Housing cars or people?
GREEN CITY: Supervisor Chiu introduces legislation that curtails evictions for garages

news@sfbg.com

GREEN CITY San Francisco Board of Supervisors President David Chiu has introduced legislation that would curtail the ability of residential property owners in Telegraph Hill, North Beach, and Chinatown to evict tenants and replace them with garages.

The ordinance, which is currently being reviewed by staff before it is considered by the Planning Commission, seeks to prohibit the construction of garages in rental properties that have been the site of a no-fault eviction in the past decade. Even if no evictions have occurred, owners would have to apply for a conditional use permit from the Planning Department to build the garage.

"We have seen a pattern of applications for garage installations following no-fault evictions," Chiu aide David Noyola explained.

The Ellis Act, a state law passed in 1986, gives owners the right to evict tenants if they decide to "withdraw from the rental market." The law specifies that all units in the building must be evicted. In 2005, the Board of Supervisors also began requiring landlords to pay $4,500 to each evicted tenant for relocation costs, with an additional $3,000 for seniors and the disabled.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T


Ted Gullicksen, director of the San Francisco Tenant Union, said the Ellis Act was intended to allow property owners to get out of the business of being a landlord, but "in practice it is utilized far more often by developers who are looking to rent the properties at considerable profit."

Although there are restrictions on re-renting property that has been cleared of tenants under the Ellis Act, a primary concern of tenant activists is the use of evictions to convert the building into a tenancy-in-common. A TIC is a form of joint ownership whereby multiple owners can buy the building and live in separate units.

"Often the real estate developer will try to make improvements following a TIC conversion to make it more sellable, and one of those is garages," Gullicksen said.

Malcolm Yeung, the public policy manager of the Chinatown Community Development Center, told us that "a garage generally increases the market value of a property by $30,000 to $50,000."

Yeung worked with Chiu's office to develop the legislation after arguing in a discretionary review hearing before the Planning Commission that a particular Ellis Act eviction in the Telegraph Hill neighborhood was in violation of Sec. 101.1(b) of the San Francisco Planning Code, which states "that existing housing and neighborhood character be conserved and protected in order to preserve the cultural and economic diversity of our neighborhoods."

Following the distribution of Ellis Act notices to four low-income families, the property owner also filed for a garage add-on. Yeung successfully made the case that the eviction contradicted the Planning Code's commitment to the preservation of economic diversity. He told us that the addition of garages "incentivizes owners to take on the financial costs of an Ellis Act eviction" and can "transform communities from long-term low-income residents to TICs, which go on the market at high value."

Gullicksen also said landlords often threaten an Ellis Act eviction and offer a buyout. "One of the benefits of the legislation is that it put tenants ...

Read more... Page: 1 | 2

( 7 comments | Comment on this article )
Sheriffsposse on Thursday, November 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Where to start. While the Board of Sups claim to be for the lil guy & eviction protections, there were no where to be found when Guy the Flower Guy (15th & Noe) & one other resident were evicted, along with 9 other units for a TIC conversion. All lost their apartments. Two in the group were Disabled & protected under Rent Control from eviction. When Mark Leno, Tom Ammiano & Bevan Dufty were contacted, the replies were "great, Guy has a friend like you." They did nothing, even when there was legal remedy to do so. If Malcolm Yeung & Chiu feel so inclined to make right to protect tenants, how about going after all those owners in the Avenues (and elsewhere) who converted their garages to illegal in-law living units, thus avoiding increased property taxes. No, they would do that would they? Last count, there are approximately now 50,000 rental units off the market in SF due to rent control & rent restrictions. Now they want to mandate that pets are allowed for all rental property in the City. Well, sort of hard to enforce that if the Owner has allergies to pets and wishes to keep they property dander free. This of course will pull more rent-controlled & non-rent control units off the market.
Sheriffsposse on Thursday, November 12, 2009 at 01:00 PM
Where to start. While the Board of Sups claim to be for the lil guy & eviction protections, there were no where to be found when Guy the Flower Guy (15th & Noe) & one other resident were evicted, along with 9 other units for a TIC conversion. All lost their apartments. Two in the group were Disabled & protected under Rent Control from eviction. When Mark Leno, Tom Ammiano & Bevan Dufty were contacted, the replies were "great, Guy has a friend like you." They did nothing, even when there was legal remedy to do so. If Malcolm Yeung & Chiu feel so inclined to make right to protect tenants, how about going after all those owners in the Avenues (and elsewhere) who converted their garages to illegal in-law living units, thus avoiding increased property taxes. No, they would do that would they? Last count, there are approximately now 50,000 rental units off the market in SF due to rent control & rent restrictions. Now they want to mandate that pets are allowed for all rental property in the City. Well, sort of hard to enforce that if the Owner has allergies to pets and wishes to keep they property dander free. This of course will pull more rent-controlled & non-rent control units off the market.
iitsuptous on Thursday, November 12, 2009 at 08:32 PM
I first want to say that I am allergic to animals although I love them so I probably would not be able to rent a place where an animal lived for an extended period of time, so all rentals being required to be pet friendly isn't a good idea. As well Supervisor Chiu is only one person voted to take care of his district. For those that are unhappy in other districts, remember your issues when it comes time to vote, again.
Noearch9 on Friday, November 13, 2009 at 08:49 AM
This legislation has to work both ways. What about when an owner converts a garage space (illegally) to a rental unit? Then we have one, or more cars on the street parking..

that doesnt make sense.
okamotoray on Friday, November 13, 2009 at 02:19 PM
Why not start by dealing with all the professional bums and pro panhandlers .If you coddel these sorts it only creates more and more want to be's
Guerra on Saturday, November 14, 2009 at 07:38 PM
If you own property in SF you have no right to do what you want with it. Hmmm...seems like a very Socialist idea to me. Power to the People!!
sfdrewski on Monday, November 16, 2009 at 07:53 PM
You buy the place but the Board of Supervisors/tenants own it. Yes, that's San Francisco.

The rents are high BECAUSE OF rent control. One guy living in the same place for 12 years pays $900 for his two-bedroom and another who just moved in pays $2700. You don't see guy 1 one rushing to help out guy number 2. The rents are distorted because of this lopsidedness. Add in an allowable rent increase 1-2% per year on your monthly rent but property taxes go up automatically 2% on the value of your property. You do the math: $50 a month more for the renter vs. $500 for the property owner. Folks complain about landlords but the math simply is not on their side. These "buyouts" are like hitting the lottery to tenants. Ask anyone living outside SF and they are in disbelief that a lease doesn't end when it's term is up. That you can't move into your own place without forking out $5000 to each tenant. In the end the renter will suffer simply because the rules and cost for renting become so unrealistic that either the place is left unmaintained or it is sold, taking a rental unit off of the market.

One of the things that makes this country great is the rights that property owner have. The Board of Supervisors and the "Tenants Union" are creating a class separation not, as they say, protecting the tenant. Consider the property owner's rights (mysteriously missing from these articles) the next time you read one like it or when you vote. Like most people, we all aspire to own our own place. We shouldn't be punished when we do by these populist organizations or get-me-re-elected laws.

Comment on: Housing cars or people?

In order to comment on an article, you must Log In.

SFBG Classifieds