Arrests made as hotel workers and their supporters target Hyatt

|
(5)

Images by Ramsey El-Qare, who contributed to this report.

An ongoing labor conflict between the hospitality workers union Unite-Here Local 2 and the Hyatt Corporation boiled over into the streets yesterday (7/22) with a union-organized protest and civil disobedience outside the Grand Hyatt San Francisco hotel. Union leaders see the action as another step in the fight for their members’ workplace rights. Hotel management called the action a staged spectacle and a waste of energy that would be better spent at the bargaining table.
San Francisco hospitality workers have been without a contract for nearly a year as Local 2 and hotel management of several corporations have reached an impasse over securing health care benefits, pension improvement, wage increases, and the right to organize without intimidation from employers. San Francisco Police Department Sgt. Tadao Yamaguchi confirmed that 150 demonstrators were arrested after blocking Stockton Street outside the Grand Hyatt San Francisco hotel. All were cited and released.

“The Hyatt Corporation has repeatedly said they want workers to pay hundreds of dollars per month for family medical,” Local 2 spokeswoman Riddhi Mehta told the Guardian. “Workers have sacrificed wages for decades to keep health care, to the point that their average income is $30,000 to $35,000 per year.”

Hyatt spokesman Peter Hillman told the Guardian that management wants to renegotiate the health care portion of the contract, but that negotiations hadn’t reached the point to make specific demands for worker contributions to the plan.

“They are sitting on top of $35 million that could be used to help address the overall health care plan that hasn’t been addressed in 30 years,” Hillman told us. “If there is finger pointing on profits and all that, I would ask them why they haven’t opened up that?”

Mehta told the Guardian that $35 million is in an health and welfare trust fund specifically for emergencies, like earthquakes or lockouts in which union members aren’t working enough hours to get health benefits. Local 2 President Mike Casey told the Guardian that the union does not control the trust fund. It’s managed by trustees from both employers and the union. “Bringing this up is it’s a delay tactic on their part,” Mehta said.

Casey, who was arrested during the demonstration, said it was a success. “We’re going to win,” he said. “It’s going to take some time. It’s a question of who's going to last one day longer than the other side.”

“The game Unite Here is playing is to generate more union membership, to some extent at the expense of the current membership,” Hillman said. “These are staged spectacles. The energy would be better spent at the bargaining table and we encourage Local 2 to come back to that.”

To watch video of the action taken by the Guardian, click here, here, here, here, and here.


Comments

The New York Times
November 19, 2009

Some Organizers Protest Their Union’s Tactics
By STEVEN GREENHOUSE

After six years working in the laundry of a Miami hotel, Julia Rivera was thrilled when her union tapped her to become a full-time union organizer.

But her excitement soon turned to outrage.

Ms. Rivera said her supervisors at Unite Here, the hotel and restaurant workers’ union, repeatedly pressed her to reveal highly personal information, getting her to divulge that her father had sexually abused her.

Later, she said, her supervisors ordered her to recount her tale of abuse again and again to workers they were trying to unionize at Tampa International Airport, convinced that Ms. Rivera’s story would move them, making them more likely to join the union.

“I was scared not to do what they said,” said Ms. Rivera, adding that she resented being pressured to disclose intimate information and then speak about it in public. “To me, it was sick. It was horrible.”

Ms. Rivera and other current and former Unite Here organizers are speaking out against what they say is a longstanding practice in which Unite Here officials pressured subordinates to disclose sensitive personal information — for example, that their mother was an alcoholic or that they were fighting with their spouse.

More than a dozen organizers said in interviews that they had often been pressured to detail such personal anguish — sometimes under the threat of dismissal from their union positions — and that their supervisors later used the information to press them to comply with their orders.

“It’s extremely cultlike and extremely manipulative,” said Amelia Frank-Vitale, a Yale graduate and former hotel union organizer who said these practices drove her to see a therapist.

Several organizers grew incensed when they discovered that details of their history had been put into the union’s database so that supervisors could use that information to manipulate them.

“This information is extremely personal,” said Matthew Edwards, an organizer who had disclosed that he was from a broken home and was overweight when young. “It is catalogued and shared throughout the whole organizing department.”

Labor professors, as well as union leaders and members, said such practices were not at all typical of organized labor.

John W. Wilhelm, Unite Here’s president, condemned the tactics. “I have zero tolerance for inappropriate intrusions into people’s private and personal lives,” he said. “I have not personally used these techniques, and I have taken a very strong stand against them.”

Mr. Wilhelm said the practice, known as pink sheeting after the color of the paper that private details were recorded on, was rare and had never been widespread at Unite Here.

He said the organized campaign to condemn it is largely part of a propaganda effort by the Service Employees International Union.

Early this year, Unite Here split apart, with one faction merging with the service employees union, which Mr. Wilhelm accused of raiding his union and trying to take it over.

But several Unite Here organizers described high-pressure meetings where they were brought to tears as supervisors pushed them, sometimes in front of a dozen colleagues, to divulge personal information in what several organizers said was an effort to break their will and ensure their obedience.

Some said supervisors, soon after hiring them, had tricked them by disclosing a few personal details over lunch and then pressing them to reciprocate with their own secrets.

Mr. Edwards and five other organizers responsible for arranging boycotts against nonunion hotels resigned from Unite Here last summer to protest pink sheeting.

