Jerry v. Meg: Reality and the robot

|
(5)

I watched the Brown-Whitman debate on TV, and I had an eerie Nixon-Kennedy experience. On the tube, Whitman looked .... creepy. That fake, plastic smile and the strictly scripted talking points made her appear almost robotic. I kept thinking about the employee she allegedly abused and I wonder if she had that same scary expression on her face when she pushed around and fired people.

Calitics thinks Brown won the debate handily and that Whitman acted as if she were running for governor ot Texas. I thought Jerry went a little over the top when he ranted about how the state's pension funds would be in fine shape if everyone worked until his age (which just reminded the voters how old he is), but overall, he at least seemed real, interesting, and an actual human being. He also talked, at least somewhat, about fiscal reality. Whitman was channeling Schwarzenegger, who decided he could cut $5 billion out of the budget by eliminating the car tax and never worry about replacing the revenue. Her proposal for eliminating capital gains taxes makes even less sense; at least middle-class people got a break when the car tax was cut. All she would do is hlep the very rich.

Overall, I thought it was reality v. the robot. Reality generally wins that round.

 

Comments

I'm glad the panelists were allowed follow-up questions. But can we hope the reporters could also cut off candidates midstream when the latter are ignoring the question asked and instead spouting rehearsed talking points? Whitman blew off the first question about how she would break the logjam on the budget, and did so again on several other questions. This is quite reminiscent of Ms. Palin announcing that she would only answer questions she likes.

Posted by Patrick on Sep. 29, 2010 @ 9:41 am

The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.

U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate Norman Thomas

So pick Jerry

Posted by Dave on Sep. 29, 2010 @ 3:59 pm

Did you watch the same debate I saw. Whitman was on point, answered the questions she was asked and appeared to be informed and businesslike. Brown seemed slow agitated, and angry and short of breathe. He also routinely responded to Whitman's last coment instead of answering the question he was asked. In fact some times he never even let the question be asked. I thought it was embarassing that the moderator let him go. Brown is owned by the unions and Whitman is owned by herself. I think she made this point load and clear.

Posted by Guest DeVo on Sep. 29, 2010 @ 6:52 pm

As one among the labor class who cannot hide his assets in tax shelters or any other scheme my high priced accountant can come up with I am going to celebrate the loss of Meg Whitman's $120 million which she will surely sustain as a result of her own Maid-Gate imbroglio and obvious hypocrisy on the issue of penalizing those who knowingly employ AND exploit undocumented workers. Yes Virginia, there is a GOD!

Posted by Guest on Sep. 29, 2010 @ 10:25 pm