Let the ICE picket begin

|
(7)

Members of the San Francisco Immigrant Rights Defense Committee launched a picket outside US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)’s Detention and Removal Operations office at 630 Sansome Street today to decry the activation of Secure Communities, which they describe as a “dangerous police-ICE collaboration program that threatens public safety.”

“In the wake of massive protests this weekend against Arizona’s anti-immigrant law, a broad coalition of immigrant rights advocates will stage a protest Tuesday in San Francisco against the implementation of a new police-ICE collaboration initiative which will harm public safety, the so-called 'Secure' Communities or S-Comm program,” SFIRDC’s press release states.

Concerned community members plan to form a picket line holding placards of enlarged fingerprints and multi-lingual messages “to expose the danger the program poses to the community."

 “If we oppose Arizona’s SB1070, then we cannot stand aside while a dangerous policy with disturbing similarities to SB1070 is forced on our own city,” Carolina Morales of Community United Against Violence stated. “S-Comm gives dangerous discretion to police officers to falsely arrest or overcharge immigrant residents, who would then be automatically reported for deportation.”

The picket comes as a veto-proof majority of eight SF Supervisors stands poised to vote next week (there is no Board meeting today) on a resolution calling on local law enforcement to opt-out of S-Comm, noting that the policy “puts at risk even those subject to arrest for a minor infraction and those who did not commit any crime at all but were falsely arrested. “

To date, the Mayor’s Office has not indicated that Newsom has any concerns with the program.
But San Francisco Sheriff Michael Hennessey, who requested to opt out of the program, has stated that S-Comm "will widen the net (of people reported to ICE) excessively" and that ICE has a “record of secrecy."

Last year, the California Dept. of Justice signed a memorandum with ICE on the S-Comm program; the cover letter indicated that counties needed to agree to the program by signing a “statement of intent.” But last week, Attorney General Brown denied the Sheriff’s request to opt out, so community and legal advocates continue to explore their options.
 
 “The Attorney General is mistaken in believing that this program will only affect people who have already been apprehended and deported by ICE or charged with serious offenses,” said Francisco Ugarte, an immigrant rights attorney with Dolores Street Community Services.

.
 According to ICE's own data, 5  percent of the people identified under the S-Comm program were U.S. citizens, and some 9 out of 10 of the total identified were charged with low level offenses, including property and traffic violations, not serious crimes.
And then there’s the fact that ICE’s data does not indicate whether those deported were actually found guilty of crimes, or were simply charged with crimes—a key distinction for anyone who professes to believe in human rights.

 “Our city’s families are living in fear that if they report a threat to their own safety, they or their family member may risk deportation, “ Nour Chammas with the Arab Resource and Organizing Center stated in SFIRDC’s press release. “This policy will tear at the very fabric of San Francisco’s rich and diverse culture."

And Bobbi Lopez of La Voz Latina observed that folks are working on a federal level for immigration reform because they know real solutions to a broken immigration system.  “However, we cannot just sit idly by and wait while ICE’s police collaboration schemes threaten our families daily,” Lopez warned. “ We are proud that city officials are standing with community members to halt this attack on our San Francisco community.” 

Today’s picket was called for by the following members of SFIRDC:
African Advocacy Network, Arab Resource and Organizing Center, Asian Law Caucus,
CARECEN, Causa Justa: Just Cause, Chinese for Affirmative Action, Chinese Progressive Association, Communities United Against Violence, Dolores Street Community Services, East Bay Alliance for Sustainable Economy, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, Instituto Familiar de la Raza, La Raza Centro Legal / SF Day Labor Program, La Voz Parents Council, Mujeres Unidas y Activas, National Lawyers Guild SF Bay Area Chapter, People Organizing to Demand Environmental & Economic Rights, People Organized to Win Employment Rights, SF Pride at Work, and South of Market Community Action Network.

Comments

I would be interested in if these people on the cities commission are representing themselves as representatives of the city when there doesn't seem to be any real rights issues here.

Real rights issues.

Posted by Mr Matlock on Jun. 01, 2010 @ 5:45 pm

Why the fear? The majority of people in the USA never see the inside of the local police department. If a person goes deep enough into the building to be fingerprinted, the community deserves to know who the person really is. What about the victims ,Collateral Damage, as we try to be everything to everybody? Go to jail (citizen/ not citizen) and your prints are ran then ... that DUI means something.

Posted by Brenda1 on Jun. 01, 2010 @ 10:56 pm

It's amazing to me that people would like to protect those who are being arrested for local / state crimes and then are found out to be, also, illegal. Tell me again who is "attacking the community?"

