Cohen and Farrell come from behind in early ranked-choice tally

|
(23)
If today's RCV tally holds, Malia Cohen will be the next supervisor to represent southeast San Francisco.

A preliminary run of the ranked-choice ballots in San Francisco Board of Supervisors races shows D10 candidate Malia Cohen and D2 candidate Mark Farrell winning come-from-behind victories in those races while Jane Kim in D6 and Scott Wiener in D8 maintain their current leads to win their races. Yet with about 50,000 ballots citywide remaining to be counted, Election Department head John Arntz warned those results aren't final.

“It's going to change. Nothing is permanent, nothing is final. We have to go through every single ballot,” he told the Guardian.

Still, the results are interesting and could predict the final outcomes, which won't be known for about another week. In the free-for-all that was the D10 race, Tony Kelly maintained his election night lead throughout 18 rounds of redistributing votes, with Kelly at 35.33 percent, Cohen at 33.44 percent, and Lynette Sweet at 31.23 percent. But on the next round, 429 of Sweet's votes went to Cohen and 139 to Kelly, giving Cohen a 152-vote margin of victory: 51.4 percent to 48.6 percent.

In D2, the elections chart appears to show all four also-rans being eliminated at once (normally, the last place candidate is knocked out round by round) and that redistribution gives Farrell the edge over Reilly by just 97 votes, or having 50.3 percent of the vote. But given that there's still lots of votes to count in high-turnout D2, that could change.

In D6, where there was a shootout between two progressives, Kim and Debra Walker, the two candidates appeared to hold their five-point margin of difference through nine rounds of elimination, until the downtown-backed candidate Theresa Sparks was eliminated in round 10, with 769 of her votes going to Kim and 572 to Walker, giving Kim a winning percentage of 54 percent to Walker's 46 percent.

And in D8, the counting of ranked choice ballots shows election night winner Scott Wiener extending his seven-point election night lead to beat Rafael Mandelman with 55.65 percent of the vote.

Arntz said there are about 50,000 ballots remaining, maybe more once provisional ballots are tallied, and the department has been counting them at a rate of 15,000-18,000 per day. So ranked-choice tallies with all the ballot will probably occur by the end of next week, with the final canvassing and certification expected in about 20 days.

 

Guardian intern Nicole Dial contributed this report.

Comments

How could the Guardian be so irresponsible and endorse Maufas? Do none of you have children in public school?

Posted by Parent on Nov. 05, 2010 @ 5:15 pm

please explain

Posted by Guest on Nov. 06, 2010 @ 12:29 am

Congratulations, Jane! Buh-bye, Debra!

Posted by D6 voter on Nov. 05, 2010 @ 5:33 pm

Which issues do you expect Jane to differ from Debra on?

Or is this just about identity politics and having someone pretty to look at?

Posted by Greg on Nov. 05, 2010 @ 11:18 pm

Way to go Malia, congratulations.

I am sure you will be a terrific supervisor for our district.

You are ahead the same week the Giants won, I believe that may be a slightly good omen!!

Cycled along San Bruno Ave earlier today on my way to San Mateo and the ground effort still on view was incredible.

Posted by Edward Penrose on Nov. 05, 2010 @ 5:44 pm

According to Saturday's vote total, Cohen is now in 4th place, trailing Marlene Tran by 38 votes. And Lynette Sweet is only behind Tony Kelly by 15 votes.

I don't see how Malia can win an IRV if she remains in 4th place, but who knows.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 06, 2010 @ 5:41 pm

Boy oh boy did the DCCC blow it in D10! Malia Cohen is going to be worse of a sellout than Sophie Maxwell, and the most frustrating thing is that the DCCC could have stopped it by endorsing a combination of Chris Jackson, Tony Kelly, and maybe one other progressive.

