not to attend, on top of scheduling a competing press conference on the issue of homelessness. "We've never had a press conference where we didn't have full press coverage," Galvin said.

"We've been trying to meet with Mayor Newsom since the day he took office," Bien said. "He hasn't even given us the dignity of a response."

Newsom's press secretary, Nathan Ballard, said he knew nothing about the event until he returned from his boss's fete at the Pierre Hotel, a single-room-occupancy hotel on Jones Street that houses some Care Not Cash recipients. He denied any intention to detract attention from Religious Witness's study. "I chose to do this a couple of weeks ago. There's no deep, dark conspiracy," Ballard said. The day was chosen to announce that Care Not Cash had "reached a significant milestone of housing over 2,000 formerly homeless individuals," ...

Read more... Page: 1 | 2 | 3

( 5 comments | Comment on this article )
marcB on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 01:46 AM
Amen Gavin. Homeless, Inc isn't going to like changing the status quo but getting the derelicts off the streets is long over due. I am hopeful that their are plans to rescue San Francisco from the diehard scumbags that do nothing but degrade the city. Imagine all of that fruitless money now going towards productive services. Homeless, Inc's (HI) contribution to the homeless effort has actually yielded net negative results but I expect HI will raise the bar in name calling in the hopes of preserving their (underperforming) jobs.
GavinSucks on Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 08:45 PM
Don't let my name Gavin Sucks.com fool you.

Newsom's plans for Homeless Outreach Teams with a new "Services or Citation" approach plus Community Courts in the Tenderloin are giving me hope for a better system.

The return on these programs will yield tourism, business and most importantly our Quality of Life (and that of the homeless) - PRICELESS!!!

Gavin Sucks.com, but a Old World Regressive like Chris Daly Blows.com.
WJPetersen on Friday, October 12, 2007 at 08:47 AM
I am so sick of the BS The Guardian spits out on the homeless situation. Newsom is attempting the best way he can to get homeless off the streets considering the idiot Supervisors he has to deal with (namely Chris Daly!). I live in SOMA (District 6) and am sick and tired of homeless people litering the sidewalks and causes families to move out.

On top of that, property taxes are so incredibly high one starts to wonder why would you pay so much to live in a ghetto??!! Get the homeless out any way necessary or you will lose both the tourist and the business/property owners who pay for all the city services to begin with!

Put them on a bus if you have to and get them out of San Francisco!!!
mikeytonews on Tuesday, October 16, 2007 at 01:54 PM
Perhaps Newsom ought to reconsider closing down 22 beds in the SFGH locked pshyc ward if he wants to get homeless off the streets.
macmac on Tuesday, October 16, 2007 at 04:39 PM
@marcB -- "getting the derelicts off the streets is long over due"

This comment makes it clear that you're kind of a d*ck. Or maybe that was made clear by the other comments you've made around here.

@GavinSucks -- "Services or Citation." A great plan, but where is a real investment in services? Perhaps your tourism industry buddies could pay their fair share?

@WJPetersen -- So sorry your property values aren't where you want them to be. I mean, heaven forbid a poor person with few real options sleep outside in your neighborhood.

And you may not like Chris Daly's politics, but you have to admit that he's playing the same game that Newsom plays. It's just that you don't like the people Daly defends, that is, the people in San Francisco that haven't yet been pushed out by Luxury Condos, Inc.

And the tourism industry and business owners aren't going to just pick up and leave en masse. SF is and always will be a very desirable place to live. Progressives want, at least in name, the same things you want -- safe and clean streets, good jobs, affordable housing, parks for our kids to play in -- but we don't take the tried-and-failed path of basically criminalizing poverty.

Comment on: The price of the sweeps

In order to comment on an article, you must Log In.

SFBG Classifieds