SFBG › Politics Blog ›
Oil company profits vs. education
03.09.10 - 1:35 pm | Tim Redmond |
(4)

I like Darrell Steinberg's idea: The people protesting cuts in education should sign on to the oil-severance tax bill, and then force the Republicans to decide whether they want to protect the oil companies or fund public education.
Not that the crazy no-new-taxes folks will come around and do the right thing, but the issue will be pretty clear; it's not, as Gloria Romero argues, a Sophie's Choice:
We don't want to cut education. The thing you have to ask is, are you willing to yank the dentures out of the mouths of the elderly? Am I willing to take away that wheelchair?"
It's oil company profits against the future of the state. Let's let Meg Whitman run for governor on that platform.
Also from this author
Most Commented On
Recent comments
- Oh Yes - May 23, 2013
- Welcome to the new mission - May 23, 2013
- Moving to Brisbane or Timbuktu won't solve Airbnb's tax problem - May 23, 2013
- "Affordable" for who? - May 23, 2013
- what is the writer's point? - May 23, 2013
- Yeah...who the fuck moves in - May 23, 2013
- OK, Guest, so your great idea here is that AirBnB should - May 23, 2013
- It sucks that the mission is - May 23, 2013
- Black-on white crime is 50 times higher than - May 23, 2013
- Yes, and in fact CraigsList works great for short-term lets and - May 23, 2013









Comments