Busy week for immigration reform advocates

|
(12)

On Tuesday, April 26, the California Assembly’s Public Safety Committee holds a hearing on AB 1081, Assemblymember Tom Ammiano’s Transparency and Responsibility Using State Tools (TRUST) Act. The TRUST Act seeks to allow local governments to opt out of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE's) controversial “Secure Communities” program and to set standards for jurisdictions that chose to participate in S-Comm.

Also on Tuesday, Congressmember Luis Gutierrez kicks off his “Change Takes Courage” immigrant rights tour in seven California cities. Gutierrez lands in San Francisco Wednesday, April 27, and the Bay Area immigrant community and LGBT leaders will host him on the steps of City Hall, as Gutierrez asks President Obama to stop the record number of deportations of immigrant families and students that have already occurred under the Obama administration.

Joining Ammiano in Sacramento on Tuesday as co-sponsors of the TRUST Act are Assemblymembers Gil Cedillo (D-LA) and Bill Monning (D- Carmel) and Sen. Leland Yee (D-SF). Endorsers include 80 organizations, local governments and elected officials, including the Santa Clara and Santa Cruz County Boards, San Francisco Sheriff Michael Hennessey and retired Sacramento Police Chief Arturo Venegas, and civil rights and faith groups, including the California Partnership to End Domestic Violence, the California Labor Federation, the San Bernardino Catholic Diocese and Equality California.

SF Sheriff Michael Hennessey blew the whistle on S-Comm last May, but was unable to stop the feds from activating the program in San Francisco last June. And the most recent batch of S-Comm statistics show that San Francisco, once famed as a sanctuary city, now ranks in the top 38 counties nationwide that deport “non-criminal aliens,” which is ICE-speak for immigrants whose primary misstep is that they are in the country without the requisite paperwork.

Ammiano's Trust Act hearing comes just days after Congressmember Zoe Lofgren (D- San Jose) called for an investigation into the conduct of ICE officials around advising local municipalities whether they are required to participate in ICE’s S-Comm program.

"You can’t have a government department essentially lying to local government and to members of Congress. This is not OK,” Lofgren said April 22, following the disclosure of hundreds of ICE documents that allegedly show that the agency has been giving intentionally contradictory and misleading information about S-Comm to local officials.

“From then-Attorney General Brown on down, it’s painfully clear ICE deceived Californians about S-Comm,” said Angela Chan, a staff attorney with the Asian Law Caucus. “That’s unacceptable behavior for a government agency in a democracy.”

Advocates hope that Ammiano’s TRUST Act will restore balance and accountability to the nation’s otherwise broken immigration system. They charge that S-Comm’s misleading focus, over-broad reach and lack of transparency have eroded trust between police and immigrant communities, making victims and witnesses to crimes reluctant to come forward.

The TRUST Act would make S-Comm an “opt-in” program so local governments can tailor their participation based on local needs.

The bill would also set safeguards for municipalities that do elect to participate in S-Comm to guard against racial profiling and would ensure that children and domestic violence survivors are not swept up by S-Comm.

The TRUST act also upholds the right to a day in court by only reporting for deportation individuals convicted - not merely accused - of crimes.

Tuesday’s hearing will be followed by Congressman Luis Gutierrez’s Wednesday appearance in San Francisco, which the African Advocacy Network, Asian Law Caucus, Central American Resource Center, Chinese for Affirmative Action, People Organized to Demand Environmental and Economic Rights, Out4Immigration, San Francisco Interfaith Coalition on Immigration, and Dolores Street Community Services sponsored.

Sups David Campos, John Avalos, and David Chiu will join Gutierrez and their message to President Obama is laid out in the following press statement:

“We need administrative relief to uphold the values of opportunity, justice, and human rights for all to move our country forward. With the stroke of a pen, President Obama could put a halt to the rapidly increasing deportations that are taking place. We need to stop deporting parents and ripping apart all families, including same-sex partners. We need to stop deporting students who would have been eligible for the DREAM ACT. Last year, the U.S. deported an estimated 400,000 immigrants, the highest number of deportations per year in the history of our nation. We must allow our counties to opt out of  “S-Comm” (Secure Communities), which is making our communities less secure, and we support Congressman Gutierrez in these courageous requests. Immigrants are part of the fabric of our communities, and we need to fix our immigration system so everyone who lives here can continue to live as a full member of society without constant fear of safety, security, and livelihood being jeopardized at any moment.”

