The Ron Paul phenomenon
The Ron Paul phenomenon: How a Republican presidential campaign caught fire in San Francisco

news@sfbg.com

San Franciscans rarely get excited about Republican presidential candidates, and it's rarer still to see GOP campaign signs in Mission District windows, beat-up old cars, or crowds of enthusiastic supporters flooding the city's streets. But that's what Ron Paul has been inspiring.

"I would give my entire net worth to see Ron Paul elected president," a man holding a "Ron Paul '08" sign on the corner of Powell and Geary on Dec. 16 said. "I've never contributed to a candidate's campaign in my life, but in the past months I've given about $600 or $700."

Paul's frank assessment of the United States as an overreaching empire got his campaign rolling, and it has gathered serious momentum in the past couple of months, as evidenced by an increasing online presence and record-breaking fundraising for November and December. Paul's essentially libertarian platform is attracting support from a surprisingly diverse range of people, from lifelong members of the National Rifle Association to medical marijuana activists to disenchanted college students.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T


Perhaps even more surprising, this Republican from Texas is generating significant support among Bay Area voters. "Ron Paul" signs are now visible at antiwar protests, on lawns, and in apartment windows. People who have never been politically active or have never felt excited by a candidate before are spending their free time tabling at weekend farmers markets and walking precincts after work in support of the candidate.

A recent recruit of the San Francisco Ron Paul meetup.com group, which is attracting new members daily, captured the fervor of Paul supporters with this posting: "I can't believe my new hero is a politician. Never in my life have I encountered any political leader who actually represented me. This country needs Ron Paul desperately."

Despite their demographic diversity, one unifying theme among all Paul supporters is their absolute belief in their candidate's integrity. He is perceived as a man who says what he thinks and takes action according to what he says; he is seen as a rare breed among politicians, especially those who, like Paul, have served several terms in Washington DC. "My gut tells me Ron Paul is different," said John Harvan, one of about 60 radiant Paul supporters gathered amid Union Square holiday shoppers Dec. 16.

Bay Area supporters — organized through online meet-up groups — were congregated on the chilly Sunday in solidarity with a national Paul fundraising push, or what the campaign dubbed "a moneybomb." Staged to coincide with the anniversary of the 1773 Boston Tea Party, the Ron Paul Tea Party was, as one Web site put it, "a symbolic dumping of these tyrannical systems that thwart our true destiny of Freedom & Liberty!"

The Dec. 16 fundraising push was an unquestionable success, raising more than $6 million in a 24-hour period. Paul's campaign had already received national attention when it received $4.2 million in donations Nov. 5, which precipitated his much-needed boost in the polls. But $6 million broke the record for funds raised in one day, a record previously held by the John Kerry campaign for raising $5.7 million in 2004.

Most of the donations to the Paul campaign are small contributions ...

Read more... Page: 1 | 2 | 3

( 29 comments | Comment on this article )
dmc4rp on Thursday, December 27, 2007 at 03:45 PM
The Ron Paul Revolution is real because ordinary Americans are sick and tired of the false-democracy laid out by the two-party system that only ensures more government, more taxes, more wars, more hatred of America, etc.

See why so many people support Dr. Ron Paul:

[link]
kitmaira on Thursday, December 27, 2007 at 05:51 PM
Thank you for this excellent article on Dr. Ron Paul!
mketcher on Thursday, December 27, 2007 at 06:30 PM
Ron Paul is the only candidate that can appeal to both liberals and conservatives --he is a candidate that unites, rather than divides. Unlike any other candidate, Democratic or Republican, he brings authenticity, honesty, and integrity to the presidential election.

See this YouTube music video, which is a dead-on satire on the president, the mindless MSM, and the war on terror. It's from the new zombie musical feature film, "Song of the Dead," and features horror movie veteran, Reggie Bannister (Wishmaster, Phantasm, Bubba Ho-tep) as the president of the U.S. responding to a "zombie terrorist" attack. The filmmaker, Chip Gubera, is donating a share of his DVD sales of this anti-war satire to the Ron Paul campaign. Go to:

[link]

mketcher on Thursday, December 27, 2007 at 06:36 PM
Ron Paul is the only candidate who can unites the country, rather than divides it. He can bring liberal and conservative and Republican and Democrat together. His focus is on the U.S. Constitution, and that's something that all Americans hold dear. Ron Paul is gaining ground, because he's this only candidate that brings authenticity, honesty, and integrity to the presidential race.

