D.I.Y. campaign-finance search? Good luck with that!
By Rebecca Bowe
This week, the Guardian offers a look at the biggest spenders in local politics, using SF Ethics Commission campaign-finance data from 1998 to 2008. The Ethics’ Campaign Finance Database is an excellent tool for answering questions about which organizations have given money to which causes and candidates over the years, but the system could be a lot more user friendly.
For instance, plunging into the bowels of the SF Ethics Commission database to try and find out who’s opening the fattest wallets come election time isn’t as easy a task as the average voter might hope. Although the information is a matter of public record that’s available to everyone, there is no ranking system that makes the highest donors easy to spot – so researchers literally have to pick through tens of thousands of data rows in order to spot the high contributions. Meanwhile, there are limitations with the short-cut method of finding such information, which is to use the “Advanced Search” function on the city agency’s Web page. That search engine spits back incomplete results: Our No. 2 top donor, for example, doesn’t show up, even though a comprehensive search of the campaign-finance spreadsheet from 2001 reveals that he contributed some $3.5 million to his own run for mayor.
When we queried Ethics staff about the gaps in the data, and requested any information that could further explain the inconsistencies, we learned that the matter had been discussed internally. In a recent email, an Ethics staffer noted:
“We did post a notice on our website that there was a small percentage of irregularities concerning historical data. We have since addressed most of these irregularities and as explained above, we must prioritize how we focus our limited resources. We will not assign further resources to these matters.”
Researchers, proceed with caution. To get accurate and comprehensive information about contributions to local political campaigns, the recommendation is to download the entire campaign-finance database from the SF Ethics Commission Web site for the year you’re interested in, and then befriend an Excel wizard who can help sort through it. Or, you could just read our list of Top 30 Political Donors from 1998 to 2008.
Also from this author
Lawsuit alleges America's Cup organizers unfairly rejected African American sailing team and breached trustee duties by self-dealing
The revolution will not be powered by smartphones (but these apps might help it along)
Most Commented On
Recent comments
- The GOP were also written off in 2008 when Obama won and then - May 25, 2013
- "We never miss a chance to prove how politically savvy we are" - May 25, 2013
- Some do; some don't. - May 25, 2013
- Because they don't want to admit they're the patsies. - May 25, 2013
- My bad. Apologies to the real Starchild. - May 25, 2013
- Some great examples of non-Islamic terrorism, Gr, but - May 25, 2013
- "I get the wage I get because - May 25, 2013
- "The worst part of this is - May 25, 2013
- "This was not the case in my - May 25, 2013
- You said your combined income is over 100K - May 25, 2013








