DCCC seats are fine for Newsom, just not supervisors

Newsom wants the DCCC to change its bylaws to give him a seat, hoping to thwart the progressive majority.

Mayor Gavin Newsom is seeking to be seated on the San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee when it swears in newly elected members tonight, even though the body's legal counsel says he's not entitled to a seat and Newsom has put a measure of the November ballot that would prohibit local officials from serving on that body.

Newsom and his supporters, most prominently DCCC member and District 8 supervisorial candidate Scott Wiener – who fears the progressive-dominated body will endorse and support his more progressive opponent, Rafael Mandelman – argue that being the Democratic nominee for lieutenant governor should give him a seat on the DCCC.

But the longtime legal counsel for DCCC, Lance Olson, doesn't agree, citing bylaws that indicate that only nominees for statewide offices currently held by Democrats get seats on the body. So District Attorney Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee to succeed Attorney General Jerry Brown, gets an ex officio seat (those held by state and federal elected officials and regional party leaders) but Newsom doesn't because he's running against incumbent Lieutenant Governor Abel Maldonado, a Republican.

DCCC chair Aaron Peskin, a political opponent of Newsom, told us the rules are the rules and that if Newsom thinks that it's in the interests of the Democratic Party for him to have a seat, “He's going to need to make an argument why we should amend the rules.” Peskin even offered to introduce a rule change for discussion if Newsom does so.

While Wiener wrote (in a letter quoted by the Chronicle) that seating Newsom would be about party unity, Peskin notes that Newsom has actually been a practitioner of the “politics of spite and division,” particularly after he responded to the success of the progressive DCCC slate in the June election by trying to ban local officeholders from the body (several progressive members of the Board of Supervisors successfully ran for the DCCC), claiming the body should be like a farm team for building the party.

“It really begs the question: why is he seeking to do himself what he doesn't want others to do?” Peskin asked.

Newsom's office didn't respond to our inquires about the matter. BTW, in his letter to Peskin, Newsom proposed that attorney John Shanley be his proxy and journalist and political gadfly Warren Hinckle be his alternate. The meeting begins at 7 p.m. in the state building at 455 Golden Gate.


Rafael, I thought at least twice before responding to this. I am cognizant of the fact that the support of loudmouthed radical geriactic curmudgeons can be Damoclean, so I would like to stress that my opinions are in no way reflective of, or sanctioned by, the Mandelman Campaign or any of it's fiduciaries, trustees, officers or other such persions; though I do believe, hope and trust that, if elected, he would continue to be true to his stated commitment of working for the public good and welfare of all, unlike so many who have preceded him and, once having attained 'public office', have used their position to craft deals and compromises to grease their snake-like slither up the ladder of 'success'.
The future of our town as a living, inclusive, multi-cultural, precious community that is still worthy of the name of our patron saint, is in jeopardy. Legend has it that while praying at the Chapel of St Damians, Francis 'heard a voice' saying - "Go, Francis, repair my house, which as you see is falling into ruin".
OK, hold your horses, I'm not suggesting anyone is, or can be, the savior or the second coming; we are the only ones who can save ourselves and our 'home', but we have to be eternally vigilant - and confrontational.
Newsom is just the latest in a depressingly long line of privileged, 'connected', self aggrandising, empty suits, (think George Bush/Texas Rangers) who would still be tooting and tippling, if the money-changers had not financed their sorry 'careers' in order to push their own agenda.
The upcoming District elections may not be of such significance in the grand scheme, but they could give us an opportunity to assert that the problems of a significant number of little people amount to more than just a hill of beans in this crazy world.
Just my 2c.

Posted by Guest Patrick Monk on Jul. 28, 2010 @ 7:18 pm

Seems pretty clear-cut. If the bylaws explicitly state that only nominees for statewide office held by democrats get a seat then Newsom shouldn't be seated. I'll take the independent legal council's opinion on the matter over Weiner's terribly self-serving position.

If Newsom and Weiner don't like the composition of the democratically elected DCCC then they should run better candidates in DCCC elections. Simple solution.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 29, 2010 @ 12:28 pm

Gavin is a H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E

Posted by Guest on Aug. 16, 2010 @ 10:42 pm