See this YouTube music video, which is a dead-on satire on the president, the mindless MSM, and the war on terror. It's from the new zombie musical feature film, "Song of the Dead," and features horror movie veteran, Reggie Bannister (Wishmaster, Phantasm, Bubba Ho-tep) as the president of the U.S. responding to a "zombie terrorist" attack. The filmmaker, Chip Gubera, is donating a share of his DVD sales of this anti-war satire to the Ron Paul campaign. Just go to YouTube and search on Chip Gubera to see the video.

RPFP on Thursday, December 27, 2007 at 07:11 PM
RE: "'His social views against immigration, abortion, affirmative action, and women make me nervous,' Bankhead told the Guardian."

I find these kinds of comments a bit odd, since Ron Paul has made it perfectly clear that his only social view on these issues is that the States should decide for themselves how these issues are to be handled.

I think a lot of people have finally come to the realization that the country needs to be flexible enough to encompass a wide range of social needs and expectations. Perhaps the people in Alabama would make abortion illegal, but Californians might choose to legalize it. In that case, we Americans would then have choices--we could move to a State that mostly closely meets our needs and expectations.

So even Ron Paul would say that his own personal views on these subjects doesn't matter. All that matters is that we, as Americans, make decisions that are right for us.

That is what liberty is all about.

paulhogarth on Thursday, December 27, 2007 at 09:09 PM
Do these idiots know where Ron Paul stands on any issue OTHER than the War in Iraq?? The guy is a right-wing lunatic, who holds fringe views that are racist.

Democrats have a historic opportunity to dethrone the Clinton dynasty by supporting Barack Obama. I saw how deluded lefties got excited about John McCain back in 2000, which killed Bill Bradley's insurgent campaign on the Dem side.

Do these Ron Paul supporters have any idea what they're doing????
NH4RonPaul on Thursday, December 27, 2007 at 09:31 PM
Oh so now we're idiots eh? yes this idiot knows where he stands on everything and he is correct.

And unless you have proof that these views are 'fringe' and 'racist' I suggest you be careful.

Ron Paul is the sweetest most honest man, a statesman, and authority on foreign an monetary policies. He is about as old fashioned as apple pie.. I don't know what views are 'fringe', or where you might think he is a racist.

Everyone knows the only racist in this race is Obama. His church is black supremacist/separatists.

Although Hillary panders to and makes money from LaRAZA the 'new KKK' and most well organized racist group in the USA.
poelmanc on Thursday, December 27, 2007 at 09:42 PM
Yes paulhogarth, this "right-wing lunatic", as you call him, favors drug legalization. This "right-wing lunatic" says who you live with or even marry should be between you and your church or your own conscience, and should be none of the government's business. This "right-wing lunatic" speaks out vehemently against the Patriot Act and other intrusions on our liberties. This "right-wing lunatic" would protect the social programs that the government has made people dependent upon. Hmm, his square peg doesn't quite fit into that nice little "right-wing lunatic" hole you've created, trying learning a bit more about him and I think you'll be impressed.

bgedit on Thursday, December 27, 2007 at 10:59 PM
Ron Paul also opposes most taxes and business regulations. That's where the rubber hits the road, folks: If we continue to let the gap between the rich and the poor increase in this country, we're in deep deep social trouble, and I'm sorry, but everything in the history of the past century says that government MUST play a role in leveling that gap and that tax policy -- high taxes on high incomes -- is the most effective tool.

aminorex on Friday, December 28, 2007 at 08:07 AM
The neocons would love for you to think that Ron Paul is a racist. The NYT was recently caught lying about this: [link]

The fascist spin-machine is in overdrive trying to contain the revolution, because they fear the power of the people.

pingish on Friday, December 28, 2007 at 10:37 AM
bgedit - A Ron Paul presidency is economically bad for only one group of people: the lazy.

By eliminating taxes, business and corporate interests would no longer buddy up with politicians -- who controls the taxes -- to make away with their loot (think Halliburton), and would have to compete in the market for our hard-earned dollars (think more like Apple).

By eliminating regulations set in place by government -- who colludes with big business, small operators can now compete in what is a corporately dominated world.

