SFBG › Politics Blog ›
Oil company profits vs. education
03.09.10 - 1:35 pm | Tim Redmond |
(4)

I like Darrell Steinberg's idea: The people protesting cuts in education should sign on to the oil-severance tax bill, and then force the Republicans to decide whether they want to protect the oil companies or fund public education.
Not that the crazy no-new-taxes folks will come around and do the right thing, but the issue will be pretty clear; it's not, as Gloria Romero argues, a Sophie's Choice:
We don't want to cut education. The thing you have to ask is, are you willing to yank the dentures out of the mouths of the elderly? Am I willing to take away that wheelchair?"
It's oil company profits against the future of the state. Let's let Meg Whitman run for governor on that platform.
Also from this author
Most Commented On
Recent comments
- Xorauguynaetcvh - May 19, 2013
- The same question could be asked of you. - May 19, 2013
- You have a problem with people sending money - May 19, 2013
- SF RE prices are up 30% in the last year. - May 19, 2013
- Bad analogy. Slaves were not paid. - May 19, 2013
- Employment is a contract between consenting adults - May 19, 2013
- So the Chinese should only be allowed to rent here? - May 19, 2013
- And yet Randy must be very effective otherwise - May 19, 2013
- No names, cases or specific references then? - May 19, 2013
- all you did was get born here - May 19, 2013









Comments