It's a rainy day - today
Many core health service programs are wrestling with the reality of closing their doors entirely when the next round of cuts arrives in June.

OPINION As San Francisco's health and human services face unprecedented loss of funding under Mayor Gavin Newsom's glaringly disproportionate budget cuts, forcing layoffs of city and nonprofit health care workers who work on the frontlines of a strained system, now is the time when the moral implications of budget decisions mean the most.

The midyear cuts alone have eliminated HIV/AIDS services for an estimated 2,660 San Franciscans. Many core health service programs are wrestling with the reality of closing their doors entirely when the next round of cuts arrives in June. As the city scrambles to come up with any and all possible solutions, Supervisor Chris Daly has introduced an amendment to the Rainy Day Fund that would offer up a much-needed safety net for San Francisco's vital services.

Currently, San Francisco's Rainy Day Fund contains a provisional trigger focused on protecting the San Francisco Unified School District during tough times. When the Controller's Office identifies the need and pulls the trigger, Rainy Day Funds can be appropriated at the discretion of the mayor and the Board of Supervisors to offset the costs of maintaining education during the upcoming budget year.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T


Daly's clause, which would take effect in years when the city's deficit exceeds $250 million, would provide a similar safeguard to public health and human services, services that are no less critical than education but tend to bear the brunt of budget cuts during challenging economic times.

Some have argued that we should save this money for the (perpetual) "next year," with the timeless hypothetical that it could get worse. Yet for those who may lose their lives this year because of colossal cuts to vital services, this argument offers little consolation, and in fact begs the question of how we define a rainy day to begin with. While city workers are being asked to cut salaries and business leaders are being asked to support new revenue, now is the time to reach into our reserves to protect the programs that protect lives.

San Francisco's HIV/AIDS services have become, in many ways, models for the rest of the country, yet the years of battling for and finessing of these services seem to be taken for granted as we brace ourselves for the possibility of losing them overnight. Strained as our safety net may be, it still provides much of the best care available for those at risk of or living with HIV/AIDS, and in these complex budget discussions, we have yet to hear a consideration of what it would cost to reconstruct such a landscape of services.

Finding solutions to this year's budget crisis will not be easy. It will require a complex solution, and even with givebacks by city workers and even with new revenue, there will be significant cuts to programs. We need to think about all of the possibilities and understand that it will take extraordinary measures to protect a model health care system. Now is the time when San Franciscans need access to their safety net. Today is a rainy day, and baby, it's cold outside.

Stephany Joy Ashley is on the steering committee for the Coalition to Save Public Health, an executive board member of the Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club, and the harm reduction coordinator of the St. James Infirmary.


( 1 comment | Comment on this article )
hbrown on Wednesday, February 25, 2009 at 09:21 AM
Ms Ashley and Tim Redmond,

Why didn't you mention the party who de-railed the Daly plan? I'll tell the public why now. It's because that person was new D-9 supe, David Campos whom both your club (Milk) and the SFBG pushed hard for the Board over Eric Quezada and Mark Sanchez. Why didn't you write down his name? Was it David you were referring to when you wrote: "Some have argued that we should save this money for the (perpetual) 'next year' with the timeless hypothetical that it could get worse."? That's exactly what Campos said in his exchange with Daly in committee. Give the man 'credit' for authorship.

You follow that by ripping off Daly's reply: "Yet for those who may lose their lives this year because of the colossal cuts to vital services, this argument offers little consolation ... ". Hey, that's what Daly said.

Just as I warned, Campos votes Downtown when it matters. Also, he's clearly targeted Daly. It was Campos who provided the swing vote that made Bevan Dufty (who famously said: "I'm not a Progressive.") ... Campos made Dufty head of the TA (over Daly) which has a couple of billion dollars on it's plate to carve up. After Campos had repeatedly lied in his teeth during the campaign when he said: "I will vote for Progressives.". Maybe he only meant he'd vote for Progressives other than Daly.

Bottom line is that Milk and the Guardian made the difference in electing David Campos as D-9 supe and now you won't admit it was an error. His pedigree was pure Downtown (a protege of Louise Renne, for God's sake!) and you all knew it. Now, when he votes against Progressives and Progressive clauses you refuse not only to chastise him, you don't even write his name.

Tell the whole story.

Like I do.

h.

Comment on: It's a rainy day - today

In order to comment on an article, you must Log In.

SFBG Classifieds