SFBG › Politics Blog ›
Oil company profits vs. education
03.09.10 - 1:35 pm | Tim Redmond |
(4)

I like Darrell Steinberg's idea: The people protesting cuts in education should sign on to the oil-severance tax bill, and then force the Republicans to decide whether they want to protect the oil companies or fund public education.
Not that the crazy no-new-taxes folks will come around and do the right thing, but the issue will be pretty clear; it's not, as Gloria Romero argues, a Sophie's Choice:
We don't want to cut education. The thing you have to ask is, are you willing to yank the dentures out of the mouths of the elderly? Am I willing to take away that wheelchair?"
It's oil company profits against the future of the state. Let's let Meg Whitman run for governor on that platform.
Most Commented On
Recent comments
- Last time I went to Trader - February 13, 2012
- Don't be envious, Barton. Those city workers will find - February 13, 2012
- The vast majority have jobs and insurance - February 13, 2012
- Barton, quit whining that "it's not fair" - February 13, 2012
- for the people who pass on - February 13, 2012
- Damn - February 13, 2012
- What is wrong with you? - February 13, 2012
- About District 10 - February 12, 2012
- If it was not for the drones, - February 12, 2012
- Concept of work - February 12, 2012








Comments