“My supervisor raised that my dad is dead and so and so, don’t you feel abandoned,” said Greg Hoffman, whose late father was a labor relations professor at Michigan State University. “It’s this weird psychoanalysis. A lot of times I thought, ‘What does this have to do with my job?’ ”

Mr. Wilhelm said that he was cracking down on what pink sheeting existed. Unite Here leaders issued new guidelines in early 2008 and again in early 2009, in theory banning the practice. But several organizers detailed numerous instances of pink sheeting in recent months despite that supposed ban.

These organizers said the question sheets were no longer pink, had been renamed “motivation sheets” and contained such questions as, “What risks or difficulties has your target undergone in her/his personal life?”

Among the information on several pink sheets was:

“Her childhood was a mess. Her mother was extremely passive aggressive. She would stop speaking to her children sometimes.”

“Has social anxiety disorder. She should have been on medication or in therapy but her parents refused.”

“Mom was not around growing up. She’s heard from her twice. Once to ask for money.”

Several organizers said supervisors wanted this information so organizers could inspire prospective union members by telling them things like, “I suffered sexual abuse or I was an alcoholic, and thanks to the union, I overcame it.”

Numerous organizers said their supervisors, having pink-sheeted them, had in turn ordered them to elicit highly personal information from workers they were seeking to unionize.

Maria, a former hotel housekeeper and former organizer in Los Angeles, said workers she had sought to unionize often grew cold toward the union because of the personal questions organizers asked them.

She said her supervisors got her to reveal that her stepfather had abused her physically and psychologically. She insisted on not disclosing her last name because of this personal information.

“I wanted to change conditions at my workplace,” Maria said. “I was ready to fight for respect for workers. But this entire thing felt like a total lack of respect. I quit the union because I felt this was psychological abuse.”

In October, four hotel union organizers — Sean Abbott-Klafter, Crystal Stermer, Lohl Berning and Tenaya Lafore — wrote an open letter to the labor movement decrying pink sheeting as an effort to obtain “emotionally vulnerable information.”

“This practice is a cynical and manipulative system of control,” they wrote. “It is a tactic designed to keep those involved in the union’s work from straying from the directives of the union leadership.”

Unite Here is one of the nation’s most aggressive organizing unions and is particularly strong in Chicago, Las Vegas, Los Angeles and New York.

Unite Here was formed in 2004, when Unite, the apparel workers union, merged with Here, the hotel employees and restaurant employees union, which Mr. Wilhelm once headed and where several organizers say pink-sheeting originated. Last January, Bruce Raynor, once the apparel workers’ president, led more than 100,000 workers to break away, form a new union and merge with the service employees.

Three of the former organizers of hotel boycotts — Mr. Edwards, Mr. Hoffman and Arlen Jones — said they were protesting pink sheeting because they found it repugnant, not because they wanted to help the service employees battle Mr. Wilhelm.

Lorena Lopez, a Unite Here lead organizer in Los Angeles who began working for the hotel employees union a decade ago, said that she never witnessed any pink sheeting and that any criticisms were “a pathetic attempt by S.E.I.U. to discredit our union.”

She said the personal stories that supervisors elicited were typically about workers not being able to afford health insurance or food for their families.

Several organizers likened pink sheeting to a practice that Cesar Chavez, former president of the United Farm Workers, used when he embraced a mind-control practice developed by Synanon, a drug rehabilitation center founded in Santa Monica, Calif. Union staff members were systematically subjected to intense, prolonged verbal abuse in an effort to break them down and assure loyalty.

Mr. Wilhelm’s supporters often seek to discredit critics of pink sheeting as tools of the service employees, noting that Ms. Frank-Vitale worked for that union after quitting the hotel workers union, and that Ms. Rivera now works for Workers United, the union that split from Unite Here.

Ms. Frank-Vitale, now a graduate student at American University, says she is still haunted by memories of pink sheeting.

“One night my supervisor pushed me and pushed me, and I started talking about being an overweight woman in America, what that was like in high school, that it was very difficult for me,” she said. “I felt kind of violated.”

She said she was not protesting pink sheeting to help a particular side in a partisan battle. “I don’t care if this union splits or stays together,” she said. “I care about stopping this creepy, cultlike form of organizing.”

Posted by Guest on Jul. 24, 2010 @ 11:28 am

Can't say the union is right. We are in a recession and the hotel business is down.
Everyone should pay their fair share like everyone else employed by other companies. WAKEUP PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!The free ride is over. ENOUGH OF THIS NONSENSE.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 24, 2010 @ 10:30 pm

who ever posted the steven greenhouse article is a hater lil kid and im not gna put their name out there, but you know who u r. go do something else with ur time besides get mad at the job you chose to leave.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 26, 2010 @ 12:44 pm

and to the person who says hotel business is down, you obviously haven't actually done any research on the topic. in fact hyatt continues to make billions in profits and opened over 25 new hotels in 2010 alone and over 45 in 2009. so check your facts and economics. and then go tlak to the actual workers. then feel free to actually comment.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 26, 2010 @ 12:46 pm

means hotel business is down in the city.

The actual workers are going to have their work contracted out sooner or later. Not for that at all, but that is where this is heading.

Posted by matlock on Jul. 26, 2010 @ 2:40 pm

Related articles

  • Happy May Day, San Francisco

  • Labor protests Postal Service privatization amid deal with Staples

  • Rise of the machines

    CAREERS AND ED: From flipping burgers to making sexy, robots are catching up

  • Also from this author

  • Prison for killer cop

    Disappointed by the lenient sentence, Grant supporters vow to continue fighting for justice

  • Community Congress convened

    Local progressives adopt policy platform they hope will inform future elections and agendas

  • PG&E CEO paints a rosy picture for CPUC