Defying the injunction
Targeted gang members say they'll risk jail to keep gathering in the Western Addition

news@sfbg.com

While City Attorney Dennis Herrera can claim victory in winning court approval for his controversial gang injunctions, at least one targeted group is openly defying the terms of the preliminary order, trying to make a statement that they should be given a chance to heal the wounds they helped create.

Alleged members of the Eddy Rock gang in the Western Addition, from the Yerba Buena Plaza East housing complex at Eddy and Buchanan streets, have continued to hold small film festivals and other gatherings in an attempt to show the public that despite being labeled violent criminals, they are making a positive contribution to the community.

As the San Francisco Police Department and City Attorney's Office say they are preparing to enforce the injunction, many of the named parties in the Western Addition say they will continue to congregate within the four-block "safety zone," an area where they are forbidden to loiter, be in the company of other gang members, or engage in other banned activities. In defying the injunction, they risk being jailed for up to five days.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T


"They're trying to force us out of our community, but we're [going to] fight it," Maurice Carter, a 32-year-old alleged gang member, told the Guardian.

The decision by targeted members to forge ahead with their community-building efforts is an attempt to sway city officials into easing the restrictions of the injunction, a prospect that seems unlikely at this stage.

"We've got the most influence of anybody," said Paris Moffet, whom the city attorney has identified as the leader of Eddy Rock, a label the 27-year-old disclaims. "But they don't think so. Instead of putting us down, if they want to stop the violence, why aren't they helping us?"

Superior Court Judge Peter Busch granted three injunctions sought by Herrera on Oct. 18 against two other gangs in the Western Addition and the Norteños in the Mission. The date for enforcing the injunction remains tentative, and city attorney spokesperson Matt Dorsey said, "Out of an abundance of caution, we will not begin to enforce the injunction against an enjoined gang member until after the proof of service for that individual has been filed with the court."

The city attorney is also holding sessions, with the help of the Gang Task Force, to properly train local police to enforce the measure. However, Lt. Ernie Ferrando of the task force said his unit can and likely will apply the restrictions to those who have already been served.

As of Nov. 26, 33 individuals have been served with injunctions, Dorsey said. Twenty people from the Western Addition — five from Chopper City, 10 from Eddy Rock, and five from the Knock Out Posse — have been given notice, along with 13 Norteños from the Mission.

Despite the measures being taken by police and the city attorney, which involve careful efforts to make sure only people named on the injunctions are prosecuted, critics of the approach say the injunctions may no longer be necessary in the Western Addition, where many of the targeted individuals seem to have made great strides over the past few months.

"I've been coming down here for four years, and this is the first summer that I haven't had to drive over caution tape," said Sheryl Davis, ...

Read more... Page: 1 | 2

( 5 comments | Comment on this article )
netik on Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 06:16 PM
test
harris9999 on Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 06:22 PM
test
freejp on Saturday, December 1, 2007 at 07:31 PM
"Paris Moffet, 29, identified as a leader of the Eddy Rock gang, was arrested on charges of possession of crack cocaine for sale, possession of ecstasy and child endangerment. He also is charged with additional gang allegations."

-from SFGate.com
renzomatic on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 at 12:52 PM
Most telling to me of the need to use the injunction can be seen by reviewing the attached articles. On 11/28, the Bay Guardian quoted one Paris Moffett ([link]) who essentially complained about the injuntion. On 11/29, Paris was arrested at his home where a 1/2 pound of crack cocaine was found. ([link]) Obviously, the injunction is unwanted by the potential victims as it would dramatically impact their "business" activities. I don't need any more evidence that the injunctions are a good thing.

Gang members doing "good works for their neighborhood" is akin to Chevron donating money to solar or conservation groups or doing TV PSA's. They are simply providing a public cover to their otherwise nefarious business practices.
renzomatic on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 at 12:53 PM
Most telling to me of the need to use the injunction can be seen by reviewing the attached articles. On 11/28, the Bay Guardian quoted one Paris Moffett ([link]) who essentially complained about the injuntion. On 11/29, Paris was arrested at his home where a 1/2 pound of crack cocaine was found. ([link]) Obviously, the injunction is unwanted by the potential victims as it would dramatically impact their "business" activities. I don't need any more evidence that the injunctions are a good thing.

Gang members doing "good works for their neighborhood" is akin to Chevron donating money to solar or conservation groups or doing TV PSA's. They are simply providing a public cover to their otherwise nefarious business practices.

Comment on: Defying the injunction

In order to comment on an article, you must Log In.

SFBG Classifieds