Reilly and Kelly concede D2 and D10 races

|
(9)

Two weeks after the Nov. 2 election, D2 candidate Janet Reilly and D10 candidate Tony Kelly issued concession statements, as ranked choice voting counts, which will certified by November 30, placed them second: Reilly trailing Mark Farrell in D2, and Kelly behind Malia Cohen in D10.

For Reilly, the disappointment was sharpened by the knowledge that she received more first-place votes than any other D2 candidate. She won 9,625 first place votes (41.15 percent of vote) compated to Farrell’s 9,442 votes (40.37 percent).

But with neither Reilly or Farrell winning an outright majority, second and third place votes were factored in under the city’s ranked choice voting system. And that calculation tipped the balance in favor of Farrell, who finished with 11,105 votes, (50.62 percent) compared to Reilly’s 10,835 votes (49.38 percent).

Reilly tried to put on a brave face in face of adversity.
“I have spent many years serving people outside public office -- on the Golden Gate Bridge Board, at Clinic by the Bay, at Catholic Charities CYO, through our family's high school scholarship program and at many other institutions,” she aid. “Now that the campaign is finished, I will be able to resume these activities.”

But she voiced her belief that attack campaign prevent potentially good candidates from running for political office. Acknowledging that “public service is an honor” and that it is "an integral part of our democratic tradition for candidates to pass a series of difficult tests before earning the right to hold office,” Reilly  added that she “understands why many bright, capable people choose not to run for office when I see how poisonous and cynical the process can be.”

 “In my own race, an independent expenditure committee armed with $230,000 leveled an 11th-hour smear campaign against me,” Reilly noted. “They violated a litany of election laws while peddling gross distortions and outright lies. This is simply wrong. Actions like this deter many good people from public service.”

That said, she ended on a positive note.

 “I am truly proud of the campaign we ran,” Reilly said. “We never wavered in the face of adversity and we continued bringing our positive message to the voters of D2 all the way through Election Day, You can count on me to be fighting by your side every step of the way for the good of the city.”

For his part, Kelly offered congratulations to Cohen and asserted his relative success in the complex D10 race in which race, class and geographical location had a profound impact on voting patterns—and the ultimate results of the supervisor election

”I came in second in the ranked-choice runoff, by a few hundred votes,” Kelly said, alluding to a race in which Lynette Sweet  won most first place votes (2,059, 12.06 percent), ahead of Kelly (2,035 votes, 11.92 percent) and Malia Cohen and Marlene Tran tied third (2001 votes, 11.72 percent of vote). But once second and third place votes were counted, the importance of strategic alliances, positive campaigns and widespread appeal became clear, as Cohen polevaulted into the lead (4,173 votes, 52.60 percent) ahead of Kelly 3, 761 votes (47.40 percent), while Tran remained in third place (3,256 votes, 30.44 percent) and Sweet dropped to a distant fourth (3077 votes, 23.87 percent).

Kelly acknowledged the importance of running grassroots campaigns under this system.
“We had more donors from D10 than anyone, more volunteers from D 10 than anyone, and just as many first-place votes in D 10 as any other campaign,” Kelly observed. “So we know the voters heard us. They, like us, want a supervisor who will listen to all our concerns, bring real progressive ideas to the Board, and ensure that the City's resources work much harder for the people of District 10.”

He offered an olive branch to the incoming supervisor and her allies by encouraging his supporters to work with Cohen to win the best future for the district.

“Neighborhood leadership is not about one person, or one campaign,” Kelly observed. “The alliances that came together during this year must continue, and I urge everyone interested in my candidacy to work with Sup.  Cohen to show City Hall how to create local jobs, clean up our environment, support our families, and use common sense ideas to fix our budget. In years to come, we will all continue to fight for the people of D10 with courage, compassion, better ideas and hard work.”

And then he signed off with a peace note
”My love to you all, and many thanks, on behalf of my entire staff and the hundreds of volunteers who gave of themselves over the past nine months," Kelly said.

Peace out to Reilly, Kelly and all the candidates in these long, exhausing and ultimately brutal races.

 

Comments

Virtually all the 'winners and loosers' have made gracious public statements of acceptance or concession. Who has not?, at least nowhere I can find - what a surprise, the newly anointed D8 supervisorial supplicant. At least Bevan started out, or so we thought, with good intentions; wit and winning ways; charm and class.
Maybe the Wiener will surprise us, but I sure ain't making book on it !!

Posted by Guest. Patrick Monk.RN on Nov. 17, 2010 @ 4:17 pm

You left the same message on the FCJ website today. Me thinks that no matter what Wiener says or dose, you will find fault...no?

Posted by Guest on Nov. 17, 2010 @ 4:39 pm

Wow to listen to Kelly, you would swear that he wasn't going to spend most of the budget on the homeless, perhaps he is saying now what he should have said before the election.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 17, 2010 @ 4:45 pm

So when Reilly got the most #1 in D2, it very important, when Sweet got the most #1 in D10, it's not important?

Sarah, can you actually call yourself a reporter?

Posted by Guest on Nov. 18, 2010 @ 11:40 am

Not like the Guardian has ever been a shning example of honest reporting, but good - how much longer than avoid the 800 pound gorilla in the room.

The Guardian and the DCCC got their ass handed to them this election cycle. I realize that the majority of their staff and readership hasn't lived here more than 4 years (oh, but trust, they know what San Francisco is *really* all about), but the DCCC endorsement was at one time a golden ticket. You got that, you had about a 95% chance of winning your election. This year... 0-4 on candidates, and crushed on ballot propositions.

The real question - and what the Guardian should be asking as opposed to their subtle whining - is whether or not this represents a marked change in City politics.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 18, 2010 @ 12:02 pm

I'm sure Sweet was equally peeved to find herself losing the D10 race, Guest. I certainly have heard as much from Marlene Tran, who found herself in first place for a while, in terms of first choice votes.

The difference, in terms of my reporting on Reilly's comments and not Sweet's (if that's what your comment is about) is that Sweet was not in second place, when it came to the ranked choice voting calculations, whereas Reilly was.

Posted by sarah on Nov. 18, 2010 @ 12:03 pm

It is a common misconception that the candidate who loses in the last round comes in second place. In an RCV race, the correct way to determine second place is to exclude the winner and then rerun the entire RCV tally. In the D10 race, with Cohen excluded, Sweet wins.

Kelly survived until the last round because he was the strongest opposition to Cohen, but not the second strongest overall. Sweet and Cohen had a lot of supporting voters in common. So Sweet was eliminated earlier than Kelly because more Sweet votes than Kelly votes were still counting for Cohen.

That is a subtlety of RCV that is important to keep in mind when interpreting the results.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 23, 2010 @ 3:09 pm

@ nameless guest. usually ignore those who dare not speak their name, but yes, probably, same as I would have if Rafi had 'won', but at least he wouldn't have started out already co-opted and beholden to the extent that Wiener will. The proof of the pudding will be in the eating and I don't expect it to very palatable.

Posted by Guest. Patrick Monk.RN on Nov. 18, 2010 @ 2:24 pm

Let me guess, over 50 years of age, still renting and angry at the world that you do not own your own house, scared that you will not have enough put away for retirement.

Posted by Guest on Nov. 18, 2010 @ 9:54 pm