 
 

Comments

Its so funny that after i left a comment on an article by the Washington Examiner about Obama using the stroke of his pen to sign an executive order for immigration reform, now everybody is using the phrase "with the stroke of his pen". WOW! The power of words. In any event, Obama better sign an executive order cause the last time I checked, the use of an executive order for immigration reform has not changed since 1986 when Reagan signed one either. So Obama....Why are you making so many excuses and what is the hold up? Are you scared of the Republican backlash or are you scared to be looked at as a follower and not a LEADER? In 2008, Obama's slogan was "Yes we can". Thank you for proving to us the "No you didn't".

Posted by victoria on Apr. 25, 2011 @ 4:23 pm

Reagan did no such thing. The reform which took place in 1986 was the result of the Immigration Reform and Control Act, which was passed by Congress and which Reagan signed in November 1986. The only executive orders relating to immigration that Reagan ever signed were those allocating more resources for stricter interdiction. The idea that the 1986 reforms were an act of presidential fiat is a complete myth.

The President actually has only limited scope to promulgate new rules on immigration because policymaking in this area is a constitutionally enumerated power of Congress, and thus out of reach of the executive branch, which must comply with the law as written. For the same reason, large parts of immigration law are not subject to the normal process of judicial review. Congress holds most of the power in this area and guards it jealously. I'd love to see immigration policy remade from top to bottom by President Obama too, but as someone with a professional interest in immigration law, I regret to say that it is not really possible for him, or any President, to do that. Remember that even George W. Bush wanted to reform US immigration policy and spent years building a bipartisan coalition in Congress to make it happen, but in 2007 it fell apart and the problem has gone unfixed since then.

Posted by Guest on Apr. 26, 2011 @ 1:06 am

Yes, we need to put pressure on Obama now more than ever! I encourage SFBG readers to call President Obama (202)456-1111 and demand that he put a freeze on all non-criminal deportations.

One in four people deported under S-Comm haven’t been convicted of any crime.
This is why so many enforcement groups have come out against the "Secure Communities" program. The TRUST Act (Transparency and Responsibility Using State Tools) represents long overdue and much-needed reform of S-Comm.

Kudos to Assemblymember Ammiano, Sheriff Hennessey, John Avalos, David Campos, and Congressmember Gutierrez for their leadership and courage in addressing this issue.

Sarah, thank you for your thorough and thoughtful reportage. You are one of the reasons I turn to SFBG on a regular basis.

Posted by Lisa on Apr. 25, 2011 @ 5:21 pm

The "one in four" figure is wrong, but that was what was being reported until recently. Here's the latest data:

"Recently released data show that half of the immigration holds issued since the inception of the Secure Communities program have been for non-criminals or those charged with misdemeanors -- not the violent criminals the program has purported to prioritize."

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/04/congresswoman-calls-for-in...

Posted by Lisa on Apr. 26, 2011 @ 4:24 pm

this is home of the grave land of the slave

Posted by Guest on Apr. 26, 2011 @ 5:05 am

Robert Bork was hated because he said abortion was a states rights issue, in an attempt to get over.

But now that they can't win at the federal level like Bork, they scheme it down to the local level.

Also all this complaining about the right not liking democracy from the left, the dream legislation lost, to get around democracy, the neo-con like left wants EO from Obama.

Interesting, I want what I want when I want it.

Posted by matlock on Apr. 26, 2011 @ 9:24 am

Who, but other like-minded racial supremacists, would want to attend a hate-fest rally sponsored by racial supremacists like Illinois Democratic Congressman Luis Guiterrez and Ca. Democratic assemblyman Gil Cedillo?

Hopefully, the La Raza / Brown Beret gangs promoting this event will invite the Black Panthers, KKK, Nazis, Jewish Defense League, Asian Gangs, and the equally hostile American Indian Movement to this spectacular display of racial dominance. After all, we wouldn't want someone to cry "race card" would we?

