Most of the pundits in the center, like the New York Times, liked Obama's State of the Union Speech. And for good reason: It was a centrist, cautious speech that promised lower corporate taxes, conservative education policy, lots of money for the military and cuts for everyone else. Two things, thought, that stood out for me:

1. Obama still believes in government. He made it very clear that he thinks the public sector has an important role to play, not just in regulation but in spurring and stimulating economic growth. He's going about it all wrong, but he did remind people that government -- the public sector -- won the space race, gave birth to the internet, built the interstate highway system and in the process created tens of millions of jobs. The GOP is already going batshit about it; they got the message.

2. The crux of the speech, the "Sputnik Moment," was this line: "To win the future, we'll have to take on challenges that have been decades in the making." Win the future. In fact, over and over, all night, we heard about "winning the future."

But since when was the future a war, something to be fought with an enemy? To "win" the space race we had to "beat" the Soviets, which we did (ha ha, we got to the moon first). To "win" the future, do we have to beat someone else? The Russians aren't up for winning much of anything these days, but Obama seems concerned about competing with China; do the Chinese have to "lose" the future for us to "win?"

It wasn't a random choice of words. The White House speechwriters take this stuff very seriously. "Winning the future" is a catchphrase that the Obama administration wants to be attached to. And it's a bad one.

The future of the planet can't be about winning. When you look at the serious crisis facing the world -- climate change that's going to transform agriculture, put the homes of hundreds of millions of people under water and alter the way every single human being lives -- beating China isn't really relevant. Thomas Friedman says the world is flat, and he's got a point -- if Obama were able to articulate a message of cooperation, of seeking peace and working together with other nations, it would have been a remarkable speech.

Instead: Winning the future. What a loser.