Under a Ron Paul presidency, the poor would eat like kings.
RonPaulPatriot on Friday, December 28, 2007 at 11:22 AM
So ... paulhogarth

Thursday, December 27, 2007 at 09:09 PM

So ... paulhogarth You said

"Do these idiots know where Ron Paul stands on any issue OTHER than the War in Iraq?? The guy is a right-wing lunatic, who holds fringe views that are racist."

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX



So paulhogarth you feel that following the constitution is a "Fringe" "lunatic" idea?

Well I'm one of those millions of "Lunatics" out here that will be voting Liberty instead of Politician. I will be voting for Ron Paul!!

m_montagne on Friday, December 28, 2007 at 11:50 AM
PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy adamantly supports Ron Paul for president. For the first time in some 100 years, the American people have a chance to overturn the imposed, unconstitutional, so called Federal Reserve System — a system which can only multiply debt to the most adverse consequences.

Today, as a consequence of this long standing abuse of power, there is a powerful political movement afoot. Finally, we have before us the rise and mounting recognition of yet another great leader.

(Please see our site for qualified solution of the present “economic” issue: [link])

mike montagne — PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy
hammond on Friday, December 28, 2007 at 02:22 PM
Remember or know that in the 1950's your dollar would buy 30% more than what you could today. 190's prices could really become reality if we stop printing the dollar, stopped going crazy with low intrest rates - not needed loans, excess consumerism and a excutive branch who only exists for their close buddies. We have to take responsibility for ourselves and stop allowing the feds to bailout fools. Lets protect the USA HERE and not some 3rd world tolet.

RON PAUL for a free America!
mike6ft9in on Friday, December 28, 2007 at 02:36 PM
I grew up in Berkeley in the 60's, and now live in St. Petersburg, Florida. Besides a life long love of the City, I carry another seed from that upbringing: an open mind. You may see the slogan Ron Paul Revolution, with the word "LOVE" spelled backwards in red. We love our country, us Ron Paul supporters. We love our Constitution, our candidate, and our Freedom. We are diverse, in age, race, and political party. Liberal and Conservative are divisive words that keep people apart. In Ron Paul, these words soften to a blur. Who cares what you call yourself? Ron Paul would be just as compassionate as any Liberal, just as effective in defense of our contry as any Conservative. He is the Champion of the Constitution. He brings us together. Michael Henderson St. Pete, Florida
hammond on Friday, December 28, 2007 at 02:41 PM
Remember or know that in the 1950's your dollar would buy 30% more than what you could today. 190's prices could really become reality if we stop printing the dollar, stopped going crazy with low intrest rates - not needed loans, excess consumerism and a excutive branch who only exists for their close buddies. We have to take responsibility for ourselves and stop allowing the feds to bailout fools. Lets protect the USA HERE and not some 3rd world tolet.

RON PAUL for a free America!
cdwitmer on Friday, December 28, 2007 at 06:23 PM
Why should you support Ron Paul despite disagreeing with his position on abortion? The reason is simple: current demographic trends and cultural phenomena mean that legalized abortion's days are numbered regardless of who becomes president. The only way abortion could remain legal permanently would be if an abortion advocate became president and then built on the precedents of Bush-Cheney to outlaw homeschooling and to impose Chinese-style limits on family size. Remember: CONSERVATIVES DON'T HAVE ABORTIONS. THEY HAVE LOTS OF CHILDREN, AND THOSE CHILDREN GROW UP TO VOTE. Thus the country becomes more conservative over time. This is a demographic trend CAUSED BY LEGAL ABORTION that simply cannot be altered. And alternatives to government schooling are only accelerating the trend, because those alternatives tend to present children with an overwhelmingly conservative perspective on social issues. Since this demographic trend simply cannot be fought, you should go with the best candidate under the circumstances. Do you want the White House filled by Mike Huckabee? If Ron Paul ISN'T the wave of the future, then Mike Huckabee is . . . those are your choices, folks. (I'm not talking just about 2008 but about several decades to come.) I think Ron Paul is the obvious best choice! At the national level, the era of progressivism is rapidly coming to an end.
Solarion on Friday, December 28, 2007 at 07:25 PM
I think "Hammond" forgot to add a zero when he claimed that the 1950s dollar bought only 30% more. Gasoline was 25 cents a gallon, as I recall in the 1950s and early 60s. My first job as a high school student paid $1.25/hour, but that money bought a lot more than it does today. The best documented figure I've seen - and the one Ron Paul uses is that the 1913 dollar has shrunk to the value of 4 cents today.