What a shame that our country has devolved from a nation heralded as a nation governed by laws into a nation governed by mob rule...that mob being millions of illegal aliens currently illegally occupying U.S. territory. But, I guess that is what happens to a society where some members of its law enforcement organizations bend to the pressure of mob rule instead of enforcing our laws. Makes you wonder how many cops have relinguished their authority to maintain peace and order in MS-13 gang infested neighborhoods.

Fortunately, only a remote segment of U.S. law enforcement bureaucrats have corrupted themselves over the lawlessness of "illegal" immigration. But,if our cops refuse to enforce our laws, then why are taxpayers paying them? They would fit in more appropriately in law enforcement organizations in Mexico, Somalia, or Afghanistan...places where law enforcement corruption is a prosperous way of life.

Maybe it is time to deport our corrupt cops to a country where they can "find a better life" and avoid such high police standards like the expectations by the American public to provide law and order.

My two cents. :)

Jim Gilchrist, Founder and President, The Minuteman Project
- a multiethnic immigration law enforcement advocacy group -

Posted by The Minuteman Project on Apr. 26, 2011 @ 10:58 am

Jim Gilchrist, your association with Shawna Forde, who was just convicted for the murder of nine-year-old Brisenia Flores and her father Raul Flores, and with hate groups like the National Alliance, undermines the racist drivel you've posted here. You are clearly projecting your own racism on legitimate leaders and organizations of the Latin@ community. Take it elsewhere, Gilchrist!

We will never forget little Brisenia Flores. As far as I'm concerned, you belong in jail along with your former 'Border Operations Organizer' Shawna Forde. You are a sad excuse for a human being.

Posted by Lisa on Apr. 26, 2011 @ 6:05 pm

in style and substance from the things you quote.

Two peas in a pod.

Posted by maltlock on Apr. 26, 2011 @ 6:24 pm
Oh?

One is a white supremacist whose beliefs are beyond ludicrous and the other is someone pointing that out--meaning that they have nothing in common at all.

Like you and reality. Or you and a researched statement that doesn't only exist to contradict whomever made one first.

You're like crabs. Wish they'd pour A-200 over this website.

Posted by Matty on Apr. 26, 2011 @ 6:38 pm

Not agreeing with you or her on immigration laws, laws that all nations have is racist.

and

Not agreeing to you two's strawman arguments is racist.

You get to set up what is racist, meaning not agreeing with your opinion as fact.

So your point is?

Posted by matlock on Apr. 26, 2011 @ 8:27 pm

Jim: It wouldn't matter a whit if Cedillo/La Raza et al called for the execution of every white person in the Southwest and the return of the land to Mexico, wanna know why?

Because they have no power whatsoever. Power in America is derived from money and property ownership and "brown people" don't have a whole lot of that. So, whatever they say in their rallies is irrelevant, because their actual ability to make their supposed wishes stick (like Reconquista) is nil. What working class people of all ethnic persuasions have wanted all through history is MORE MONEY and better work--because right now, they don't have it.

You, on the other hand, represent whites (and don't start with your "I have Latino relatives schtick, it's even worse than 'some of my best friends are black"). White folks are land owners. Whites are business owners. Whites are the dominant group of politicians in CA and AZ and NV. We white people still have almost all of the say disproportionate to our numbers--and your whole act, based in the horrible fear that we'll be swallowed up by a brown wave, is how you scare up enough cash for your own survival. Hell of a racket.

Frightened white folks thinking their "heritage" is disappearing (in states with Spanish names, in cities with Spanish names, driving on streets with Spanish names and eating Mexican food) is how you keep your own bank account flush. Can the crap about "illegal immigrants", stop offering up jobs to illegals and they never come here and you know that and so do I and the jobs in question aren't being offered by "brown people" but by whites wanting cheaper labor. Playing on the fears of aged people seeing a browner future (LA is now minority/majority and its crime rate keeps dropping, why is that?) is how you earn your living--good for you.

But your kids and mine don't care about the "great divide" anymore. Too bad.

Posted by Matty on Apr. 26, 2011 @ 1:58 pm