Posted by Guest on Jun. 02, 2010 @ 9:10 am

These picketers are hypocrites. If a law does not favor them, they picket and scream racism, civil right violations. blah blah. those are federal laws that are being implemented for the safety of American communities. You endanger more the public by not implementing SCOMM. If you don't want to be falsely arrested, then DON'T COMMIT any violation, any crime, any bad behavior that will invite scrutiny. After all, the requirement of GOOD MORAL CHARACTER is a primary requirement for immigrants, as stated in the law (all legal residents already know that). If you falsely arrest 5 %, then that's a good start, at least you apprehended 95 % bad, potentially dangerous aliens. Then give the ICE time to lower down that 5 %. Be realistic, there is no 100 %, dumb-proof system. It is because of this system that we have deported many potential terrorists post 9/11.

I am also an immigrant and I enjoin the others to obey and respect the laws of our host country. They already allowed us to stay here, what else are you guys demanding.

Posted by The Hypocrites on Jun. 02, 2010 @ 12:14 pm

There is a statue in New York harbor. It's called the Statue of Liberty. And I suppose if one were to ask most people in this nation what they think of the Statue of Liberty the response would be something like this: "Oh I love the Statue of Liberty, and freedom and all." That's what they would likely say out of one side of their mouth. Then out of the other side of their mouth many of the same people would be screaming hate at undocumented immigrants who are just trying to survive and feed themselves and their families. Yet this is the inscription on the Statue of Liberty:

"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me.
I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

...which is an open policy that's remarkable!

The people who hate on undocumented immigrants are some of the same haters who dump on the homeless, yet "the homeless" are mentioned in this above inscription on the Statue of Liberty. This inscription says nothing about "waiting in line to become documented." It says nothing about any paperwork or time process which the haters who can't stand undocumented immigrants like to go on about.

Judging by many comments of hate I read on the Internet, the Statue of Liberty has become meaningless and if they had their way, this nation would have to crate the thing up and ship it back to France and replace it with a symbol of oppression and hate (the swastika comes to my mind).

This is a nation of immigrants and if one is not a direct descendant of the Native Americans, YOU are "illegal" [sic] too whether you were born here or not.

A question for the haters: Assuming you even live here in San Francisco or in this nation, if this nation has a natural disaster---perhaps soon---and large segments of the population are forced to evacuate, where will you go? You can't possibly go south of the border or north of the border because in both circumstances, you would be undocumented and one knows you wouldn't think of being a hypocrite and going south or north. So what would you do, sit here and rot? (Not a bad idea for people septic with the cancer of hate).

Also, when is Bush3's (Obama's) ICE going to start rounding up EMPLOYERS who hire undocumented immigrants and run them through the so-called "Secure Communities" process?

And when are the millions of jobs from this nation which have been outsourced coming back from China, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, the Philippines and South Africa?

Posted by Sam on Jun. 02, 2010 @ 8:52 pm

Maybe you should look back in history, When Europeans were entering this country they needed to be documented. As a matter of fact ships would be met at port and they would be documented as they left the ship. Also the last time I checked Mexico was a democracy as well so you cannot use "to breathe free" as an excuse.
And Before laying down smack on this country and our laws I suggest you look up the Draconian laws that are in place for anyone immigrating to Mexico wether lawfully or unlawfully.
I would like to be able to enter a country illigally get my credit score zapped, pick up a Brand NEW car, and maybe if I can't find a job have the State and Fed hook me up with free money that I never earned.
That is my biggest gripe. We already have enough American Citizens who feed off the state. They do nothing with their lives but make babies. If Illigals want to be in this Great Nation so bad they should learn our language, lets see how far you get just speaking English in Mexico, get documented and pay taxes. Hell the Language part could even wait, simply because English is the Hardest language to learn. On the Same front I believe Americans should make an attempt to learn a second language.
I cannot blame anyone for wanting to live here. But RESPECT our laws. Almost all of Hispanics and South Americans I met and befriended are huge on respect. Give us the same.

Posted by Guest on Jun. 12, 2010 @ 8:53 am

I'm surprised at the hatred and xenophobia sweeping this nation. For decades we have been peaceful and harmonious, but now we want to racially profile and harass immigrants. What has changed?

These immigrants come to the US because of Americans. We're the ones buying their drugs. We're the ones refusing to take unskilled jobs. We're the ones hiring them. So why complain when they come here?

People who support the harassment and profiling of immigrants are hypocrites.

They decry hard-working immigrants fighting to improve their lives while they themselves sit and home, collecting welfare and benefits that we have to pay for. Guess what, I'm not paying my taxes to support you so you can come online and spew bigotry.

Go to school, get a job, make something of your life instead of spewing all this xenophobic nonsense!

Posted by Guest on Jul. 27, 2010 @ 1:31 pm