This inflation has hurt the poor and benefitted certain of the very rich, such as the financial industry and the military-industrial-complex, who get the freshly printed Fed fiat dollars first.

Ron Paul is the only candidate who will cut to the root of our political problems. And where is there another viable peace candidate, even if you don't agree with everything RP says?
satyabodhi on Friday, December 28, 2007 at 08:50 PM
I support Ron Paul because he opposes all undeclared wars and because he will bring the troops home from Bosnia, Japan, Germany, England and Korea. I do disagree with him about abortion and imagration. I recognise his position as principled and consistent. I trust him. So, even though I don't always agree with him, I see that he supports my strong desire for peace and freedom.
GregoryRichards on Saturday, December 29, 2007 at 03:33 AM
Ron Paul is the Rock Star celebrity of American politicians! This, do much in part to the media's obvious bias against him.

American's love underdogs, and this will weigh heavily in his favor come election day.

Additionally, this truly authentic, intellectual giant stands out amongst his status quo peers as a humble and most honest man, maybe in all of politics today!

Expect the unexpected from this fine Patriot, I certainly do!
ellis on Saturday, December 29, 2007 at 04:09 AM
I am 66. The last time I liked a presidential candidate was George McGovern in 1972. Last week I changed my party affiliation so that I could vote in the Republican primary.

I am discouraged with the corruption and socialism in America. One day, I saw a billboard that said Ron Paul wants to abolish the IRS. I checked it on the Internet and found his Web site. Then I read about his beliefs --- and from that point, I started writing to my friends --- telling them that here is finally a politician who I can admire.

In the last election, I voted for John Kerry. I did that primarily because of the War in Irag and also because of the Republican invasion of personal privacy.

I know nothing of Ron Paul's chances to win the primaries. But, if he only could win --- then I think I actually be able to be proud of America again.

By the way, I have never contributed to a presidential campaign before --- and I did this time.
Jeanette on Saturday, December 29, 2007 at 06:10 AM
It might be of interest to you to learn that CA has donated more money to the Ron Paul campaign than any state.

Here in Northern CA Ron Paul stands for Federal government leaving the CA alone on Cannabis crops medicinal and industrial.

Act Locally, Think Globally: Vote Ron Paul
MrCobaltBlue on Saturday, December 29, 2007 at 06:20 AM
Great article! Although my only issue is the the guy saying "Paul is against immigration." No he's not, he's against illegal immigration, the normal kind is fine.
ItDoesntMatter on Saturday, December 29, 2007 at 06:39 AM
Ron Paul is nuts. Unlike some previous posters, I'll take the time to prove it.

The important thing to understand about libertarian policy proposals is that they sound wonderful, but if you carefully investigate their likely outcomes, it becomes clear that they would be terrible, awful things to do.

Point one: Ron Paul wants to abolish the income tax, relying only on excise and sales taxes. You may read about it in his "End the Income Tax" essay on his website. It sounds great, I know I'd love the money. But to cover good things that we can all agree the Federal government should continue spending money on, those sales and/or excise taxes, which are both regressive taxes, would have to be jacked up. Do you know what would happen if everyone had to pay a 20% sales tax? The working poor especially do not have an extra 20% in their budget to cover that sort of increase in costs for food, clothing, housing, and health care. Because the income tax is a progressive tax with a lessened burden on those near the poverty line, Ron Paul's proposal would be increasing taxes on the poor enormously, far more than they can cope with. Abolishing the income tax would be a horrible thing to do to our fellow man.

What sorts of things can even a libertarian agree the Federal government should spent money on? Border security, the military (even a much smaller military composed of reservists is still pricey in the modern day, thanks to things like fighter jets, tanks, and so on...), policing (there are crimes the States just don't have the resources to handle), education (nearly every institution of higher education in the country is reliant on Federal funds, and that's a good thing), the justice system, social security (because it's wrong to let elderly people starve), health care (because it's also wrong to let people die simply for being poor), and many others. One way or another, those things need to be paid for. If the Federal government abdicates these to the States, then each State will either have to raise taxes anyway, or else the aforementioned Bad Things happen, which would be terrible for the country as a whole.