OTOH, all is not lost, thanks to the Guardian! If you guys hadn't exposed how horrible Steve Moss and Lynette Sweet are, the far right could have taken D10. At least the very worst outcome was avoided, because you guys had your shit together unlike the DCCC.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 05, 2010 @ 9:37 pm

Malia Cohen will make an infinitely better supervisor than Steve Moss. His winning would've been catastrophic for District 10. More: http://problemneighbor.net/

Posted by Guest on Nov. 06, 2010 @ 10:42 am

Wow, Lynette Sweet is "the far right".

I'm not even a Lynette Sweet fan, but if you consider her far right, you *seriously* need to take a day trip out of San Francisco.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 05, 2010 @ 11:22 pm

On economic issues such as developer giveaways, coporate power, rent control, condo conversions, taxes... in what way would Lynette Sweet differ from a Republican?

Don't give me social issues -the supes won't be voting on abortion or gay marriage. Bread and butter economic issues are where the differences lie.

Although I would venture to add that when social issues do come up, such as anti-war resolutions, sanctuary cities, police accountability... Sweet's votes would likely be identical to a Republican's as well.

Posted by Greg on Nov. 06, 2010 @ 7:33 am

Yes, let's just take social issues out of the picture when discussing the far right...

Get. The. F*ck. Outta. Here. lol

Let's also discuss the policies of the Nazis, minus the whole aryan superiority thing.. No dude. Doesn't work like that. Progressives in this town don't get to label anything that doesn't meet their social agenda as "far right". Lyenette Sweet's positions on development and sanctuary cities would be right in line with the vast majority of the Democratic leaders in this nation. And honestly, if you want to take the economic positions of our national Democratic and Republican parties, they're not that far off - at all.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 06, 2010 @ 6:05 pm

Don't take my word for it. I was at the Plan C meet-and-greet before the election. Here is a direct quote from Lynette Sweet:
"I used to think I was a liberal, but now I realize I'm as conservative as they come."

This is something that the most craven Blue Dog would never say.

She actually used the line twice. When she first introduced herself, she said "moderate." But once she really got going, she dropped all pretense at "moderation" and proudly proclaimed herself to be a conservative.

"As conservative as they come."

Posted by Greg on Nov. 06, 2010 @ 10:11 pm

Greg, you're having a conversation with yourself at this point. Suppose that's easier than admitting that you tried to parse down the question at hand to some bullshit nobody is buying. Lynette Sweet is not far right, and that's all. You can try all day to say, "well if you just considerthis element of her platform" or "I heard her say once"..... But no, pumpkin.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 07, 2010 @ 6:14 pm

But style doesn't make up for lack of substance.

I stand by calling Sweet a right-winger. I brought up economic issues, and neither you nor anybody else was able to tell me how she would differ on those issues from a Republican. The only substantive thing you said in response was that Democrats and Republicans don't really differ on economic issues. If that's what you really believe, then I think you're hurting your case more than helping it.

I brought up a direct quote, and you dismissed it. Maybe you don't want to admit the obvious, but it's pretty damning when she herself proudly proclaims that she's "as conservative as they come." Maybe she's a liar who was telling a conservative group what they wanted to hear, which doesn't look good on her either. But I tend to believe her at least that time.

But it's all good. Neither she nor the other right wing candidate in the race is going to win, and we should all be grateful for that.

Posted by Greg on Nov. 07, 2010 @ 11:20 pm

What will Jane give us that Debra wouldn't?

Hmm, let's see.

Youth, intelligence, attractiveness, education, integrity and - most of all - someone who isn't vested in the non-profit and NIMBY mafia that Walker is so invested in.

Easy question.

Posted by Tom on Nov. 06, 2010 @ 9:16 am

I'd strongly disagree about your characterization of Debra. Her intelligence and integrity are beyond reproach. She's certainly not as ambitious as Jane, but I think that's a good thing. And I'll give you youth and attractiveness, but I would hope that we can get beyond superficiality. This was a contest for a Supervisor position, not Miss America. Sigh... apparently not.

Anyway, I didn't ask for vague platitudes. I asked for specific issues on where you'd think they might differ.

