Ednorsement interviews: Bus drivers on Prop. G

|
(3)

Advocates for Muni drivers came to the Guardian this week to make the case for voters to reject Proposition G, which would remove their pay guarantees from the city charter, and to argue that the union has been unfairly demonized by Mayor Gavin Newsom, Sup. Sean Elsbernd and other city officials in an effort to deflect blame for problems with the troubled transit system.

The group included top Transport Workers Union Local 250A officials Irwin Lum and Rafael Cabrera, Bob Planthold with Senior Action Network, and Frank Lara with More Public Transit Coalition (which was spearheaded by the ANSWER Coalition). “Muni is broken and needs drastic change. It needs to be changed from the top to the bottom,” Lum began.

Yet he said targeting Muni drivers, most of whom are people of color doing a difficult job in one of the country's most complex systems, doesn't solve a problem that goes far beyond work rules and salaries. The problem lies with lack of resources and the political will to pursue them, they said, which is why the union supported proposals to reform the Municipal Transportation Authority governing structure and pursue significant revenue options, which were discussed but ultimately abandoned by the Board of Supervisors earlier this year.

“Too many people at City Hall are looking to cover their political rear ends,”said Planthold, who advocates for the rights of those with disabilities and has studied transit systems around the country.

Newsom has repeatedly singled out TWU as the one public employee union that didn't agree to givebacks to help close the city's budget deficit, and even some progressives have told the Guardian that the union hasn't done itself any favors with its intransigent stance. But Lum said union leaders were prepared try to sell their members on a deal that included forgoing raises and accepting unpaid furlough days but that Newsom was too quick to leak news of the deal to the media for political reasons, causing TWU members to dig in and reject the deal before that education process could begin.

While the city and MTA may save $10 million through the measure, they said that was small change compared to the system's real needs, which they estimated to be around $125 million, much of which could be brought in by creating transit assessment districts to charge big employers whose workers rely on Muni.

Click below to read the complete interview.

 

TWU by endorsements2010

 

Comments

That made me sad. At the same time everyone else is giving back something it's incredible that these over-pampered POS bus drivers would seriously try to convince us that they have the right to continue to push the city towards insolvency with their ridiculous demands. Unbelievable.

It's unfortunate for them that they didn't accept Newsom's offer because the voters are going to have far less sympathy for their arguments than he would have.

Posted by Lucretia Snapples on Sep. 17, 2010 @ 3:04 pm

The Operator are not the reason for the hole that the City of San Francisco is in.. I know that you are
smarter than that!! The operators took furlough days when it wasn't even manditory.. They don't make $100K per year unless they are prepared to stay
behind the wheel, 24/7, 7 days a week, for 365 days in a year.. "Do the simple math" The MTA has been mismanaging funds and are trying to put the blame on the Operators. They don't handle the Budget nor, Scheduling. If the board of
Supervisors get there hands on the controls, It is going to be bad for the public as well.. There will
be more service shuffling. ( they are calling it service restoration) .. Just
a reminder, your dealing with Politicians.. FYI.. Superviser Elsbernd has already
lied on the Operators... Do your own homework.. Don't be a follower!!

Posted by Guest on Sep. 21, 2010 @ 8:56 pm

I Have been driving for the last 10 years and I know for a fact that prop G is only going to hurt the all the bad properties of this bill are being hidden by bad politics and lies coming from the mayor's office. San Francisco is one of the only cities with a huge transportation system that get's dumped on every day of the week by City hall. Many lies are to make the drivers look as if they are over paid, the fact of the matter is that most drivers can't even afford to live in San Francisco another fact is that drivers don't control the budget or the Money behind it and as you well know they really don't control how people misbehave while riding public transportation. A driver could get in a whole lot of trouble just for saying the wrong thing to any rider. I know in my heart must of the public weather they ride buses or not will see through Sean Elsbernd 's Crapp

Posted by Guest on Sep. 25, 2010 @ 11:08 am

Also from this author

  • City weighs artificial turf fields in Golden Gate Park

  • Outer Mission opposition

    HERBWISE: "People who are ignorant assume we're all a bunch of hoodlums or stoners looking to get high"

  • Lee shows his pro-biz chops, but how is his balance?