EileenMac on Saturday, December 29, 2007 at 09:24 AM
The concern about Ron Paul's social views on immigration, abortion, affirmative action and "women" could be assuaged if Americans truly understood the US Constitution and its ability to protect ALL people if interpreted correctly.

The above issues, and many others, are only issues because of the success of those on the political extremes of left and right, and those with agendas which pervert the principles on which this nation was founded.

These are rightly called "wedge" issues because the real intent of those who are on the extremes of these issues is to drive a wedge between We the People and our God (as you understand him/her/it) given rights of liberty and freedom. And the best way to get us to give up these rights is to divide Americans from each other.

Ron Paul's message is NOT a message on what to do about America's issues, but on HOW government of the people, by the people and for the people is to work...as determined by our Constitution.

The intent of the Constitution is clearly stated in the Preamble, and, if we would return to the Rule of Law, and the premise that We the People are the rulers, not the government, or the corporations, or the special interest groups, solutions to all these problems could be found and acted upon.

Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate offering a logical and consistent and practical solution to the mess this country is in...and that is to return to the principles of the Constitution.
pingish on Saturday, December 29, 2007 at 11:13 AM
@ItDoesntMatter:

Dr. Paul is for abolishing the income tax and replacing it with nothing. "To cover good things that we can all agree the Federal government should continue spending money on," is exactly the point... we cannot all agree on the issues, and the ones where the Federal spending is Constitutional (national defense, judicial system, etc...) are so few that you don't need the income tax to fund them.

The poor have the most to lose with taxes and excess government spending. All that loot goes to Washington upon which special interest (
anelk on Monday, December 31, 2007 at 07:19 PM
Wake up folks! A Ron Paul presidency would be just as damaging to everyday people as the George Bush Presidency, albeit in different ways. The bulk of his ideas will take us backward, not forward. Consider just a few examples:

1. Gay Rights

Paul was against the landmark 2003 Lawrence V. Texas Supreme Court Decision that finally struck down anti-sodomy laws across the country. See this article: [link] While he doesn't appear to like such laws, he says: "There are...states’ rights ... plainly affirmed in the Ninth and Tenth amendments. ...the State of Texas has the right to decide for itself how to regulate social matters like sex, using its own local standards." Using "states rights" to justify repression of a minority group has happened before -- in the Confederacy.

2. Immigration

And speaking of the 1860's, Paul also wants to do away with jus soli or birthright citizenship. The concept that anyone born in the US is automatically a citizen wasn't extended to former slaves until the 14th amendment, passed in the aftermath of the Civil War. Why take us back 140 years by taking this important right away? Well, per his website it sounds like Paul also wants to deprive undocumented people of medical care and kick their kids of out school. That's just inhumane.

Look folks, it's lovely that he wants to end the war, NAFTA, patriot act, etc, and those have got to go -- but he's not the right vehicle for that. The rest of his ideas will cause serious damage here and abroad.

pingish on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 12:17 AM
@anelk:

get your facts straight. Ron Paul believes all rights are individual rights. He doesn't see rights as gay rights or women's rights or minority rights. You have rights because you are an individual, and if being gay or female doesn't infringe on another's rights, you are free to choose your lifestyle. Ron Paul certainly doesn't endorse the gay lifestyle, but he certainly isn't against it.

And birthright citizenship has to do with the fact that we can no longer afford illegal immigrants. Illegals are here to the detriment of everyone who pays taxes (me), and they are incentivized by the free medical care and free education. It's not inhumane. It's fair.
One_Tuza on Saturday, January 12, 2008 at 11:17 AM
Wake up America! Educate yourself! If you want to know why Ron Paul wants to get rid of the Federal Reserve and the IRS, visit freedomtofascism.com and check out Aaron Russo's documentary, "America, From Freedom To Fascism" Bulk order it for $1.25 each and send it to your non-computer literate baby boomer friends, heck, all of your friends and relatives!

WE THE PEOPLE need to take back our Republic!

(BTW, I'm 62 years old)

Comment on: The Ron Paul phenomenon

In order to comment on an article, you must Log In.

SFBG Classifieds