Posted by Greg on Nov. 06, 2010 @ 9:51 am

If a precinct map the Kim folks produced in a Face Book pic is accurate, it appears that Kim benefited from her support coming directly from Randy Shaw's THC and it's SRO Collaborative, not unlike Daly in 2006.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 06, 2010 @ 2:09 pm

Greg, the main distinction between Walker and Kim was the composition of their electoral coalitions, because as appealing as the two candidates were, there was a whole lot to hate in the electoral coalitions they'd put together.

Let's see how their governing coalitions cleave to their electoral coalitions, as Obama demonstrated, they are not necessarily the same.

-marc

Posted by marcos on Nov. 07, 2010 @ 2:57 am

Here are the raw 1st place D10 votes for the top 5, as of 11/8/10:

MARLENE TRAN 1855 12.07%
MALIA COHEN 1737 11.3%
TONY KELLY 1870 12.17%
LYNETTE SWEET 1829 11.9%
STEVE MOSS 1738 11.31%

Malia seems to be decelerating. She now trails Moss by one vote. Now the question is whether she can surpass Marlene Tran in the final rounds of voting to keep from being trapped in last place. If that happens (and it seems more and more likely that it will), a big chunk of Malia's votes will go to benefit Lynette Sweet. But will those votes be enough to put Sweet over Marlene and Tony?

Tony Kelly's lead is holding, but even if Marlene passes him, it is unlikely she will hold the lead for long. I give the edge to Tony, but Lynette seems to have the second-best shot at winning in D10.

Thoughts?

Posted by Guest on Nov. 08, 2010 @ 5:08 pm

I guess the wild card is Marlene Tran and who her votes go to.

The counts have increased so slightly from yesterday I can only resume that tomorrow will give us the best indication.

Marlene received a huge chunk from Friday to today. Malia was all over Visitation valley so wonder how much that will help.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 08, 2010 @ 5:25 pm

I took a pretty careful look at the RCV breakdown the other day, and you can extrapolate where the new votes will end up.

You are correct that Malia's hold on victory is becoming more tenuous. The more they count, the more she slips. But as of right now, my own look at the internals still gives her a slight edge.

Lynette Sweet has no chance. She's actually not moving up that much. At this point she probably falls away before Tran does.

Tran is kicking butt in absentees, which normally means the provisionals will be the worst for her. The DOE sez there are only 11,000 absentees left citywide. She may or may not make it into the final round. And if it's close in the final, she doesn't win, because neither Sweet nor Cohen nor Kelly's seconds go her way over any other candidate.

Kelly is in a good position to take it. Not at this point yet, unless he's paired against Tran instead of Cohen in the final round. But provisionals could boost him to victory even over Cohen. There are 14,000 provisionals citywide.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 08, 2010 @ 6:39 pm

You know what? As much as I hate your regressive, commie, homless inc. endorsed, "Take back San Francisco! except I'm a 27 year old lesbian who's lived here for 3 years and I no idea what this CIty is about", smelly, Chris Daly's fat peguin ass body lovin', we spend a full year calling Newsom a Nazi in '03 only to endorse him in '10, ugly rag...

I want to give you guys props.

Props for covering local politcs like nobody else does. As important as the Supervisors election is, nobody is on top of it like you guys. Great analysis, great comments, interesting insight. Thanks for the work Sarah and others.

On to D10: Looks like Cohen's edge has grown to 216 votes (from 152 on Friday), and percentage wide up just .2 percent (51.5% to 48.5%). Anything to really gather from this info, or still just noise at this point?

PS - Any thoughts on D? Farrell moves from 67 vote lead to 216?

HUGZ!

Posted by Guest on Nov. 09, 2010 @ 4:51 pm

Malia Cohen is a deadbeat homeowner who wants to boot renters who honor the terms of their contracts. She is anti-rent control for middle-class San Franciscans who did not buy property with dumb loans, but in favor of using their tax dollars to bail out the "real estate debtors'' who took the dumb loans.

Posted by molly on Jan. 31, 2011 @ 6:52 am