June 4, 2003 (Vol. 37, Iss. 36)
noise.
Editors: Kimberly Chun & J.H. Tompkins
Art director: Lori Spears
Noise logo designer: J. Fish
Noise cover: Gregg Gordon for gigart.com
Music accounts executive: Chris Owen

PUNCTUM

By George Chen

Against the grain

IN HIGH SCHOOL I would go over to my friend Sam's house to listen to records. He was a vegetarian, probably still is, and knew way more about punk rock than I did. My listening habits were eclectic, a euphemism for regrettable. Sam and his friends, who did zines and dressed funny and didn't eat meat or do drugs, were privy to another world. He played me a record by a band called Born Against, and it was more confusing and chaotic than I could fathom, and I would not acquire the taste for it till much later. I felt more at home with poppier fare, or even Strawman, who were poppy but political. It stuck with me anyway, the inkling of an underground seeping through our suburban network.

About 10 years after they broke up, Born Against are seeing a resurgence. Emerging out of New York's ABC No Rio scene, the hardcore band ascended during the first Bush administration, writing songs about abortion rights, cops, corporations, and liberal complicity while pushing the buttons of orthodox punks. As vocalist Sam McPheeters's own label, Vermiform, went under last year, Kill Rock Stars and Prank Records took over the repress duties for the two Born Against collections, The Rebel Sound of Shit and Failure and Patriotic Battle Hymns, which came out in the spring.

Maybe "resurgence" isn't accurate – Born Against records must have consistently sold well enough to warrant keeping them in print. In the past decade Born Against and Vermiform have influenced a ton of hardcore bands and labels. From the absurdly confrontational and sacrilegious name to the graphic design and McPheeters's hoarse howl and sarcasm, Born Against casts a narrow but lengthy shadow across this sector.

What does it say about our culture now when one of the most overt political statement available on the market is a decade-old hardcore record? You could say that Born Against are needed now more than ever as a response to the growing conservatism of a reinvigorated right-wing America, but then you would have to wonder how much good it did the first time around. The music holds up to scrutiny – the songs are passionate anthems of rage and confusion, wittily executed. Yet maybe political music doesn't really change how people live their lives – it alleviates guilt yet is still a part of a corporate commerce structure. Owning a Rage Against the Machine record does not a revolutionary make, nor did hearing the ultraleft Strawman radicalize the teenage me.

Men's Recovery Project, McPheeters's post-Born Against group, seem to speak to his dissatisfaction with overt political content. Shooting for theatrical absurdity, he would dress up in colonial garb and recite the entire "Give me liberty or give me death" speech by Patrick Henry. One urban legend about MRP involves a performance consisting of mooning the crowd, a cookie, and driving away as fast as possible. The performance-art direction of MRP is hinted at on the last track on Rebel Sound, a dirgey chugfest with samples from a Donahue show featuring McPheeters as a repentant caller. You can almost hear the gate click as McPheeters crosses the line between preaching to the converted and pranking the masses.

McPheeters alludes to punk's dirty little secret in the press notes for the KRS reissues. All of its state-smashy rhetoric aside, punk – hardcore specifically – is a sort of class cross-dressing. "Observers have since noted the obvious – that it is obnoxious for those with funds to critique those without funds, especially over issues where money is involved and certainly there is something deeply gross about a song like 'Well Fed Fuck' when sung by someone who is in the process of shedding a small personal fortune."

This never occurred to me when I was trying to decode the suburban revolution of the early '90s, but it's an unavoidable contradiction today. McPheeters is hardly a déclassé Brahman, and he is assuredly living leaner than Michael Moore, but it explains a lot about a subculture based on voluntary withdrawal from the shackles of class and family. This is a contradiction that I could relate to, cranking Born Against through headphones at my cushy dot-com job, the same workplace where a coworker would bafflingly sport a T-shirt that read "Portrait of Poverty."

There is music that gives me glimpses of a way out, and Born Against are an example of this because they were cynics confronting the closed minds of the scene that birthed them. Around the same time that hardcore closed ranks, there was riot grrrl, there was Nirvana, there was a swell of youth disenchantment ready to mobilize into consciousness-raising blocs. Most of that kinetic potential got absorbed, dissipated by its overexposure. Was this, as another voice of that era might say, a case of "selling kids to other kids"? McPheeters might concur, as he writes that Born Against "probably would have been doomed to irrelevance even if it hadn't lost its financing. Shows that in 1989 had attracted middle-aged hippie couples and kindly squatters and benevolent, bucktoothed skinheads were, by 1993, a sea of disinterested young boys with backpacks." After a decade of this, of hauling my backpack everywhere, I need a change. Please tell me, show me, that things are actually going to be different.